Assessment of ecological fidelity of human microbiome-associated mice in observational studies and an interventional trial
Composition and function of the gut microbiome is associated with diverse health conditions and treatment responses. Human microbiota-associated (HMA) mouse models are used to establish causal links for these associations but have important limitations. We assessed the fidelity of HMA mouse models to recapitulate ecological responses to a microbial consortium using stools collected from a human clinical trial. HMA mice were generated using different routes of consortium exposure and their ecological features were compared to human donors by metagenomic sequencing. HMA mice were more similar in gut composition to other mice than their respective human donors, with taxa including Akkermansia muciniphila and Bacteroides species enriched in mouse recipients. A limited repertoire of microbes was able to engraft into HMA mice regardless of route of consortium exposure. In publicly available HMA mouse datasets from four distinct health conditions, we confirmed our observation that a taxonomically restricted set of microbes reproducibly engrafts in HMA mice and observed that stool microbiome composition of HMA mice were more like other mice than their human donor. Our data suggest that HMA mice are limited models to assess the ecological impact of microbial consortia, with ecological effects in HMA mice being more strongly associated with host species than donor stool ecology or ecological responses to treatment in humans. Comparisons to published studies suggest this may be due to comparatively large host-species effects that overwhelm ecological effects of treatment in humans that HMA models aim to recapitulate. ImportanceHuman microbiota-associated (HMA) mice are models that better represent human gut ecology compared to conventional laboratory mice and are commonly used to test the effect of the gut microbiome on disease or treatment response. We evaluated the fidelity of using HMA mice as avatars of ecological response to a human microbial consortium, MET4. Our results show that HMA mice in our cohort and across other published studies are more similar to each other than the human donors or inoculum they are derived from and harbour a taxonomically restricted gut microbiome. These findings highlight the limitations of HMA mice in evaluating the ecological effects of complex human microbiome-targeting interventions, such as microbial consortia.