Sirami, C. | bioRxiv Science

bioRxiv2026

Carabid beetle communities along a gradient of agroecological systems: disentangling the roles of pesticides and soil tillage

The potential of alternative agricultural systems, such as organic or conservation agriculture, for biodiversity restoration has been widely investigated. However, variability of practices within each of these two categories of agricultural system has rarely been accounted for. Furthermore, these systems have most often been studied separately, isolating either organic or conservation agriculture (itself often reduced to a soil tillage reduction), and rarely analyzing these systems side by side. This study attempts to disentangle these multiple interrelationships by sampling carabid beetles in a network of 48 commercial Belgian farms including organic agriculture (OA), conservation agriculture (CA), farms combining the two approaches (OCA) and farms applying conventional practices (CVA). In each farm, we sampled carabids using pitfall and emergence traps in one winter cereal field and collected a detailed description of crop management practices. We found that community composition was primarily structured by seasonality early in the season (March, April) followed by convergence (May, June) driven by the aggregation of the most dominant species. Based on agroecosystem classification, organic certification (i.e., the absence of synthetic pesticide use) exerted a twofold stronger effect than application of conservation agriculture principles (i.e., reduced or no soil tillage) on carabid beetle community composition. Notably, OCA supported carabid assemblages that were structurally distinct from those of CA and CVA. Furthermore, carabid communities associated with OA differed significantly in composition from those of CVA. Observed and estimated species richness were also significantly higher in OCA than in CA and CVA, while OA differed from CVA only for observed richness. Beyond differences among agricultural systems, community responses were associated with specific management practices, which explained nearly a quarter of the compositional variation with significant influence of the duration since organic conversion and the frequency of synthetic pesticide application. Carabid abundances were negatively affected by synthetic pesticides and moldboard ploughing, whereas richness was more strongly related to the time since conversion to OA, cover crops, and organic amendments. Overall, these results position synthetic inputs and time since conversion as the main filters over carabid communities. Our study highlights the importance of jointly considering system level analyses and detailed management practices to better understand the complex relationships between agricultural practices and carabid communities.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2022

Field margins as substitute habitat for the conservation of birds in agricultural wetlands

Breeding birds in agricultural landscapes have declined considerably since the 1950s and the beginning of agricultural intensification in Europe. Given the increasing pressure on agricultural land, it is necessary to identify conservation measures that consume little productive land. We tested the compensation hypothesis which states that field margins may represent substitute habitats for bird species in agricultural wetlands. We monitored bird species in 86 crop fields in rice paddy landscapes of Camargue (southern France), a wetland of international importance for birds. We investigated whether the area of three types of field margins (reed strips, grass strips and hedgerows) within a 500 meter buffer around the centroid of each crop fields had an effect on the abundance of bird species from three groups defined based on their primary habitat (reedbeds, grasslands, and forest edge species). We controlled for the area of each type of semi-natural habitat (wetlands, grasslands, and woodlands), crop diversity (rice, wheat, alfalfa, rape, and market gardening) and mean crop field size. Results show partial support of the compensation hypothesis with species-dependent responses to primary and substitute habitat area. Some species within the reedbed and grassland bird guilds are favored by the area of their primary habitat as well as by the area of field margins, in line with the compensation hypothesis. Eurasian reed warbler is favored by the area of both wetlands and reed strips. Corn bunting is favored by grassland and grass strip areas. We could not confirm the compensation hypothesis for other species. However, this may be due to the fact that most of these species did not respond to their primary habitat. These results therefore suggest that field margins may represent substitute habitats for some species but further studies, in contexts where species are strongly associated with their primary habitat, would be needed to confirm the generality of this hypothesis. Our results also suggest that species response to increasing the area of a field margin type may vary among guilds and even within guilds. Therefore, it may be difficult to favor all species within a given landscape and management actions may need to be tailored to whichever species are locally associated with the highest conservation priority. To tackle this challenge, it may be necessary to design landscape management actions at different spatial scales.

ecology↗