bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Shmarov, M. M.

Publications and source records attributed to Shmarov, M. M..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Circular mRNA against Clean Cap linear mRNA vectors comprehensive comparison, expression, active and passive immunization

The mRNA platform has revolutionised vaccine technology by providing a universal, fast and easily scalable production process. There are two main types of mRNA - linear (cap-dependent) and circular (cap-independent), each with its own advantages. Although both vector types are continuously being improved, there has been no comprehensive comparative analysis of the most efficient existing vectors of each type. This paper provides a comparison of expression efficiency, protective and therapeutic activities of circular and linear mRNA vectors. We examined different combinations of linear vectors: containing either N1-methylpseudouridines or uridine and capped with either ARCA (m7G(5')ppp(5')G) or CleanCap (m7G(5')ppp(5')m2G). Circular vectors contained both commonly used IRES of coxsackievirus B3 and new a IRES of human rhinoviruses B6. Preliminary luciferase assay showed that modified linear vectors exhibited significantly higher expression levels both in vitro and in vivo. A similar but less dramatic difference was observed in expression of the target protein. At the same time, immunogenicity and protective activity of linear and circular vectors were equal.

immunology↗

Trivalent mRNA vaccine-candidate against seasonal flu with cross-specific humoral immune response

ABSTRACTSeasonal influenza remains a serious global health problem, leading to high mortality rates among the elderly and individuals with comorbidities. It also imposes a substantial economic burden through increased absenteeism during periods of active pathogen circulation. Vaccination is generally accepted as the most effective strategy for influenza prevention. As both influenza A and B viruses circulate and cause seasonal epidemics, vaccines need to include multiple antigens derived from different viral subtypes. While current influenza vaccines are effective, they still have limitations, including narrow specificity for certain serological variants, which may result in a mismatch between vaccine antigens and circulating strains. Additionally, the rapid variability of the virus poses challenges in providing extended protection beyond a single season. Therefore, mRNA technology is particularly promising for influenza prevention, as it enables the rapid development of multivalent vaccines and allows for quick updates of their antigenic composition. mRNA vaccines have already proven successful in preventing COVID-19 by eliciting rapid cellular and humoral immune responses. In this study, we present the development of a trivalent mRNA vaccine candidates, evaluate its immunogenicity using the hemagglutination inhibition assay, and assess its efficacy in animals. We demonstrate the higher immunogenicity of the mRNA vaccine candidates compared to the inactivated split influenza vaccine and its enhanced ability to generate a cross-specific humoral immune response. These findings highlight the potential mRNA technology in overcoming current limitations of influenza vaccines and hold promise for ensuring greater efficacy in preventing seasonal influenza outbreaks.

immunology↗