bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Soloveva, M. V.

Publications and source records attributed to Soloveva, M. V..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Perceptual Degradation Affects Stop-Signal Performance in Normal Healthy Adults

During stop-signal task performance, little is known how the quality of visual information of the go stimuli may indirectly affect the interplay between the go and stop processes. In this study, we assessed how perceptual degradation of the visual go stimuli affect response inhibition. Twenty-six healthy individuals (mean age 33.34 {+/-} 9.61) completed a modified 12-minute stop-signal task, where V and Y letters were used as visual go stimuli. The stimuli were subjected to four levels of perceptual degradation using Gaussian smoothing, to parametrically manipulate stop difficulty across low, intermediate-1, intermediate-2 and high difficulty conditions. On 33% of trials, the stop-signal (50ms audio tone) followed a go stimulus after a stop-signal delay, which was individually adjusted for each participant. As predicted, we found that with increased level of stop difficulty (little perceptual degradation), reaction times on go trials and the proportion of successful behavioural inhibitions on stop trials (P(i)) decreased in normal healthy adults. Contrary to our predictions, there was no effect of increased stop difficulty on the number of correct responses on go trials and reaction times on stop trials. Overall, manipulation of the completion time of the go process via perceptual degradation has been partially successful, whereby increased stop difficulty differentially affected P(i) and SSRT. These findings have implications for the relationship between the go and stop processes and the horse-race model, which may be limited in explaining the role of various cortico-basal ganglia loops in modulation of response inhibition. HighlightsO_LIManipulation of the completion time of the go process is partially successful C_LIO_LIPerceptual degradation differentially affects stop-signal performance C_LIO_LIIncreased stop difficulty (easy go) results in lower P(i) C_LIO_LIIncreased stop difficulty (easy go) has no effect on SSRT C_LIO_LIHorse-race model does not fully explain basal ganglia involvement in inhibition C_LI

neuroscience↗

Compensation Related Utilization of Neural Circuits Hypothesis Model in Response Inhibition in Premanifest Huntington’s Disease

During premanifest stages of Huntingtons disease (pre-HD), individuals typically show increased functional brain activity thought to compensate for widespread brain anomalies. What remains unknown, is to disentangle whether increased functional brain activity reflects compensation or whether it is more of a product of HD-related pathological processes. We used a quantitative model of compensation, known as the CRUNCH (Compensation-Related Utilization of Neural Circuits Hypothesis) to characterise compensatory function in pre-HD using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). To test CRUNCH predictions, pre-HD individuals (n = 15) and age- and gender-matched controls (n = 15) performed a modified stop-signal task that incremented in four levels of stop difficulty (low, intermediate-1, intermediate-2, and high). Our results did not support the critical assumption of the CRUNCH model - controls did not show increased fMRI activity with increased level of stop difficulty. By contrast, controls showed decreased fMRI activity with increased stop difficulty in right inferior frontal gyrus pars triangularis and right caudate nucleus. Relative to controls, pre-HD individuals showed increased fMRI activity in right inferior frontal gyrus pars triangularis at intermediate-2 and high level of stop difficulty, which is the opposite effect to that predicted by the CRUNCH model. Contrary to the CRUNCH prediction, the pre-HD group showed decreased fMRI activity in right caudate nucleus at low level of stop difficulty, compared with controls. Further to this, fMRI activity patterns in right inferior frontal gyrus pars triangularis and right caudate nucleus were not accompanied by a decline in the number of successful behavioural stops in pre-HD. We therefore suggest that the CRUNCH model does not apply to characterise compensatory processes associated with response inhibition in pre-HD.\n\nHighlightsO_LICRUNCH does not apply to characterise compensation during stop-signal in pre-HD\nC_LIO_LIDeficits in inhibitory control in pre-HD occur 25 years prior to clinical diagnosis\nC_LIO_LICRUNCH may show signs of selective reporting\nC_LI

neuroscience↗

To CRUNCH or not to CRUNCH: Task Difficulty Affects Functional Brain Reorganisation during Visuospatial Working Memory Performance in Premanifest Huntington’s Disease

Presymptomatic Huntingtons disease (pre-HD) individuals tend to increase functional brain activity to compensate for HD-related brain anomalies. We used a quantitative model of compensation, known as the CRUNCH (Compensation-Related Utilization of Neural Circuits Hypothesis) to explicitly characterise compensation in pre-HD. We acquired functionalmagnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data (n = 15 pre-HD; n = 15 controls) during performance of an 18-minute fMRI visuospatial working memory task with low, intermediate-1, intermediate-2, and high memory loads. Consistent with the CRUNCH prediction, pre-HD individuals showed decreased fMRI activity in left intraparietal sulcus at high memory load, compared to healthy controls who showed increased fMRI activity in left intraparietal sulcus at high memory load. Contrary to the other CRUNCH prediction, the pre-HD group did not show compensatory increase in fMRI activity at lower levels of memory loads in left intraparietal sulcus. Our findings provide partial support for the validity of CRUNCH in pre-HD.\n\nHighlightsO_LIVisuospatial working memory deficits in pre-HD occur 25 years prior to predicted disease onset\nC_LIO_LITask demands differentially affect fMRI activity in left intraparietal sulcus\nC_LIO_LICRUNCH can partially apply in Huntingtons disease\nC_LI

neuroscience↗