bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Sindhania, A.

Publications and source records attributed to Sindhania, A..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

First report of classical knockdown resistance (kdr) mutation, L1014F, in human head louse Pediculus humanus capitis (Phthiraptera: Anoplura)

There are at least three known knockdown resistance (kdr) mutations reported globally in the human head louse Pediculus humanus capitis (Phthiraptera: Anoplura) that are associated with reduced sensitivity to pyrethroids. However, prevalence of kdr mutation is not known in the Indian subcontinent. To identify kdr mutations in the Indian population, the genomic region of the voltage-gated sodium channel gene encompassing IIS1-2 linker to IIS6 segments was PCR-amplified and sequenced from P. humanus capitis samples collected from different geographic localities of India. DNA sequencing revealed the presence of four kdr mutations, i.e., M827I, T929I, L932F and L1014F. The presence of a classical kdr mutation, L1014F, a most widely reported mutation across insect-taxa associated with kdr-trait, is being reported for the first time in P. humanus capitis.

molecular biology↗

Evaluation of odorant-binding protein-1 as a molecular marker for identifying biological forms and delimitating sibling species of Anopheles stephensi

BackgroundAnopheles stephensi, an invasive malaria vector, has been reported to have three biological forms identifiable mainly based on the number of ridges present on the eggs floats. Recently, the first intron of the odorant-binding protein-1 (AsteObp1) has been introduced as a molecular marker for the identification of these forms, and based on this marker, the presence of three putative sibling species (designated as species A, B and C) has been proposed. However, there is no data on the association of proposed markers with biological form or putative species on field populations. MethodsField collected and laboratory-reared An. stephensi were characterized for biological forms based on the number of ridges on the egg s float. DNA sequencing of the partial AsteObp1 gene of An. stephensi individuals were performed by Sangers method, either directly or after cloning with a plasmid vector. Additionally, AsteObp1 sequences of various laboratory lines of An. stephensi were retrieved from a public sequence database. ResultsAsteObp1 intron-1 in Indian An. stephensi populations are highly polymorphic with the presence of more than 13 haplotypes exhibiting nucleotides as well as length-polymorphism (90-to-121 bp). No specific haplotype or a group of closely related haplotypes of intron-1 was found associated with any biological form identified morphologically. High heterozygosity for this marker with a low inbreeding coefficient in field and laboratory populations indicates that this marker is not suitable for the delimitation of putative sibling species, at least in Indian populations. ConclusionsAsteObp1 cannot serve as a marker for identifying biological forms of An. stephensi or putative sibling species in Indian populations.

molecular biology↗

Are members of the Anopheles fluviatilis complex conspecific?

Anopheles fluviatilis sensu lato, a primary malaria vector in India, was identified to be comprised of four cryptic species, provisionally designated as species S, T, U and V. However, Kumar et al. (Mol Ecol Resour, 2013;13:354-61) considered all of the then known three members of this species complex (S, T and U) conspecific. The specific status of species S and T was refuted based on the lack of sufficient barcode gap in mitochondrial-CO1 and the perceived presence of heterozygotes in populations as detected through one of the two species-specific PCR assays employed for the cryptic species identification. The existence of species U was refuted claiming that earlier investigations have already refuted their existence. This conclusion is concerning because of the differential public health implications of members of the Fluviatilis Complex. Here we discuss problems associated with the CO1-based barcode approach for delimitation of cryptic species, the perceived heterozygosity between species S and T based on a species-specific PCR assay, and interpretation of published reports. We demonstrated that fixed differences do exist in the ITS2-rDNA sequence of species S and T with no evidence of heterozygotes in sympatric populations and, that the observed heterozygosity by Kumar et al. in the ITS2-based species diagnostic PCR is due to the high mispriming tendency of the T-specific primer with species S. We infer that mitochondrial DNA-based barcoding gap, an arbitrary threshold recommended for species delimitation, alone, is inadequate to delimit the members of An. fluviatilis complex.

molecular biology↗

Molecular forms of Anopheles subpictus s.l. and Anopheles sundaicus s.l. in the Indian subcontinent

BackgroundAnopheles subpictus s.l. and Anopheles sundaicus s.l. are closely related species, each comprising of several sibling species. Ambiguities exist in the classification of these two nominal species and the specific status of members of An. subpictus complex. Identifying fixed molecular forms and mapping their spatial distribution will help in resolving the taxonomic ambiguities and understanding their relative epidemiological significance. MethodsDNA sequencing of Internal Transcribed Spacer-2 (ITS2), 28S-rDNA (D1-to-D3 domains) and cytochrome oxidase-II of morphologically identified specimens of two nominal species, An. subpictus s.l. and An. sundaicus s.l. collected from the Indian subcontinent, was performed and subjected to genetic distance and molecular phylogenetic analyses. ResultsMolecular characterization of mosquitoes for rDNA revealed the presence of two molecular forms of An. sundaicus s.l. (identified as An. epiroticus s.s. and An. sundaicus D) and three molecular forms of An. subpictus s.l. (provisionally designated as Form A, B and C) in the Indian subcontinent. Phylogenetic analyses revealed two distinct clades: (i) subpictus clade, with a single molecular form of An. subpictus (Form A) prevalent in mainland India and Sri Lanka, and (ii) sundaicus clade, comprising of members of Sundaicus Complex., two molecular forms of An. subpictus s.l., (Form B and C) prevalent in coastal areas or islands, and molecular forms reported from Thailand and Indonesia. Based on the number of float-ridges on eggs, all An. subpictus molecular Form B were classified as Species B whereas majority (80%) of the molecular Form A were classified as sibling species C. Fixed intragenomic sequence variation in ITS2 with the presence of two haplotypes was found in molecular Form A throughout its distribution. ConclusionA total of three molecular forms of An. subpictus s.l. and two molecular forms of An. sundaicus s.l. were recorded in the Indian subcontinent. Phylogenetically, two forms of An. subpictus s.l., (Form B and C) prevalent in coastal areas or islands in the Indian subcontinent and molecular forms reported from Southeast Asia are members of Sundaicus Complex. Molecular Form A of An. subpictus is distantly related to all other forms and deserve a distinct specific status. Presence of An. epiroticus in Indian territory is recorded for the first time.

zoology↗