bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Solowiej-Wedderburn, J.

Publications and source records attributed to Solowiej-Wedderburn, J..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Competition and cooperation: The plasticity of bacteria interactions across environments

Bacteria live in diverse communities, forming complex networks of interacting species. A central question in bacterial ecology is why some species engage in cooperative interactions, whereas others compete. But this question often neglects the role of the environment. Here, we use genome-scale metabolic networks from two different open-access collections (AGORA and CarveMe) to assess pairwise interactions of different microbes in varying environmental conditions (provision of different environmental compounds). By scanning thousands of environments for 10,000 pairs of bacteria from each collection, we found that most pairs were able to both compete and cooperate depending on the availability of environmental resources. This approach allowed us to determine commonalities between environments that could facilitate the potential for cooperation or competition between a pair of species. Namely, cooperative interactions, especially obligate, were most common in less diverse environments. Further, as compounds were removed from the environment, we found interactions tended to degrade towards obligacy. However, we also found that on average at least one compound could be removed from an environment to switch the interaction from competition to facultative cooperation or vice versa. Together our approach indicates a high degree of plasticity in microbial interactions to the availability of environmental resources.

microbiology↗

Monolayer force generation and transmission is dictated by focal adhesion distribution

For tissue development, cells must generate contractile forces which are transmitted to their surrounding matrix or neighbouring cells via adhesion complexes. It is often envisaged that a simple linear counterbalance of cell generated stress with extracellular matrix (ECM) traction forces exists. However, experimental evidence indicates that modulating cell-ECM attachment does not necessarily lead to expected reciprocal changes in intercellular stresses. As ECM composition or mechanical properties are rarely uniform, it is important to understand the complexity of how focal adhesions alter stress transmission and the force-balance of a tissue. To address this, we confined monolayers on adhesive patterns altering focal adhesion distribution. Traction force microscopy and laser ablations of cell-cell junctions were used to examine stresses across epithelial monolayers whilst modulating substrate stiffness. We show that monolayers reach different force-balance states depending on focal adhesion distribution. Using an active matter model and confirmed experimentally, we reveal that a force-balance is generated by non-uniform patterns of cell contractility linked to adhesion patterning. This work highlights the importance of integrating the position of cell-ECM attachments into our vision of the mechanical landscape of living tissues. TeaserTo infer a tissues force-balance, positional information of focal adhesion distribution needs to be integrated due to the emergence of non-uniform patterns of cell contractility.

biophysics↗

Cell strain energy costs of active control of contractility

Cell mechanosensing is implicated in the control of a broad range of cell behaviours, with cytoskeletal contractility a key component. Experimentally, it is observed that the contractility of the cell responds to increasing substrate stiffness, showing increased contractile force and changing the distribution of cytoskeletal elements. Here we show using a theoretical model of active cell contractility that upregulation of contractility need not be energetically expensive, especially when combined with changes in adhesion and contractile distribution. Indeed, we show that a feedback mechanism based on maintenance of strain energy would require an upregulation in contractile pressure on all but the softest substrates. We consider both the commonly reported substrate strain energy and active work done. We demonstrate substrate strain energy would select for the observed clustering of cell adhesions on stiffer substrates which also enable an upregulation of total contractile pressure; while localisation of contractility has the greatest impact on the internal work.

biophysics↗

Sticking around: Optimal cell adhesion patterning for energy minimization and substrate mechanosensing

Cell mechanotransduction, in which cells sense and respond to the physical properties of their micro-environments, is proving fundamental to understanding cellular behaviours across biology. Tissue stiffness (Youngs modulus) is typically regarded as the key control parameter and bioengineered gels with defined mechanical properties have become an essential part of the toolkit for interrogating mechanotransduction. We here, however, show using a mechanical cell model that the effective substrate stiffness experienced by a cell depends not just on the engineered mechanical properties of the substrate but critically also on the particular arrangement of adhesions between cell and substrate. In particular, we find that cells with different adhesion patterns can experience two different gel stiffnesses as equivalent and will generate the same mean cell deformations. For small adhesive patches, which mimic experimentally observed focal adhesions, we demonstrate that the observed dynamics of adhesion growth and elongation can be explained by energy considerations. Significantly we show different focal adhesions dynamics for soft and stiff substrates with focal adhesion growth not preferred on soft substrates consistent with reported dynamics. Equally, fewer and larger adhesions are predicted to be preferred over more and smaller, an effect enhanced by random spot placing with the simulations predicting qualitatively realistic cell shapes in this case. The model is based on a continuum elasticity description of the cell and substrate system, with an active stress component capturing cellular contractility. This work demonstrates the necessity of considering the whole cell-substrate system, including the patterning of adhesion, when investigating cell stiffness sensing, with implications for mechanotransductive control in biophysics and tissue engineering. Author summaryCells are now known to sense the mechanical properties of their tissue micro-environments and use this as a signal to control a range of behaviours. Experimentally, such cell mechanotransduction is mostly investigated using carefully engineered gel substrates with defined stiffness. Here we show, using a model integrating active cellular contractility with continuum mechanics, that the way in which a cell senses its environment depends critically not just on the stiffness of the gel but also on the spatial patterning of adhesion sites. In this way, two gels of substantially different stiffnesses can be experienced by the cell as similar, if the adhesions are located differently. Exploiting this insight, we demonstrate that it is energetically favourable for small adhesions to grow and elongate on stiff substrates but that this is not the case on soft substrates. This is consistent with experimental observations that nascent adhesions only mature to stable focal adhesion (FA) sites on stiff substrates where they also grow and elongate. These focal adhesions (FAs) have been the focus of work on mechanotransduction. However, our paper demonstrates that there is a fundamental need to consider the combined cell and micro-environment system moving beyond a focus on individual FAs.

biophysics↗