bioRxiv ScienceSearch

Biology subjects

Sorensen, C. S.

Publications and source records attributed to Sorensen, C. S..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Topokaryotyping demonstrates single cell variability and stress dependent variations in nuclear envelope associated domains

Analysis of large-scale interphase genome positioning with reference to a nuclear landmark has recently been studied using sequencing-based single cell approaches. However, these approaches are dependent upon technically challenging, time consuming and costly high throughput sequencing technologies, requiring specialized bioinformatics tools and expertise. Here, we propose a novel, affordable and robust microscopy-based single cell approach, termed Topokaryotyping, to analyze and reconstruct the interphase positioning of genomic loci relative to a given nuclear landmark, detectable as banding pattern on mitotic chromosomes. This is accomplished by proximity-dependent histone labeling, where biotin ligase BirA fused to nuclear envelope marker Emerin was coexpressed together with Biotin Acceptor Peptide (BAP)-histone fusion followed by (i) biotin labeling, (ii) generation of mitotic spreads, (iii) detection of the biotin label on mitotic chromosomes and (iv) their identification by karyotyping. Using Topokaryotyping, we identified both cooperativity and stochasticity in the positioning of emerin-associated chromatin domains in individual cells. Furthermore, the chromosome-banding pattern showed dynamic changes in emerin-associated domains upon physical and radiological stress. In summary, Topokaryotyping is a sensitive and reliable technique to quantitatively analyze spatial positioning of genomic regions interacting with a given nuclear landmark at the single cell level in various experimental conditions.

cell biology

A histone H4K20 methylation-mediated chromatin compaction threshold ensures genome integrity by limiting DNA replication licensing

The decompaction and re-establishment of chromatin organization immediately after mitosis is essential for genome regulation. The mechanisms underlying chromatin structure control in daughter cells are not fully understood. Here, we show that a chromatin compaction threshold in cells exiting mitosis ensures genome integrity by limiting replication licensing in G1 phase. Upon mitotic exit, appropriate chromatin relaxation is safeguarded by SET8-dependent methylation of histone H4 on lysine 20. Thus, in the absence of either SET8 or the H4K20 residue, substantial genome-wide chromatin decompaction occurs which allows excessive loading of the Origin Recognition Complex (ORC) in the daughter cells. ORC overloading stimulates aberrant recruitment of the MCM2-7 complex that promotes single-stranded DNA formation and DNA damage. Restoring chromatin compaction restrains excess replication licensing and the loss of genome integrity. Our findings identify a cell cycle-specific mechanism whereby fine-tuned chromatin relaxation suppresses excessive detrimental replication licensing and maintains genome integrity at the cellular transition from mitosis to G1 phase.

molecular biology

Mutational signatures reveal the role of RAD52 in p53-independent p21 driven genomic instability

BackgroundGenomic instability promotes evolution and heterogeneity of tumors. Unraveling its mechanistic basis is essential to design appropriate therapeutic strategies. In a recent study we reported an unexpected oncogenic property of p21WAF1/Cip1 showing that its chronic expression, in a p53-deficient environment, causes genomic instability by deregulating the replication licensing machinery.\n\nResultsExtending on this work we now demonstrate that p21WAF1/Cip1 can further fuel genomic instability by suppressing the repair capacity of low and high fidelity pathways that deal with nucleotide abnormalities. Consequently, fewer single nucleotide substitutions (SNSs) occur, while formation of highly deleterious DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) is enhanced, crafting a characteristic mutational signature landscape. Guided by the mutational signatures formed, we found at the mechanistic level that the DSBs were repaired by Rad52-dependent Break-Induced Replication (BIR) and Single-Strand Annealing (SSA). Conversely, the error-free synthesis-dependent strand annealing (SDSA) repair route was deficient. Surprisingly, Rad52 was activated transcriptionally in an E2F1-dependent manner, rather than post-translationally as is common for DNA repair factor activation.\n\nConclusionsOur results signify the importance of mutational signatures as guides to disclose the \"repair history\" leading to genomic instability. In this vein, following this approach we unveiled how chronic p21WAF1/Cip1 expression rewires the repair process, identifying Rad52 as a source of genomic instability and a candidate therapeutic target.

cancer biology