Simmerman, R. | bioRxiv Science

bioRxiv2021

Rules for designing protein fold switches and their implications for the folding code

We have engineered switches between the three most common small folds, 3, 4{beta}+, and /{beta}-plait, referred to here as A, B, and S, respectively. Mutations were introduced into the natural S protein until sequences were created that have a stable S-fold in their longer ([~]90 amino acid) form and have an alternative fold (either A or B) in their shorter (56 amino acid) form. Five sequence pairs were designed and key structures were determined using NMR spectroscopy. Each protein pair is 100% identical in the 56 amino acid region of overlap. Several rules for engineering switches emerged. First, designing one sequence with good native state interactions in two folds requires care but is feasible. Once this condition is met, fold populations are determined by the stability of the embedded A- or B-fold relative to the S-fold and the conformational propensities of the ends that are generated in the switch to the embedded fold. If the stabilities of the embedded fold and the longer fold are similar, conformation is highly sensitive to mutation so that even a single amino acid substitution can radically shift the population to the alternative fold. The results provide insight into why dimorphic sequences can be engineered and sometimes exist in nature, while most natural protein sequences populate single folds. Proteins may evolve toward unique folds because dimorphic sequences generate interactions that destabilize and can produce aberrant functions. Thus, two-state behavior may result from natures negative design rather than being an inherent property of the folding code. Significance StatementWe establish general rules for designing protein fold switches by engineering dimorphic sequences that link the three most common small folds. The fact that switches can be engineered in arbitrary and common protein folds, sheds light on several important questions: 1) What is the generality of fold switching? 2) What types of folds are amenable to switching? 3) What properties are shared by sequences that can fold into two completely different structures? This work has implications for understanding how amino acid sequence encodes structure, how proteins evolve, how mutation is related to disease, and how function is annotated to sequences of unknown structure. ClassificationBiological Sciences: Biochemistry; Physical Sciences: Biophysics and Computational Biology

biophysics↗

bioRxiv2020

Engineering protein-specific proteases: targeting active RAS

We describe the design, kinetic properties, and structures of engineered subtilisin proteases that degrade the active form of RAS by cleaving a conserved sequence in switch 2. RAS is a signaling protein that, when mutated, drives a third of human cancers. To generate high specificity for the RAS target sequence, the active site was modified to be dependent on a cofactor (imidazole or nitrite) and protease sub-sites were engineered to create a linkage between substrate and cofactor binding. Selective proteolysis of active RAS arises from a 2-step process wherein sub-site interactions promote productive binding of the cofactor, enabling cleavage. Proteases engineered in this way specifically cleave active RAS in vitro, deplete the level of RAS in a bacterial reporter system, and also degrade RAS in human cell culture. Although these proteases target active RAS, the underlying design principles are fundamental and will be adaptable to many target proteins.

biochemistry↗