bioRxiv ScienceSearch

Biology subjects

Song, S.-K.

Publications and source records attributed to Song, S.-K..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Diffusion Histology Imaging Detects and Classifies Glioblastoma Pathology Missed by Conventional Magnetic Resonance Imaging

PurposeGlioblastoma (GBM) is one of the deadliest cancers with no cure. While conventional MRI has been widely adopted for examining GBM clinically, accurate neuroimaging assessment of tumor histopathology for improved diagnosis, surgical planning, and treatment evaluation, remains an unmet need in the clinical management of GBMs. Experimental DesignWe employ a novel Diffusion Histology Imaging (DHI) approach, combining diffusion basis spectrum imaging (DBSI) and machine learning, to detect, differentiate, and quantify areas of high cellularity, tumor necrosis, and tumor infiltration in GBM. ResultsGd-enhanced T1W or hyper-intense FLAIR failed to reflect the morphological complexity underlying tumor in GBM patients. Contrary to the conventional wisdom that apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) negatively correlates with increased tumor cellularity, we demonstrate disagreement between ADC and histologically confirmed tumor cellularity in glioblastoma specimens, whereas DBSI-derived restricted isotropic diffusion fraction positively correlated with tumor cellularity in the same specimens. By incorporating DBSI metrics as classifiers for a supervised machine learning algorithm, we accurately predicted high tumor cellularity, tumor necrosis, and tumor infiltration with 87.5%, 89.0% and 93.4% accuracy, respectively. ConclusionOur results suggest that DHI could serve as a favorable alternative to current neuroimaging techniques for guiding biopsy or surgery as well as monitoring therapeutic response in the treatment of glioblastoma. Translational RelevanceCurrent clinical diagnosis, surgical planning, and assessment of treatment response for GBM patients relies heavily on gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MRI, which is non-specific for tumor growth and merely reflects a disrupted blood-brain barrier. The complex tumor microenvironment and spatial heterogeneity make GBM difficult to characterize using current clinical imaging modalities. In this study, we developed a novel imaging technique to characterize and accurately predict key histological features of GBM - high tumor cellularity, tumor necrosis, and tumor infiltration. While further validation in a larger cohort of patients is needed, the current proof-of-concept approach could provide a solution to resolve important clinical questions such as the identification of true tumor progression vs. pseudoprogression or radiation necrosis.

neuroscience

The Impact of Edema and Fiber Crossing on Diffusion MRI Metrics: DBSI vs. Diffusion ODF

PurposeDiffusion tensor imaging (DTI) has been employed for over two decades to noninvasively quantify central nervous system (CNS) diseases/injuries. However, DTI is an inadequate simplification of diffusion modeling in the presence of co-existing inflammation, edema, and crossing nerve fibers.\n\nMethodsWe employed a tissue phantom using fixed mouse trigeminal nerves coated with various amounts of agarose gel to mimic crossing fibers in the presence of vasogenic edema. Diffusivity measures derived by DTI and diffusion basis spectrum imaging (DBSI) were compared at increasing levels of simulated edema and degrees of fiber crossing. Further, we assessed the ability of DBSI, diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI), generalized q-sampling imaging (GQI), q-ball imaging (QBI), and neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI) to resolve fiber crossing, in reference to the gold standard angles measured from structural images.\n\nResultsDTI-computed diffusivities and fractional anisotropy (FA) were significantly confounded by gelmimicked edema and crossing fibers. Conversely, DBSI calculated accurate diffusivities of individual fibers regardless of the extent of simulated edema and degrees of fiber crossing angles. Additionaly, DBSI accurately and consistently estimated crossing angles in various conditions of gel-mimicked edema when comparing with gold standard (r2=0.92, p=1.9x10-9, bias=3.9{degrees}). Small crossing angles and edema sinficantly impact dODF, making DKI, GQI and QBI less accurate in detecting and estimating fibers corrsing angles. Lastly, we demonstrate DBSIs superiority over DTI for recovering and delineating white matter tracts in peritumoral edema for preoperative planning of surgical resection.\n\nConclusionsDBSI is able to separate two crossing fibers and accurately recover their diffusivities in a complex environment characterized by increasing crossing angles and amounts of gel-mimicked edema. DBSI also indicated better angular resolution capability compared with DKI, QBI and GQI.

neuroscience