bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Shoffstall, A.

Publications and source records attributed to Shoffstall, A..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Identification of low threshold off-target activation pathways during stimulation of carotid baroreceptor afferents in swine.

ObjectiveElectrical stimulation of the baroreceptors pathways at the carotid sinus bulb - known as baroreflex activation therapy (BAT) - is intended to change autonomic tone and ultimately reduce blood pressure and heart rate. BAT is pre-market approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of heart failure and received an FDA humanitarian device exemption for drug resistant hypertension. However, responder rates are limited by side-effects including numbness in the head and neck, altered speech, respiratory constriction, dry cough, vomiting, and altered sensory and motor function of the tongue. We hypothesized that these side-effects are driven by activation of other nearby nerve fibers of similar or lower threshold than the carotid sinus nerve. In this study, we sought to identify the neural sources responsible for off-target muscle activation contributing to these side-effects. These sources would inform strategies mitigating off-target activation in BAT therapy. MethodsDomestic swine were used in this work as the diameter and thickness of the swine carotid artery are closer to human than those of canine models. A monopolar disk electrode mimicking the clinical CVRx(R) Neo electrode was surgically placed proximal to the carotid bifurcation with the position optimized for stimulation dose responsive changes in blood pressure. Evoked responses were recorded during dose response testing from multiple neck muscles, and the corresponding off-target nerve pathways were identified by sequential transection of nearby nerves. ResultsThe following activated off-target muscle groups and their corresponding nerve pathways were verified which included 1) the cricoarytenoid via recurrent laryngeal nerve, 2) cricothyroid via superior laryngeal nerve, 3) sternocleidomastoid via accessory nerve, and 4) the tongue via hypoglossal nerve. The constrictor muscle group was also activated through a more complex neural pathway. ConclusionWe identified multiple sources of therapy-limiting side-effects of BAT in the swine model. These results will help guide the design of improved stimulation electrodes, surgical placement, and parameter programming to reduce BAT-associated side-effects while increasing on-target activation in patients.

bioengineering↗

Prevalence of sympathetic fibers within the rat cervical vagus, and functional consequence on physiological effects mediated by vagus nerve stimulation (VNS).

IntroductionElectrical stimulation of the vagus nerve (VNS) is an FDA approved therapy for epilepsy, depression and rehabilitation after stroke, with recent clinical trials to treat heart failure and inflammation. VNS is often assumed to activate either parasympathetic efferents projecting to visceral organs, and/or sensory afferents projecting from these organs, for its therapeutic effects. Recent studies in humans, swine and dogs have shown that sympathetic nerve fibers from the sympathetic trunk (ST) can frequently be found within the cervical vagus nerve (VN). However, the prevalence and functional consequence of sympathetic fibers on VNS have yet to be elucidated in the most common high throughput animal model to study disease, the rodent. MethodsWe carefully traced ST from sympathetic cervical ganglion (SCG) to find its location in the carotid sheath with reference to the VN in a cohort of Long Evans rats. We then assessed the prevalence of ST fibers with the cervical VN across the cohort using microCT and immunohistochemistry. Finally, we stimulated the VN and the ST in isolation, and where they were conjoined, to evaluate the ST contribution to changes in heart rate. VNS induced heart rate changes are a commonly used surrogate for changes in sympathetic/parasympathetic tone. ResultsThe ST frequently runs in very close proximity to the VN in rats when traced caudally from the SCG. The ST is even conjoined with the VN for stretches within the carotid sheathe at the most common location to place an epineural cuff. Cross-connecting branches were found between the ST and the VN. VNS performed at locations where there was minimal ST crossover induced dose-dependent bradycardia (decrease in heart rate) across the cohort, with detectable bradycardia across the cohort beginning at 50 A (n=8 right, n=3 left). Conversely, stimulation of the isolated ST induced tachycardia (increase in heart rate) across the cohort beginning at [~]200 A (n=7 right, n=3 left). ConclusionThese data suggest that studies of VNS in the rodent model may also be stimulating sympathetic fibers from the ST in addition to canonical VN pathways. Concurrent sympathetic activation has profound implications for dissecting mechanisms of VNS for a host of diseases/disorders. As such, careful post-mortem assessment of the presence of hitchhiking sympathetic fibers within the VN is critical for understanding sources of variability in VNS outcomes.

neuroscience↗

Epidural Spinal Cord Recordings (ESRs): Sources of Artifact in Stimulation Evoked Compound Action Potentials

IntroductionEvoked compound action potentials (ECAPs) measured using epidural spinal recordings (ESRs) during epidural spinal cord stimulation (SCS) can help elucidate fundamental mechanisms for the treatment of pain, as well as inform closed-loop control of SCS. Previous studies have used ECAPs to characterize the neural response to various neuromodulation therapies and have demonstrated that ECAPs are highly prone to multiple sources of artifact, including post-stimulus pulse capacitive artifact, electromyography (EMG) bleed-through, and motion artifact resulting from disturbance of the electrode/tissue interface during normal behavior. However, a thorough characterization has yet to be performed for how these sources of artifact may contaminate recordings within the temporal window commonly used to determine activation of A-beta fibers in a large animal model. MethodsWe characterized the sources of artifacts that can contaminate the recording of ECAPs in an epidural SCS swine model using the Abbott Octrode lead. Muscle paralytics were administered to block muscle activation preventing EMG from contaminating the recorded ECAPs. Concurrent EMG recordings of the longissimus, a long muscle of the back, were used to confirm a 2-4 millisecond (ms) latency source of EMG bleed-through that frequently contaminated the A-beta temporal window. Additionally, we obtained recordings approximately 5-10 minutes post-mortem after clear evoked A-beta and associated EMG responses ceased to characterize the representation of stimulation artifact across the array. ResultsSpinal ECAP recordings can be contaminated by capacitive artifact, short latency EMG from nearby long muscles of the back, and motion artifact from multiple sources. In many cases, the capacitive artifact can appear nearly identical in duration and waveshape to evoked A-beta responses. These sources of EMG can have phase shifts across the electrode array, very similar to the phase shift anticipated by propagation of an evoked A-beta fiber response across the array. This short latency EMG is often evident at currents similar to those needed to activate A-beta fibers associated with the treatment of pain. Changes in cerebrospinal fluid between the cord and dura, and motion induced during breathing created a cyclic oscillation in all evoked components of the recorded ECAP signal. ConclusionCareful controls must be implemented to accurately separate neural signal from the sources of artifact in spinal cord ECAPs. To address this, we suggest experimental procedures and associated reporting requirements necessary to disambiguate the underlying neural response from these confounds. These data are important to better understand the conceptual framework for recorded ESRs, with components such as ECAPs, EMG responses and artifacts, and have important implications for closed-loop control algorithms to account for transient motion such as postural changes and cough.

neuroscience↗

Stimulation of the Dorsal Root Ganglion using an Injectrode

ObjectiveThe goal of this work was to compare afferent fiber recruitment by dorsal root ganglion (DRG) stimulation using an injectable polymer electrode (Injectrode(R)) and a more traditional cylindrical metal electrode. ApproachWe exposed the L6 and L7 DRG in four cats via a partial laminectomy or burr hole. We stimulated the DRG using an Injectrode or a stainless steel electrode using biphasic pulses at three different pulse widths (80, 150, 300 s) and pulse amplitudes spanning the range used for clinical DRG stimulation. We recorded antidromic evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs) in the sciatic, tibial, and common peroneal nerves using nerve cuffs. We calculated the conduction velocity of the ECAPs and determined the charge-thresholds and recruitment rates for ECAPs from A, A{beta}, and A{delta} fibers. We also performed electrochemical impedance spectroscopy measurements for both electrode types. Main ResultsThe ECAP thresholds for the Injectrode did not differ from the stainless steel electrode across all primary afferents (A, A{beta}, A{delta}) and pulse widths; charge-thresholds increased with wider pulse widths. Thresholds for generating ECAPs from A{beta} fibers were 100.0 {+/-} 32.3 nC using the stainless steel electrode, and 90.9 {+/-} 42.9 nC using the Injectrode. The ECAP thresholds from the Injectrode were consistent over several hours of stimulation. The rate of recruitment was similar between the Injectrodes and stainless steel electrode and decreased with wider pulse widths. SignificanceThe Injectrode can effectively excite primary afferents when used for DRG stimulation within the range of parameters used for clinical DRG stimulation. The Injectrode can be implanted through minimally invasive techniques while achieving similar neural activation to conventional electrodes, making it an excellent candidate for future DRG stimulation and neuroprosthetic applications.

bioengineering↗