bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Six, J.

Publications and source records attributed to Six, J..

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Digging for meaningful connections: associations between root phenotypes and rhizosphere microbial diversity in maize

Drought threatens food security globally. Adaptive root phenotypes and microbiomes can improve maize (Zea mays L.) water uptake and tolerance to drought. However, synergisms between root phenotypes and microbiomes remain underexplored. We aimed to investigate the association between varying root phenotypes and rhizosphere microbiomes under field-scale drought. We grew 22 maize inbred lines in the field under optimal water availability and drought imposed by excluding rain with rainout shelters. We quantified grain yield and measured root architectural and anatomical phenotypes on root crown and cross-section images obtained by laser ablation tomography, respectively. We characterized rhizosphere prokaryotic and fungal communities with DNA metabarcoding of ribosomal markers. Rhizosphere microbial diversity predominantly associated with root anatomy rather than root architecture. Cortical parenchyma wall width explained 13.1% of the variance of the prokaryotic {beta}-diversity and correlated with grain yield under control conditions. Under the same conditions, number of cortical cell files and metaxylem vessels explained 1.4-2.1% of the variance of prokaryotic and fungal {beta}-diversities. No effect of the root phenotypes was observed under drought. We found 248 significant correlations between microbial taxa abundances and root anatomical phenotypes, especially cortex-related phenotypes such as number of cell files and living cortical area. Overall, a greater number of correlations was found under control conditions. We identified root phenotypes explaining a small but significant percentage of the variance of the microbial {beta}-diversity, mostly under optimal water availability. We showed that especially root anatomy is associated with rhizosphere microbial diversity in field-grown maize.

systems biology↗

Microbial resistance and resilience to drought under organic and conventional farming

The impacts of climate change, such as drought, can affect soil microbial communities. These communities are crucial for soil functioning and crop production. Organic and conventional cropping systems promote distinct soil microbiomes and soil organic carbon contents, which might maintain different capacities to mitigate drought effects on cropping systems. A field-scale drought simulation was performed in long-term organically and conventionally managed cropping systems differing in fertilization and pesticide application. The soil microbiome was assessed during and after drought in bulk soil, rhizosphere, and roots of wheat. We found that drought shifted microbial community structures, affecting fungi more strongly than prokaryotes. Microbial communities associated with crops (i.e. rhizosphere and root) were more strongly influenced by drought compared to bulk soil communities. A drought legacy effect was observed in the bulk soil after harvesting and rewetting. The resistance and resilience of the soil microbiome to severe drought did not significantly differ across the organic and conventional cropping systems, although few individual genera (e.g. Streptomyces, Rhizophagus, Actinomadura, and Aneurinibacillus) showed system-specific drought responses. All cropping systems showed relative increases in potential plant growth-promoting genera under drought. This agricultural field study indicated that fungal communities might be less resistant to drought than prokaryotic communities in cropping systems and these effects get more pronounced in closer association with plants. Organic fertilization or the reduction in pesticide application might not have the ability to buffer severe drought stress and additional farming practices might have to be incorporated to improve drought tolerance in cropping systems.

microbiology↗

How do different functional groups of crop perform in temperate silvoarable agroforestry systems? A case study

Agroforestry systems provide a number of ecosystem services and are frequently considered as a promising diversification strategy for more sustainable and climate resilient primary production. Still, less than 1% of the agricultural land in the European Union is silvoarable agroforestry. Most agroforestry field trials compare one crop type with a control in open field with no additional environmental treatments such as nutrient and water availability, thereby limiting our understanding of the ecological processes underlying the potential benefits of agroforestry for food production. The present experimental study addresses three factors (shade, fertilisation, irrigation) on three functionally different crop species (field bean, summer barley, summer rapeseed) and a C4-grass (Echinochloa crus-galli) in a Swiss agroforestry system. The objective of this study was to assess if and how crop performance (physiological traits, yield) between functional groups varies and if and how shade-induced crop yield reductions diverge between treatment combinations, aiming to provide general functional crop species and management recommendations as a guideline for a successful agroforestry practice in temperate Europe. Summer barley (-44%) and field bean (-38%) showed significant yield declines, similar to summer rapeseed with a significant biomass decline (-35%). Shade significantly increased the occurrence of lodging in barley. Rapeseed in particular performed better when fertilised (+40% biomass). Our results enable to estimate the range of potential yield losses in the competitive zone near mature trees for functionally different crop types and serve as a decision-support for species selection in temperate European agroforestry systems.

plant biology↗

Performance of a winter wheat composite cross population in two temperate agroforestry systems: a case study

In agroforestry systems (AFS), where environmental conditions are highly variable at small spatial scales, the use of uniform genetic material of a single cultivar commonly grown in monoculture cropping might not be optimal. However, the use of composite cross populations (CCPs) that contain an inherent genetic variability might be a promising approach to match the environmental variability created by trees in AFS. In this experimental trial, the performance of a CCP ( CC-2k) of winter wheat was compared to a commercial variety ( Wiwa) in a split-plot design in two AFS (Feusisberg, Wollerau) in Central Switzerland. The factor variety (p < 0.05) and the interactions of site and distance to tree (p < 0.05) and site and variety (p < 0.05) significantly affected wheat yield at the plot level. CC-2k and Wiwa yield (across all distances) amounted to 1.9 {+/-} 0.7 Mg ha-1 and 2.0 {+/-} 0.8 Mg ha-1, respectively, in Feusisberg and to 1.9 {+/-} 0.9 Mg ha-1 and 0.7 {+/-} 0.4 Mg ha-1, respectively, in Wollerau. Wiwa had a higher protein, Fe and Ca content than CC-2k. Therefore, while the CC-2k outperformed the commercial organic variety Wiwa in terms of yield in one of the two AFS, Wiwa outperformed CC-2k in terms of quality. The composite cross population might be better adapted to the heterogenous environment of agroforestry systems but fails to reach the high-quality product of modern elite cultivars. Further improvements in terms of quality might make CCPs highly interesting for diversified agricultural systems with larger environmental heterogeneity than common monoculture cropping systems.

plant biology↗

Positive effects of crop diversity on productivity driven by changes in soil microbial composition

Intensive agriculture has major negative impacts on ecosystem diversity and functioning, including that of soils. The associated reduction of soil biodiversity and essential soil functions, such as nutrient cycling, can restrict plant growth and crop yield. By increasing plant diversity in agricultural systems, intercropping could be a promising way to foster soil microbial diversity and functioning. However, plant-microbe interactions and the extent to which they influence crop yield under field conditions are still poorly understood. In this study, we performed an extensive intercropping experiment using eight crop species and 40 different crop mixtures to investigate how crop diversity affects soil microbial diversity and functions, and whether these changes subsequently affect crop yield. Experiments were carried out in mesocosms under natural conditions in Switzerland and in Spain, two countries with drastically different soils and climate, and our crop communities included either one, two or four species. We sampled and sequenced soil microbial DNA to assess soil microbial diversity, and measured soil basal respiration as a proxy for soil activity. Results indicate that in Switzerland, increasing crop diversity led to shifts in soil microbial community composition, and in particular to an increase of several plant-growth promoting microbes, such as members of the bacterial phylum Actinobacteria. These shifts in community composition subsequently led to a 15 and 35% increase in crop yield in 2 and 4-species mixtures, respectively. This suggests that the positive effects of crop diversity on crop productivity can partially be explained by changes in soil microbial composition. However, the effects of crop diversity on soil microbes were relatively small compared to the effects of abiotic factors such as fertilization (3 times larger) or soil moisture (3 times larger). Furthermore, these processes were context-dependent: in Spain, where soil resources were limited, soil microbial communities did not respond to crop diversity, and their effect on crop yield was less strong. This research highlights the potential beneficial role of soil microbial communities in intercropping systems, while also reflecting on the relative importance of crop diversity compared to abiotic drivers of microbiomes, thereby emphasizing the context-dependence of crop-microbe relationships.

ecology↗

Mapping the impacts of hurricanes Maria and Irma on banana production area in the Dominican Republic

Extreme weather events can have devastating impacts on agricultural systems, and the livelihoods that depend on them. Tools for rapid, comprehensive and cost-effective assessment of impacts, especially if carried out remotely, can be of great value in planning systematic recovery of production, as well as assessing risks from future events. Here, we use openly available remote sensing data to quantify the impacts of hurricanes Irma and Maria in 2017 on banana production area in the Dominican Republic -- the worlds largest producer of organic bananas. Further, we assess the risk to current production area if a similar extreme event were to re-occur. Hurricane associated damage was mapped using a simple change detection algorithm applied to Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) data over the three main banana growing provinces of northern Dominican Republic, i.e. Monte Cristi, Valverde and Santiago. The map of hurricane affected area was overlaid with banana plantation distributions for 2017 and 2019 that were mapped (accuracy = 99.8%) using a random forest classifier, and a combination of SAR and multi-spectral satellite data. Our results show that 11.35% of banana plantation area was affected by hurricane damage in 2017. Between 2017 and 2019, there was a high turnover of plantation area, but with a net gain of 10.8%. However, over a quarter (26.9%) of new plantation area spatially overlapped with regions which had seen flooding or damage from hurricanes in 2017. Our results indicate that banana production systems in northern Dominican Republic saw extensive damage in the aftermath of hurricanes Irma and Maria. While production area has recovered since then, a substantial proportion of new plantations, and a greater fraction of production area in general, occur at locations at risk from future extreme events.

ecology↗