Silbernagel, K. G. | bioRxiv Science

bioRxiv2023

Markerless motion capture estimates of lower extremity kinematics and kinetics are comparable to marker-based across 8 movements

Motion analysis is essential for assessing in-vivo human biomechanics. Marker-based motion capture is the standard to analyze human motion, but the inherent inaccuracy and practical challenges limit its utility in large-scale and real-world applications. Markerless motion capture has shown promise to overcome these practical barriers. However, its fidelity in quantifying joint kinematics and kinetics has not been verified across multiple common human movements. In this study, we concurrently captured marker-based and markerless motion data on 10 healthy subjects performing 8 daily living and exercise movements. We calculated the correlation (Rxy) and root-mean-square difference (RMSD) between markerless and marker-based estimates of ankle dorsi-plantarflexion, knee flexion, and three-dimensional hip kinematics (angles) and kinetics (moments) during each movement. Estimates from markerless motion capture matched closely with marker-based in ankle and knee joint angles (Rxy [≥] 0.877, RMSD [≤] 5.9{degrees}) and moments (Rxy [≥] 0.934, RMSD [≤] 2.66 % height x weight). High outcome comparability means the practical benefits of markerless motion capture can simplify experiments and facilitate large-scale analyses. Hip angles and moments demonstrated more differences between the two systems (RMSD: 6.7{degrees} - 15.9{degrees} and up to 7.15 % height x weight), especially during rapid movements such as running. Markerless motion capture appears to improve the accuracy of hip-related measures, yet more research is needed for validation. We encourage the biomechanics community to continue verifying, validating, and establishing best practices for markerless motion capture, which holds exciting potential to advance collaborative biomechanical research and expand real-world assessments needed for clinical translation.

bioengineering↗

bioRxiv2020

Success Criteria for Preclinical Testing of Cell-Instructive Hydrogels for Tendon Regeneration

Tendon injuries are difficult to heal in part because intrinsic tendon healing, which is dominated by scar tissue formation, does not effectively regenerate the native structure and function of healthy tendon. Further, many current treatment strategies also fall short of producing regenerated tendon with the native properties of healthy tendon. There is increasing interest in the use of cell-instructive strategies to limit the intrinsic fibrotic response following injury and improve the regenerative capacity of tendon in vivo. We have established multi-functional, cell-instructive hydrogels for treating injured tendon that afford tunable control over the biomechanical, biochemical, and structural properties of the cell microenvironments. Specifically, we incorporated integrin-binding domains (RGDS) and assembled multi-functional collagen mimetic peptides (mfCMPs) that enable cell adhesion and elongation of stem cells within synthetic hydrogels of designed biomechanical properties and evaluated these materials using targeted success criteria developed for testing in mechanically-demanding environments like tendon healing. The in vitro and in situ success criteria were determined based on systematic reviews of the most commonly reported outcome measures of hydrogels for tendon repair and established standards for testing of biomaterials. We then showed, using validation experiments, that multi-functional and synthetic hydrogels meet these criteria. Specifically, these hydrogels have mechanical properties comparable to developing tendon; are non-cytotoxic both in 2D bolus exposure (hydrogel components) and 3D encapsulation (full hydrogel); are formed, retained, and visualized within tendon defects over time (two-weeks); and provide mechanical support to tendon defects at the time of injection and in situ formation. Ultimately, the in vitro and in situ success criteria evaluated in this study were designed for preclinical research to rigorously test the potential to achieve successful tendon repair prior to in vivo testing and indicate the promise of multi-functional and synthetic hydrogels for continued translation. IMPACT STATEMENTTendon healing results in a weak scar that forms due to poor cell-mediated repair of the injured tissue. Treatments that tailor the instructions experienced by cells during healing afford opportunities to regenerate the healthy tendon. Engineered cell-instructive cues, including the biomechanical, biochemical, and structural properties of the cell microenvironment, within multi-functional synthetic hydrogels are promising therapeutic strategies for tissue regeneration. In this paper, the preclinical efficacy of multi-functional synthetic hydrogels for tendon repair is tested against rigorous in vitro and in situ success criteria. This study indicates the promise for continued preclinical translation of synthetic hydrogels for tissue regeneration.

bioengineering↗