Biology subjects

Sobinov, A. R.

Publications and source records attributed to Sobinov, A. R..

9 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

Interaction forces reflect the perception of texture during active exploration

AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWWe are constantly exploring the world around us through touch. Active touch depends on coordination of movement and force, yet the forces used during natural exploration and their relationship with perception is largely unexplored. Here we measured exploration forces together with fingertip motion while 17 participants explored 14 textures and rated their perceived hardness, slipperiness, or roughness. Exploration strategies differed systematically across tasks: hardness judgments involved relatively stationary pressing with larger and more variable normal forces, whereas slipperiness and roughness judgments relied more on sweeping movements. Within tasks, interaction forces covaried with perceptual ratings: harder textures elicited larger maximum tangential forces, consistent with diagonal pressing, while more slippery textures were explored with faster fingertip motion and lower forces. Estimated dynamic friction was negatively correlated with perceived slipperiness but not roughness. At the same time perceived roughness was strongly related to vibrations in the force, indicating distinct physical bases for these perceptual dimensions. These results show that humans actively tailor contact mechanics to perceptual goals during active exploration, supporting a sensorimotor account of texture perception. SO_SCPLOWIGNIFICANCEC_SCPLOWO_SCPCAP C_SCPCAPO_SCPLOWSTATEMENTC_SCPLOWTouch is usually studied as if the skin passively receives information, but in everyday life we actively move and press against objects to recognize them and learn what they feel like. This study measured both fingertip motion and contact forces while people freely explored textures and judged hardness, slipperiness, and roughness - the three of the most salient dimensions of tactile experience. The results show that people adjust how they move and press depending on what they want to perceive, and that different physical signals - friction and vibration - support different texture judgments. This work helps explain touch as an active sensorimotor process, with implications for neuroscience, haptics, robotics, and neuroprosthetics.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2026

A framework for quantifying the mechanics of dexterous grasp

AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWA hallmark of primate behavior is the exceptional ability to dexterously grasp and manipulate objects, yet the investigation of the neural mechanisms that support manual dexterity has been hindered by technical challenges. Optical hand tracking is complicated by frequent occlusions, and contact forces are hard to measure with sufficient precision. Furthermore, while monitoring the kinematics during reaching phase, and the contact forces during object manipulation phase is difficult, joint torques are impossible to measure directly. While challenging, the ability to estimate joint torques in the complex primate hand could provide an invaluable continuous mechanical description spanning both phases. With this in mind, we have developed an experimental apparatus and data processing pipeline for quantifying these variables describing prehension. The apparatus presented objects of various sizes and orientations throughout the workspace, evoking different grasping strategies. Object surfaces were instrumented with thousands of pressure-sensitive elements, enabling high-resolution measurement of distributed contact forces. Simultaneously, eight high-speed cameras were used to reconstruct hand and arm movements with markerless tracking, triangulating 3D landmarks, and mapping them onto a musculoskeletal model, enabling estimation of time-varying joint angles. This posture quantification allowed contact forces to be automatically assigned to specific hand segments, in close agreement with manual human annotations. We used the reconstructed movements and contact forces with the musculoskeletal model of the hand to compute inverse dynamics, yielding joint torques throughout behavior, unifying the hand kinematics and grasp forces into a single physical description. Throughout the processing, we identified individual neurons in the motor cortex of monkeys that were related to grasp force, kinematics, and torques. Together, this framework enabled a comprehensive and precise physical characterization of primate manual behavior, providing a foundation for investigating the neural mechanisms of manual dexterity.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2026

Overlap in neural representations of coordinated wrist and finger movements in human motor cortex

Dexterous hand function underlies many essential human activities, from tool use to expression through gestures. Coordinated digit movements are enabled by the intricate musculature of the hand and forearm, which also imposes mechanical coupling between the digits and wrist, constraining their independent control. It remains unclear whether motor cortex inherits these constraints in its activity or encodes digit and wrist independently. To address this problem, we asked individuals with intracortical microelectrode arrays implanted in motor cortex to attempt flexion and extension of individual digits, either in isolation or in combination with attempted wrist movements. We could accurately decode which digit was moving based on cortical recordings, and channels selective for digit identity were arranged somatotopically across the recording arrays. Nevertheless, the activity during flexion or extension overlapped between digits, and movement direction of a given digit could be reliably inferred by a decoder trained on movements of other digits. This directional signal was largely invariant to the digits initial posture. The population axis describing digit movement direction was aligned with the axes associated with wrist flexion-extension or pronation-supination. This alignment persisted during simultaneous wrist and digit movements, which complicated efforts to control them individually. However, by decoding wrist and digit motion from activity orthogonal to the shared direction axis, a participant was able to achieve continuous control of virtual hand movements with improved speed and reduced unintended movements. Together, the results identify both a code for digit identity and a low-dimensional flexion-extension signal which is shared across the digits and wrist. This arrangement is consistent with muscle-like biomechanical constraints on motor cortical activity, which must be accounted for to improve coordinated BCI control.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2026

Evolutionarily conserved neural dynamics across mice, monkeys, and humans

On evolutionary timescales, brain circuits adapt to support survival in each species ecological niche. While some anatomical aspects of neural circuitry are conserved across species with distant evolutionary origins, each species also exhibits specific circuit adaptations that enable its behavioral repertoire. It remains unclear whether homologous brain regions leverage analogous neural computations as different species perform common behaviors such as reaching and manipulating objects. Here, we directly assessed conservation of neural computations using intracortical recordings from mouse, monkey, and human motor cortex--a homologous region across many mammals--during motor behaviors crucial for survival. We hypothesized that, despite their phylogenetic distance, rodents and primates produce movements through conserved neural computations implemented by motor cortical population dynamics. Remarkably, we found that movement-related neural dynamics were highly conserved across species, while variations in behavioral output were uniquely captured in neural trajectory geometries. Strikingly, neural dynamics during movement across species were more conserved than those across brain regions in the same human and between motor preparation and execution in the same monkeys. Lastly, through manipulation of neural network models trained to perform reaching movements, we reinforce that conservation of neural dynamics across species likely stems from shared circuit constraints. We thus assert that evolution maintains neural computations across phylogeny even as behavioral repertoires expand.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2026

Consistent EMG encoding during reach and grasp by neurons in motor cortex

Identifying what the activity of neurons in the primary motor cortex (M1) represents is essential for understanding motor computation. Yet the relation of M1 to muscles and movement remains unresolved, in part because the kinematic variables M1 appears to encode differ across the limb: hand velocity during reaching, but joint position during grasping. This discrepancy has been taken to imply fundamentally distinct control strategies for proximal and distal segments. Yet, here we show that a single, muscle-based control principle accounts well for both observations. We recorded neural activity, electromyographic (EMG) signals, and movement kinematics from macaque monkeys performing planar reaching, wrist movement, or free-form grasping tasks. Across behaviors, EMG-based encoding models explained M1 firing rates as accurately as the best-performing kinematic model: velocity for reaching, position for grasping, and either variable for wrist movements. Impulse response analysis revealed that these task-dependent kinematic relationships arise from the differences in mechanical impedance of each limb segment: the inertial and intersegmental coupling which dominate the dynamics of the proximal arm are far less important in the hand. These findings indicate that M1 output has a relatively simple, consistent relation to muscle activation and that the apparent divergence in kinematic encoding is a consequence of limb mechanics rather than distinct cortical strategies.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2026

Distinct neural modes carry information about grasp force and phase in the sensorimotor cortex

Humans perform a variety of complex hand movements to manipulate objects, requiring precise control of changing forces. Understanding the role of sensorimotor cortex and the cortical dynamics underlying these actions is crucial for developing interventions that restore dexterous hand function after injury or disease. In this study, two individuals with tetraplegia resulting from cervical spinal cord injury attempted a series of isometric grasps. Neural activity was recorded from the motor and somatosensory cortices using intracortical microelectrode arrays while participants attempted to exert a static force or to ramp force up and down. Despite their inability to execute movement, and with limited afferent input, the spiking activity in motor and somatosensory cortex was modulated with the task. Within the neural response we identified independent neural modes - distinct patterns of population-level neural activity - that were informative about both the timing and magnitude of the force. Moreover, distinct neural modes were observed during static and dynamic grasping conditions, suggesting independent control schemes for maintaining and changing forces. These modes were related to phases of the task, including the onset, offset, holding periods, as well as phases of increasing and decreasing force. These results will inform the design of intracortical brain-computer interface (iBCI) systems that can leverage these naturally occurring patterns of grasp and force control to restore dexterous hand function. Significance StatementRestoring dexterous hand function after injury remains a major challenge, partly due to an incomplete understanding of the cortical dynamics underlying grasping and force control. In this study, we investigated neural activity within the motor and somatosensory cortices of individuals with tetraplegia attempting to perform grasps to different target forces with varying temporal profiles. We identified distinct neural modes modulated during specific phases of grasp that encode force information throughout the task. These findings suggest that brain-computer interfaces could leverage these native neural modes to restore grasping and force modulation.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2024

Changes in cortical grasp-related activity before and after object contact

The transition from hand opening to grasping a coffee cup happens smoothly, yet the neural systems underlying this behavior undergo a significant state change at the onset of grasp. At this moment, the motor system begins to control contact forces and the somatosensory system receives a barrage of cutaneous signals that convey information about contact forces and the objects local features (e.g., edges, texture, and curvature). These cutaneous signals supplement the ongoing flow of proprioceptive input that encodes hand posture as well as muscle forces. How object identity is represented in sensorimotor cortex across this transition remains unknown. In the present study, we sought to quantify the object-specific neural signals in individual neurons of the primary motor cortex (M1) and Brodmann areas 3a, 3b/1, and 2 of the somatosensory cortex in macaque monkeys. Before contact, object-specific information was carried mainly by M1 and proprioceptive area 3a, but this information did not generalize between the periods before and after contact. This observation is consistent with the abruptly changing force signals at contact affecting the assumed postural representation of the object, rather than each modality maintaining an invariant identity. After contact, despite a general decrease in firing rates, information about object identity increased and was encoded with high efficiency across sensorimotor cortex. Cutaneous areas 3b and 1, largely uninformative before contact, became highly informative once objects were grasped. Area 2, which receives both cutaneous and musculotendinous inputs, conveyed little object-specific information before contact, when it too became strongly informative, consistent with its integrative role. Thus, M1 and 3a serve as the main carriers of object information before contact, while cutaneous and integrative somatosensory circuits dominate after contact. This shift highlights the profound change in the coding of object identify in the sensorimotor cortex during contact.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2024

How different immersive environments affect intracortical brain computer interfaces

AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWAs brain-computer interface (BCI) research advances, many new applications are being developed. Tasks can be performed in different environments, and whether a BCI user can switch environments seamlessly will influence the ultimate utility of a clinical device. Here we investigate the importance of the immersiveness of the virtual environment used to train BCI decoders on the resulting decoder and its generalizability between environments. Two participants who had intracortical electrodes implanted in their precentral gyrus used a BCI to control a virtual arm, either viewed immersively through virtual reality goggles or at a distance on a flat television monitor. Each participant performed better with a decoder trained and tested in the environment they had used the most prior to the study, one for each environment type. The neural tuning to the desired movement was minimally influenced by the immersiveness of the environment. Finally, in further testing with one of the participants, we found that decoders trained in one environment generalized well to the other environment, but the order in which the environments were experienced within a session mattered. Overall, experience with an environment was more influential on performance than the immersiveness of the environment, but BCI performance generalized well after accounting for experience.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2022

Microstimulation of human somatosensory cortex evokes task-dependent, spatially patterned responses in motor cortex

AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWMotor (M1) and somatosensory (S1) cortex play a critical role in motor control but the nature of the signaling between these structures is not known. To fill this gap, we recorded - in three human participants whose hands were paralyzed as a result of a spinal cord injury - the responses evoked in the hand and arm representations of primary motor cortex (M1) while we delivered ICMS to the somatosensory cortex (S1). We found that ICMS of S1 activated some M1 neurons at short, fixed latencies, locked to each pulse in a manner consistent with monosynaptic activation. However, most of the changes in M1 firing rates were much more variable in time, suggesting a more indirect effect of the stimulation. The spatial pattern of M1 activation varied systematically depending on the stimulating electrode: S1 electrodes that elicited percepts at a given hand location tended to activate M1 neurons with movement fields at the same location. However, the indirect effects of S1 ICMS on M1 were strongly context dependent, such that the magnitude and even sign relative to baseline varied across tasks. We tested the implications of these effects for brain-control of a virtual hand, in which ICMS was used to convey tactile feedback about object interactions. While ICMS-evoked activation of M1 disrupted decoder performance, this disruption could be minimized with biomimetic stimulation, which emphasizes contact transients at the onset and offset of grasp, reduces sustained stimulation, and has been shown to convey useful contact-related information. SO_SCPLOWIGNIFICANCEC_SCPLOWMotor (M1) and somatosensory (S1) cortex play a critical role in motor control but the nature of the signaling between these structures is not known. To fill this gap, we recorded from M1 while delivering intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) to S1 of three human participants, whose hands were paralyzed by spinal cord injury. We found that ICMS activates M1 and that the motor fields of activated M1 neurons match the sensory fields of the stimulated S1 electrodes. These findings have important implications for using ICMS to convey tactile feedback for brain-controlled bionic hands. Indeed, the ICMS-evoked M1 activity worsens control of the hand. Fortunately, this effect is minimized by using biomimetic tactile feedback, which emphasizes contact transients and reduces sustained ICMS.

neuroscience↗