Biology subjects

Shokralla, S.

Publications and source records attributed to Shokralla, S..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2019

Metabarcoding a Metacommunity: detecting change in a wetland wilderness

The complexity and natural variability of ecosystems present a challenge for reliable detection of change due to anthropogenic influences. This issue is exacerbated by necessary trade-offs that reduce the quality and resolution of survey data for assessments at large-scales. The Peace-Athabasca Delta (PAD) is a large inland wetland complex in northern Alberta, Canada. Despite its geographic isolation, the PAD is threatened by encroachment of oil sands mining in the Athabasca watershed, and hydroelectric dams in the Peace watershed. Methods capable of reliably detecting changes in ecosystem health are needed to evaluate and manage risks. Between 2011 and 2016, aquatic macroinvertebrates were sampled across a gradient of wetland flood frequency, applying both microscope-based morphological identification, and DNA metabarcoding. Using multi-species occupancy models, we demonstrate that DNA metabarcoding detected a much broader range of taxa and more taxa per sample compared to traditional morphological identification, and was essential to identifying significant responses to flood and thermal regimes. We show that family-level occupancy masks high variation among genera, and for the first time, quantify the bias of barcoding primers on the probability of detection in a natural community. Interestingly, patterns of community assembly were near random, suggesting a strong role of stochasticity in the dynamics of the metacommunity. This variability seriously compromises effective monitoring at local scales, but also reflects resilience to hydrological and thermal variability. Nevertheless, simulations showed the greater efficiency of metabarcoding, particularly at a finer taxonomic resolution, provided the statistical power needed to detect change at the landscape scale.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2019

Watered-down biodiversity? A comparison of metabarcoding results from DNA extracted from matched water and bulk tissue biomonitoring samples

Biomonitoring programs have evolved beyond the sole use of morphological identification to determine the composition of invertebrate species assemblages in an array of ecosystems. The application of DNA metabarcoding in freshwater systems for assessing benthic invertebrate communities is now being employed to generate biological information for environmental monitoring and assessment. A possible shift from the extraction of DNA from net-collected bulk benthic samples to its extraction directly from water samples for metabarcoding has generated considerable interest based on the assumption that taxon detectability is comparable when using either method. To test this, we studied paired water and benthos samples from a taxon-rich wetland complex, to investigate differences in the detection of taxa from each sample type. We demonstrate that metabarcoding of DNA extracted directly from water samples is a poor surrogate for DNA extracted from bulk benthic samples, focusing on key bioindicator groups. Our results continue to support the use of bulk benthic samples as a basis for metabarcoding-based biomonitoring, with nearly three times greater total richness in benthic samples compared to water samples. We also demonstrated that few arthropod taxa are shared between collection methods, with a notable lack of key bioindicator EPTO taxa in the water samples. Although species coverage in water could likely be improved through increased sample replication and/or increased sequencing depth, benthic samples remain the most representative, cost-effective method of generating aquatic compositional information via metabarcoding.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2017

DNA Metabarcoding For High-Throughput Monitoring Of Estuarine Macrobenthic Communities

Benthic communities are key components of aquatic ecosystems biomonitoring. However, morphology-based species identifications remain a low-throughput, and sometimes ambiguous, approach. Despite metabarcoding methodologies have been applied for above-species taxa inventories in marine meiofaunal communities, a comprehensive approach providing species-level identifications for estuarine macrobenthic communities is still lacking. Here we report a combination of experimental and field studies demonstrating the aptitude of COI metabarcoding to provide robust species-level identifications within a framework of high-throughput monitoring of estuarine macrobenthic communities. To investigate the ability to recover DNA barcodes from all species present in a bulk DNA extract, we assembled 3 phylogenetically diverse communities, using 4 different primer pairs to generate PCR products of the COI barcode region. Between 78 and 83% of the species in the tested communities were recovered through HTS. Subsequently, we compared morphology and metabarcoding-based approaches to determine the species composition from four distinct sites of an estuary. Our results indicate that the species richness would be considerably underestimated if only morphological methods were used. Although further refinement is required for improving the efficiency and output of this approach, here we show the great aptitude of COI metabarcoding to provide high quality and auditable species identifications in macrobenthos monitoring.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2016

Environmental DNA Barcode Sequence Capture: Targeted, PCR-free Sequence Capture for Biodiversity Analysis from Bulk Environmental Samples

Environmental DNA analysis using PCR amplified marker genes has been a key application of high-throughput sequencing (HTS). However, PCR bias is a major drawback to gain accurate qualitative and quantitative biodiversity data. We developed a PCR-free approach using enrichment baits for species-specific mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase 1(COI) DNA barcodes. The sequence capture was tested on species-rich bulk terrestrial and aquatic benthic samples. Hybridization capture recovered an average of 6 and 4.7 more arthropod orders than amplicon sequencing for terrestrial and benthic samples, respectively. For the terrestrial sample, the four most abundant arthropod orders comprised 94.0% of the sample biomass. These same four orders comprised 95.5% and 97.5% of the COI sequences recovered by amplification and capture, respectively. Hybridization capture recovered three arthropod orders that were detected by biomass analysis, but not by amplicon sequencing and two other insect orders that were not detected by either biomass or amplicon methods. These results indicate the advantage of using sequence capture for a more accurate analysis of biodiversity in bulk environmental samples. The protocol can be easily customized to other DNA barcode markers or gene regions of interest for a wide range of taxa or for a specific target group.

genomics↗