Biology subjects

Shore, D.

Publications and source records attributed to Shore, D..

10 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2023

K29-linked unanchored polyubiquitin chains disrupt ribosome biogenesis and direct ribosomal proteins to the Intranuclear Quality control compartment (INQ)

Ribosome assembly requires precise coordination between the production and assembly of ribosomal components. Mutations in ribosomal proteins that inhibit the assembly process or ribosome function are often associated with Ribosomopathies, some of which are linked to defects in proteostasis. In this study, we examine the interplay between several yeast proteostasis enzymes, including deubiquitylases (DUBs), Ubp2 and Ubp14, and E3 ligases, Ufd4 and Hul5, and we explore their roles in the regulation of the cellular levels of K29-linked unanchored polyubiquitin (polyUb) chains. Accumulating K29-linked unanchored polyUb chains associate with maturing ribosomes to disrupt their assembly, activate the Ribosome assembly stress response (RASTR), and lead to the sequestration of ribosomal proteins at the Intranuclear Quality control compartment (INQ). These findings reveal the physiological relevance of INQ and provide insights into mechanisms of cellular toxicity associated with Ribosomopathies.

cell biology↗

bioRxiv2022

Not1 and Not4 inversely determine mRNA solubility that sets the dynamics of co-translational events

BackgroundThe Ccr4-Not complex is most well known as the major eukaryotic deadenylase. However, several studies have uncovered roles of the complex, in particular of the Not subunits, unrelated to deadenylation and relevant for translation. In particular, the existence of Not condensates that regulate translation elongation dynamics have been reported. Typical studies that evaluate translation efficiency rely on soluble extracts obtained after disruption of cells and ribosome profiling. Yet cellular mRNAs in condensates can be actively translated and may not be present in such extracts. ResultsIn this work, by analyzing soluble and insoluble mRNA decay intermediates in yeast, we determine that insoluble mRNAs are enriched for ribosomes dwelling at non-optimal codons compared to soluble mRNAs. mRNA decay is higher for soluble RNAs, but the proportion of co-translational degradation relative to the overall mRNA decay is higher for insoluble mRNAs. We show that depletion of Not1 and Not4 inversely impact mRNA solubilities and, for soluble mRNAs, ribosome dwelling according to codon optimality. Depletion of Not4 solubilizes mRNAs with lower non-optimal codon content and higher expression that are rendered insoluble by Not1 depletion. By contrast, depletion of Not1 solubilizes mitochondrial mRNAs, which are rendered insoluble upon Not4 depletion. ConclusionOur results reveal that mRNA solubility defines dynamics of co-translation events and is oppositely regulated by Not1 and Not4, a mechanism that we additionally determine may already be set by Not1 promoter association in the nucleus.

molecular biology↗

bioRxiv2020

Mechanisms Coordinating Ribosomal Protein Gene Transcription in Response to Stress

While expression of ribosomal protein genes (RPGs) in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae has been extensively studied, a longstanding enigma persists regarding their co-regulation under fluctuating nutrient and stress conditions. Most (<90%) of RPG promoters display one of two distinct arrangements of a core set of transcription factors (TFs; Rap1, Fhl1 and Ifh1) and are further differentiated by the presence or absence of the HMGB box protein Hmo1. However, a third group of promoters appears not to bind any of these proteins, raising the question of how the whole suite of genes is co-regulated. We demonstrate that all RPGs are regulated by two distinct, but complementary mechanisms driven by the TFs Ifh1 and Sfp1, both of which are required for maximal expression in optimal conditions and coordinated down-regulation upon stress. At the majority of RPG promoters Ifh1-dependent regulation predominates, whereas Sfp1 plays the major role at all other genes. We also uncovered an unexpected, protein homeostasis-dependent binding property of Hmo1 at a large subset of RPG promoters. Finally, we show that the Ifh1 paralog Crf1, previously described as a transcriptional repressor, can act as a constitutive RPG activator in the W303 strain background when overexpressed. Our study thus provides a more complete picture of RPG regulation and may serve as a paradigm for unravelling RPG regulation in multicellular eukaryotes.

molecular biology↗

bioRxiv2019

Fork Pausing Complex Engages Topoisomerases at the Replisome

Replication forks temporarily or terminally pause at hundreds of hard-to-replicate regions around the genome. A conserved pair of budding yeast replisome components Tof1-Csm3 (fission yeast Swi1-Swi3 and human TIMELESS-TIPIN) acts as a molecular brake and promotes fork slowdown at proteinaceous replication fork barriers (RFBs), while the accessory helicase Rrm3 assists the replisome in removing protein obstacles. Here we show that Tof1-Csm3 complex promotes fork pausing independently of Rrm3 helicase by recruiting topoisomerase I (Top1) to the replisome. Topoisomerase II (Top2) partially compensates for the pausing decrease in cells when Top1 is lost from the replisome. The C-terminus of Tof1 is specifically required for Top1 recruitment to the replisome and fork pausing but not for DNA replication checkpoint (DRC) activation. We propose that forks pause at proteinaceous RFBs through a sTOP mechanism ( slowing down with TOPoisomerases I-II), which we show also contributes to protecting cells from topoisomerase-blocking agents.

molecular biology↗

bioRxiv2019

Opposing chromatin remodelers control transcription initiation frequency and start site selection

Precise nucleosome organization at eukaryotic promoters is thought to be generated by multiple chromatin remodeler (CR) enzymes and to affect transcription initiation. Using an integrated analysis of chromatin remodeler binding and nucleosome displacement activity following rapid remodeler depletion, we investigate the interplay between these enzymes and their impact on transcription in budding yeast. We show that many promoters are acted upon by multiple CRs that operate either cooperatively or in opposition to position the key transcription start site-associated +1 nucleosome. Functional assays suggest that +1 nucleosome positioning often reflects a trade-off between maximizing RNA Polymerase II recruitment and minimizing transcription initiation at incorrect sites. Finally, we show that nucleosome movement following CR inactivation usually results from the activity of another CR and that in the absence of any remodeling activity +1 nucleosomes maintain their positions. Our results provide a detailed picture of fundamental mechanisms linking promoter nucleosome architecture to transcription initiation.

molecular biology↗

bioRxiv2019

The mechanistic basis for chromatin invasion and remodeling by the yeast pioneer transcription factor Rap1

Pioneer transcription factors (pTFs) bind to target sites within compact chromatin initiating chromatin remodeling and controlling the recruitment of downstream factors. The mechanisms by which pTFs overcome the chromatin barrier are not well understood. Here we reveal, using single-molecule fluorescence approaches, how the yeast transcription factor Rap1 invades and remodels chromatin. Using a reconstituted chromatin system replicating yeast promoter architecture we demonstrate that Rap1 can bind nucleosomal DNA within a chromatin fiber, but with shortened dwell times compared to naked DNA. Moreover, we show that Rap1 binding opens chromatin fiber structure by inhibiting nucleosome-nucleosome contacts. Finally, we reveal that Rap1 collaborates with the chromatin remodeler RSC to destabilize promoter nucleosomes, paving the way to form long-lived bound states on now exposed DNA. Together, our results provide a mechanistic view of how Rap1 gains access and opens chromatin, thereby establishing an active promoter architecture and controlling gene expression.

biophysics↗

bioRxiv2019

A ribosome assembly stress response regulates transcription to maintain proteome homeostasis

Ribosome biogenesis is a complex and energy-demanding process requiring tight coordination of ribosomal RNA (rRNA) and ribosomal protein (RP) production. Alteration of any step in this process may impact growth by leading to proteotoxic stress. Although the transcription factor Hsf1 has emerged as a central regulator of proteostasis, how its activity is coordinated with ribosome biogenesis is unknown. Here we show that arrest of ribosome biogenesis in the budding yeast S. cerevisiae triggers rapid activation of a highly specific stress pathway that coordinately up-regulates Hsf1 target genes and down-regulates RP genes. Activation of Hsf1 target genes requires neo-synthesis of RPs, which accumulate in an insoluble fraction, leading to sequestration of the RP transcriptional activator Ifh1. Our data suggest that levels of newly-synthetized RPs, imported into the nucleus but not yet assembled into ribosomes, work to continuously balance Hsf1 and Ifh1 activity, thus guarding against proteotoxic stress during ribosome assembly.

molecular biology↗

bioRxiv2018

Sfp1 regulates transcriptional networks driving cell growth and division through multiple promoter binding modes

Understanding how transcriptional programs help to coordinate cell growth and division is an important unresolved problem. Here we report that the nutrient- and stress-regulated transcription factor Sfp1 is rate-limiting for expression of several large classes of genes involved in yeast cell growth, including ribosomal protein, ribosome biogenesis, and snoRNA genes. Remarkably, the spectrum of Sfp1 transcription effects is concordant with a combination of chromatin immunoprecipitation and chromatin endogenous cleavage binding analyses, which together provide evidence for two distinct modes of Sfp1 promoter binding, one requiring a co-factor and the other a specific DNA-recognition motif. In addition to growth-related genes, Sfp1 binds to and regulates the promoters of cell cycle \"START\" regulon genes, including the key G1/S cyclins CLN1 and CLN2. Our findings suggest that Sfp1 acts as a master regulator of cell growth and cell size by coordinating the expression of genes implicated in mass accumulation and cell division.

molecular biology↗

bioRxiv2018

General Regulatory Factors control the fidelity of transcription by restricting non-coding and ectopic initiation

The fidelity of transcription initiation is essential for accurate gene expression, but the determinants of start site selection are not fully understood. Rap1 and other General Regulatory Factors (GRFs) control the expression of many genes in yeast. We show that depletion of these factors induces widespread ectopic transcription initiation within promoters. This generates many novel non-coding RNAs and transcript isoforms with diverse stability, profoundly altering the coding potential of the transcriptome. Ectopic transcription initiation strongly correlates with altered nucleosome positioning. We show that Rap1 sterically constrains nucleosomes as its mere binding to the DNA can be sufficient for restoration normal nucleosome positioning, transcription initiation and gene expression. These results demonstrate an essential role for GRFs in the fidelity of transcription initiation and in the suppression of pervasive transcription, redefining current models of their function. They have general implications for the mechanism of transcription initiation and the control of gene expression.\n\nHIGHLIGHTSO_LIRap1, Abf1 and Reb1 control the fidelity of transcription initiation and suppress pervasive transcription\nC_LIO_LIWidespread ectopic transcription initiation in Rap1-deficient cells induces variegated alterations in gene expression\nC_LIO_LIAltered nucleosome positioning in GRFs-defective cells correlate with ectopic transcription initiation.\nC_LIO_LIRap1 controls nucleosomes positioning and transcription initiation at least partially by a steric hindrance mechanism\nC_LI

genomics↗

bioRxiv2018

Sequence-directed action of RSC remodeler and pioneer factors positions +1 nucleosome to facilitate transcription

Accessible chromatin is important for RNA polymerase II recruitment and transcription initiation at eukaryotic promoters. We investigated the mechanistic links between promoter DNA sequence, nucleosome positioning and transcription. Our results indicate that precise positioning of the transcription start site-associated +1 nucleosome in yeast is critical for efficient TBP binding, and is driven by two key factors, the essential chromatin remodeler RSC and a small set of ubiquitous pioneer transcription factors. We find no evidence for recruitment of RSC by pioneer factors, but show instead that the strength and directionality of RSC action on nucleosomes depends upon the arrangement of two specific DNA motifs that promote its binding and nucleosome displacement activity at promoters. Thus, despite their widespread co-localization, RSC and pioneer factors predominantly act independently to generate accessible chromatin. Our results provide insight into how promoter DNA sequence instructs trans-acting factors to control nucleosome architecture and stimulate transcription initiation.

molecular biology↗