bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Siller-Farfan, J. A.

Publications and source records attributed to Siller-Farfan, J. A..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Using CombiCells, a platform enabling titration and combinatorial display of cell surface ligands, to investigate the sensitivity and costimulatory requirements of TCRs and CARs

Understanding how cellular decisions by receptor/ligand interactions at cell/cell interface has been challenging because it is difficult to independently vary the surface density of multiple ligands. Here, we exploit the SpyCatcher/SpyTag split-protein system for rapid combinatorial display of native ligands on cells (Combicells). We use this platform to assess T cell antigen sensitivity and the impact of T cell co-stimulation/co-inhibition receptors. The TCR displayed much greater sensitivity to pMHC than CARs and BiTES did to CD19. While TCR sensitivity was greatly enhanced by CD2 ligand, CAR sensitivity to CD19 was primarily but more modestly enhanced by LFA-1 ligand. Lastly, we show that the PD-1/ligand engagement inhibited T cell activation triggered solely by TCR/pMHC interactions, as well as the amplified activation induced by CD2 and CD28 co-stimulation. The ability to easily produce cells with different concentrations and combinations of ligands should accelerate the study of receptor/ligand interactions at cell/cell interfaces. Graphical abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=177 SRC="FIGDIR/small/545075v2_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (34K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@d1ec95org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@33c0forg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@5bfed7org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1b80ee2_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG One sentence summaryUsing CombiCells, a platform for the combinatorial display of cell surface ligands, to compare T cell antigen sensitivity mediated by TCRs, CARs, and BiTEs and its dependence on co-stimulation/co-inhibition receptor ligands

immunology↗

Inefficient exploitation of accessory receptors reduces the sensitivity of chimeric antigen receptors.

Chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) can re-direct T cells to target abnormal cells but their activity is limited by a profound defect in antigen sensitivity, the source of which remains unclear. Here we show that, while CARs have a >100-fold lower antigen sensitivity compared to the T cell receptor (TCR) when antigen is presented on antigen-presenting-cells (APCs), they have nearly identical sensitivity when antigen is presented as purified protein on artificial surfaces. We next measured the impact of engaging accessory receptors (CD2, LFA-1, CD28, CD27, 4-1BB) on antigen sensitivity by adding their purified ligands. Unexpectedly, we found that engaging CD2 or LFA-1 improved TCR antigen sensitivity by 125 and 22-fold, respectively, but only improved CAR sensitivity by <5-fold. This differential effect of CD2 and LFA-1 engagement on TCR versus CAR sensitivity was confirmed using APCs. We found that sensitivity to antigen can be partially restored by fusing the CAR variable domains to the TCR CD3{varepsilon} subunit (also known as a TRuC), and fully restored by exchanging the CAR variable domains with the TCR{beta} variable domains (also known as STAR or HIT). Importantly, these improvements in TRuC and STAR/HIT sensitivity can be predicted by their enhanced ability to exploit CD2 and LFA-1. These findings demonstrate that the CAR sensitivity defect is a result of their inefficient exploitation of accessory receptors, and suggest approaches to increase sensitivity.

immunology↗

Synthetic Antigen Presenting cells reveal the diversity and functional specialization of extracellular vesicles composing the fourth signal of T cell immunological synapses.

The T cell Immunological Synapse (IS) is a pivotal hub for the regulation of adaptive immunity by endowing the exchange of information between cells engaged in physical contacts. Beyond the integration of antigen (signal one), co-stimulation (signal two), and cytokines (signal three), the IS facilitates the delivery of T-cell effector assemblies including supramolecular attack particles (SMAPs) and extracellular vesicles (EVs). How these particulate outputs differ among T -cell subsets and how subcellular compartments and signals exchanged at the synapse contribute to their composition is not fully understood. Here we harnessed bead-supported lipid bilayers (BSLBs) as a tailorable and versatile technology for the study of synaptic particle biogenesis and composition in different T-cell subsets, including CART. These synthetic antigen-presenting cells (APCs) facilitated the characterisation of trans-synaptic vesicles (tSV) as a heterogeneous population of EVs comprising among others PM-derived synaptic ectosomes and CD63+ exosomes. We harnessed BSLB to unveil the factors influencing the vesicular release of CD40L, as a model effector, identifying CD40 trans presentation, T-cell activation, ESCRT upregulation/recruitment, antigen density/potency, co-repression by PD-1 ligands, and its processing by ADAM10 as major determinants. Further, BSLB made possible the comparison of microRNA (miR) species associated with tSV and steadily released EVs. Altogether, our data provide evidence for a higher specialisation of tSV which are enriched not only in effector immune receptors but also in miR and RNA-binding proteins. Considering the molecular uniqueness and functional complexity of the tSV output, which is also accompanied by SMAPs, we propose their classification as signal four. Graphical abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=198 HEIGHT=200 SRC="FIGDIR/small/445691v3_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (67K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@100f3aorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@57adfforg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@6052fcorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1e85c21_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG HighlightsO_LIBead Supported Lipid Bilayers (BSLB) reconstituting antigen-presenting cells support synapse assembly by T cells and the release of effector particles. C_LIO_LIBSLB facilitate the dissection of the cellular machineries and synapse composition shaping the released tSV. C_LIO_LItSV and their steadily released counterparts have a different composition. TSV show a higher enrichment of effectors including immune receptors, miR, RNA- and other nucleic acid-binding proteins, than EVs. C_LI

immunology↗