bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Shinohara, A.

Publications and source records attributed to Shinohara, A..

15 recordsLinked to original sources

Multi-layered control of chromosomal assembly of the meiotic DNA break machinery

Meiotic DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) form in chromatin loops that are tethered to chromosome axes. How proteins required for DSB formation in vivo (DSB proteins) assemble on meiotic chromosomes to control non-random DSB distribution remains unsolved. Here we mapped the spatial distributions of all ten DSB proteins that form three complexes (Spo11-Ski8-Rec102-Rec104 [Spo11-core], Rec114-Mei4-Mer2 [RMM], and Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 [MRX]) in budding yeast and elucidated their functional dependencies with axial proteins Red1 and Hop1. At local levels, our analysis suggests that their axis-associated assembly involves two distinct pathways, Hop1-RMM-MRX and Red1-Spo11 core, whereas Spo11-core alone can bind DSB sites. Red1 also binds DSB sites in a DSB-dependent manner, supporting its critical role in DSB repair. At large scale, all ten DSB proteins and both axial proteins are enriched at DSB-hot domains 20-40 kb wide that correspond to sizes of the axis-loop units. Further analysis at short and long distances suggests that their local assembly, short-range/intra-loop distributions, and long-range/inter-loop distributions are distinctly controlled. Similarly in mouse spermatocytes, MEl4 and a Hop1 homolog HORMAD1 are enriched at DSB-hot domains 1-3 Mb wide, and their long-range distributions are distinctly controlled from their local assembly. Our results elucidate multi-layered mechanisms of chromosomal assembly of the DSB machinery in shaping the DSB landscape in yeast and mouse.

Molecular Biology↗

Age-dependent accumulation of RAD51 on non-damaged chromosomes prevents chromosome segregation in mammalian oocytes

RAD51 is targeted to single-stranded (ss)DNA for homologous recombination and DNA replication fork homeostasis. However, the physiological consequences of RAD51 binding to intact double-stranded (ds)DNA, which is tightly limited in vivo, remain elusive. Here we revealed an intrinsic property of RAD51 to bind chromosome axes where cohesin and condensin bind, which is actively suppressed by FIGNL1 AAA+ ATPase. In Fignl1-deficient mouse oocytes, an age-dependent RAD51 accumulation with little DNA damage leads to improper chromosomal localization of condensin II and topoisomerase II, failure in chromosome condensation with massive chromosome entanglement, and meiosis I arrest. We propose that promiscuous RAD51 binding to non-damaged chromosomes, which is prevented by a RAD51 remodeler, is a unique type of chromosomal pathology associated with genome instability.

cell biology↗

Post-translational cleavage of Mei5 of Dmc1 mediator, Mei5-Sae3 complex, in yeast meiosis

Interhomolog recombination in meiosis is mediated by the Dmc1 recombinase. The Mei5-Sae3 complex of S. cerevisiae promotes Dmc1 assembly and functions with Dmc1 for homology-mediated repair of meiotic DNA double-strand breaks. How Mei5-Sae3 facilitates Dmc1 assembly remains poorly understood. In this study, we created and characterized several mei5 mutants featuring the amino acid substitutions of basic residues. We found that Arg97 of Mei5, conserved in its ortholog, SFR1(complex with SWI5), RAD51 mediator, in humans and other organisms, is critical for complex formation with Sae3 for Dmc1 assembly. Moreover, the substitution of Arg117 with Ala in Mei5 resulted in the production of a C-terminal truncated Mei5 protein during yeast meiosis. Notably, the shorter Mei5-R117A protein was observed in meiotic cells but not in mitotic cells when expressed, suggesting a unique regulation of Dmc1-mediated recombination by post-translational processing of Mei5-Sae3.

molecular biology↗

Replication protein-A, RPA, plays a pivotal role in the maintenance of recombination checkpoint in yeast meiosis

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) activate DNA damage responses (DDR) in both mitotic and meiotic cells. A single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) binding protein, Replication protein-A (RPA) binds to the ssDNA formed at DSBs to activate ATR/Mec1 kinase for the response. Meiotic DSBs induce homologous recombination monitored by a meiotic DDR called the recombination checkpoint that blocks the pachytene exit in meiotic prophase I. In this study, we showed the essential role of RPA in the maintenance of the recombination checkpoint during S. cerevisiae meiosis. The depletion of an RPA subunit, Rfa1, in a recombination-defective dmc1 mutant, fully alleviates the pachytene arrest with the persistent unrepaired DSBs. RPA depletion decreases the activity of a meiosis-specific CHK2 homolog, Mek1 kinase, which in turn activates the Ndt80 transcriptional regulator for pachytene exit. These support the idea that RPA is a sensor of ssDNAs for the activation of meiotic DDR. Rfa1 depletion also accelerates the prophase I delay in the zip1 mutant defective in both chromosome synapsis and the recombination, suggesting that the accumulation of ssDNAs rather than defective synapsis triggers prophase I delay in the zip1 mutant.

genetics↗

FIGNL1 AAA+ ATPase remodels RAD51 and DMC1 filaments in meiotic DNA replication and recombination

The formation of RAD51/DMC1 filaments on single-stranded (ss)DNAs essential for homology search and strand exchange in DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair is tightly regulated. FIGNL1 AAA+++ ATPase controls RAD51-mediated recombination in human cells. However, its role in gametogenesis remains unsolved. Here, we characterized a germ-line-specific conditional knockout (cKO) mouse of FIGNL1. Fignl1 cKO male mice showed defective chromosome synapsis and impaired meiotic DSB repair with the accumulation of RAD51/DMC1 on meiotic chromosomes, supporting a positive role of FIGNL1 in homologous recombination at a post-assembly stage of RAD51/DMC1 filaments. Fignl1 cKO spermatocytes also accumulate RAD51/DMC1 on chromosomes in pre-meiotic S-phase. These RAD51/DMC1 assemblies are independent of meiotic DSB formation. We also showed that purified FIGNL1 dismantles RAD51 filament on double-stranded (ds)DNA as well as ssDNA. These results suggest an additional role of FIGNL1 in limiting the non-productive assembly of RAD51/DMC1 on native dsDNAs during pre-meiotic S-phase and meiotic prophase I.

molecular biology↗

Exo1-protected DNA nicks direct crossover formation in meiosis

In most sexually reproducing organisms crossing over between chromosome homologs during meiosis is critical for the viability of haploid gametes. Most crossovers that form in meiosis in budding yeast result from the biased resolution of double Holliday Junction (dHJ) intermediates. This dHJ resolution step involves the actions Rad2/XPG family nuclease Exo1 and the Mlh1-Mlh3 mismatch repair endonuclease. At present little is known about how these factors act in meiosis at the molecular level. Here we show that Exo1 promotes meiotic crossing over by protecting DNA nicks from ligation. We found that structural elements in Exo1 required for interactions with DNA, such as bending of DNA during nick/flap recognition, are critical for its role in crossing over. Consistent with these observations, meiotic expression of the Rad2/XPG family member Rad27 partially rescued the crossover defect in exo1 null mutants, and meiotic overexpression of Cdc9 ligase specifically reduced the crossover levels of exo1 DNA binding mutants to levels approaching the exo1 null. In addition, our work identified a role for Exo1 in crossover interference that appears independent of its resection activity. Together, these studies provide experimental evidence for Exo1-protected nicks being critical for the formation of meiotic crossovers and their distribution.

molecular biology↗

Myoglobin primary structure reveals multiple convergent transitions to semi-aquatic life in the world smallest mammalian divers

Identifying the phylogenomic underpinnings of specialized phenotypes that fueled transitions into new adaptive zones is central to evolutionary biology but is often confounded by a fragmentary fossil record, morphological convergence, and unresolved phylogenetic relationships. The speciose mammalian order Eulipotyphla (e.g., moles, shrews, hedgehogs, solenodons) combines an unusual diversity of semi-aquatic, semi-fossorial, and fossorial forms that arose from terrestrial forbearers, yet the ecomorphological pathways leading to these lifestyles have been disputed for a century and more, calling for novel approaches. Here we resolve previously intractable eulipotyphlan intra-family relationships and establish the net surface charge of the oxygen-storing muscle protein myoglobin-readily determined from its primary structure-as a molecular signature to trace ancient lifestyle transitions based on protein sequence alone. Our analyses confidently resolve fossorial habits having evolved twice in talpid moles and reveal five independent origins of a semi-aquatic lifestyle in the order housing the worlds smallest endothermic divers.

evolutionary biology↗

Phosphorylation of luminal region of the SUN-domain protein Mps3 promotes nuclear envelope localization during meiosis

During meiosis, protein ensembles in the nuclear envelope (NE) containing SUN- and KASH-domain proteins, called linker nucleocytoskeleton and cytoskeleton (LINC) complex, promote the chromosome motion. Yeast SUN-domain protein, Mps3, forms multiple meiosis-specific ensembles on NE, which show dynamic localisation for chromosome motion; however, the mechanism by which these Mps3 ensembles are formed during meiosis remains largely unknown. Here, we showed that the cyclin-dependent protein kinase (CDK) and Dbf4-dependent Cdc7 protein kinase (DDK) regulate meiosis-specific dynamics of Mps3 on NE, particularly by mediating the resolution of Mps3 clusters and telomere clustering. We also found that the luminal region of Mps3 juxtaposed to the inner nuclear membrane is required for meiosis-specific localisation of Mps3 on NE. Negative charges introduced by meiosis-specific phosphorylation in the luminal region of Mps3 alter its interaction with negatively charged lipids by electric repulsion in reconstituted liposomes. Phospho-mimetic substitution in the luminal region suppresses the localisation of Mps3 via the inactivation of CDK or DDK. Our study revealed multi-layered phosphorylation-dependent regulation of the localisation of Mps3 on NE for meiotic chromosome motion and NE remodelling.

molecular biology↗

SCFCdc4 ubiquitin ligase regulates synaptonemal complex formation during meiosis

Homologous chromosomes pair with each other during meiosis, culminating in the formation of the synaptonemal complex (SC), which is coupled with meiotic recombination. In this study, we showed that a meiosis-specific depletion mutant of a cullin (Cdc53) of the SCF (Skp-Cullin-F-box) ubiquitin ligase, which plays a critical role in cell cycle regulation during mitosis, is deficient in SC formation, but is proficient in the formation of crossovers, indicating uncoupling of meiotic recombination with SC formation in the mutant. Furthermore, the deletion of the PCH2 gene encoding a meiosis-specific AAA+ ATPase suppresses SC-assembly defect induced by CDC53 depletion. On the other hand, the pch2 cdc53 double mutant is defective in meiotic crossover formation, suggesting the SC assembly with unrepaired DSBs. A temperature-sensitive mutant of the CDC4, which encodes a F-box protein of the SCF, shows similar meiotic defects to the CDC53 depletion mutant. These suggest that SCFCdc4, probably SCFCdc4-dependnet protein ubiquitylation, regulates and collaborates with Pch2 in SC assembly and meiotic recombination. SummaryDuring meiosis, homologous chromosomes pair with each other and form the synaptonemal complex (SC). In this study, components of the SCF (Skp-Cullin-F-box) ubiquitin ligase, Cdc53 and Cdc4, are required for SC formation. A meiosis-specific AAA+ ATPase Pch2 antagonize the functions of Cdc53 and Cdc4 for proper SC assembly.

molecular biology↗

The bakerss yeast Msh4-Msh5 associates with double-strand break hotspots and chromosome axis during meiosis to promote crossovers

Segregation of homologous chromosomes during the first meiotic division requires at least one obligate crossover/exchange event between the homolog pairs. In the bakers yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and mammals, the mismatch repair-related factors, Msh4-Msh5 and Mlh1-Mlh3 generate the majority of the meiotic crossovers from programmed double-strand breaks (DSBs). To understand the mechanistic role of Msh4-Msh5 in meiotic crossing over, we performed genome-wide ChIP-sequencing and cytological analysis of the Msh5 protein in cells synchronized for meiosis. We observe that Msh5 associates with DSB hotspots, chromosome axis, and centromeres. We found that the initial recruitment of Msh4-Msh5 occurs following DSB resection. A two-step Msh5 binding pattern was observed: an early weak binding at DSB hotspots followed by enhanced late binding upon the formation of double Holliday junction structures. Msh5 association with the chromosome axis is Red1 dependent, while Msh5 association with the DSB hotspots and axis is dependent on DSB formation by Spo11. Msh5 binding was enhanced at strong DSB hotspots consistent with a role for DSB frequency in promoting Msh5 binding. These data on the in vivo localization of Msh5 during meiosis have implications for how Msh4-Msh5 may work with other crossover and synapsis promoting factors to ensure Holliday junction resolution at the chromosome axis. AUTHOR SUMMARYDuring meiosis, crossovers facilitate physical linkages between homologous chromosomes that ensure their accurate segregation. Meiotic crossovers are initiated from programmed DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). In the bakers yeast and mammals, DSBs are repaired into crossovers primarily through a pathway involving the highly conserved mismatch repair related Msh4-Msh5 complex along with other crossover promoting factors. In vitro and physical studies suggest that the Msh4-Msh5 heterodimer facilitates meiotic crossover formation by stabilizing Holliday junctions. We investigated the genome-wide in vivo binding sites of Msh5 during meiotic progression. Msh5 was enriched at DSB hotspots, chromosome axis, and centromere sites. Our results suggest Msh5 associates with both DSB sites on the chromosomal loops and with the chromosome axis to promote crossover formation. These results on the in vivo dynamic localization of the Msh5 protein provide novel insights into how the Msh4-Msh5 complex may work with other crossover and synapsis promoting factors to facilitate crossover formation.

genetics↗

Nuclear actin cable with multiple branches during yeast meiosis

Actin polymerizes to form filaments/cables for motility, transport, and structural framework in a cell. Recent studies show that actin polymers are present not only in cytoplasm, but also in nuclei of vertebrate cells, and their formation is induced in response to stress. Here, by electron microscopic observation with rapid freezing and high-pressure freezing, we found a unique bundled structure containing actin in nuclei of budding yeast cells undergoing meiosis. The nuclear bundle/cable during meiosis consists of multiple filaments with a rectangular lattice arrangement often showing "feather-like" appearance. The bundle is immuno-labeled with anti-actin antibody and sensitive to an actin-depolymerizing drug. Like cytoplasmic bundles, nuclear bundles with actin are rarely seen in pre-meiotic cells and spores, and are induced during meiotic prophase-I. The formation of the nuclear bundles/cables is independent of meiotic DNA double-stranded breaks. We speculate that nuclear bundles/cables containing actin play a role in nuclear events during meiotic prophase I.

cell biology↗

DNA damage response clamp loader Rad24(Rad17) and Mec1(ATR) kinase have distinct functions in regulating meiotic crossovers

Crossover (CO) recombination is essential for chromosome segregation during meiosis I. The number and distribution of COs are tightly regulated during meiosis. CO control includes CO assurance and CO interference, which guarantee at least one CO per a bivalent and evenly-spaced CO distribution, respectively. Previous studies showed the role of DNA damage response (DDR) clamp and its loader in efficient formation of meiotic COs by promoting the recruitment of a pro-CO protein Zip3 and interhomolog recombination, and also by suppressing ectopic recombination. In this study, by classical tetrad analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, we showed that a mutant defective in the RAD24 gene (RAD17 in other organisms), which encodes the DDR clamp loader, displayed reduced CO frequencies on two shorter chromosomes (III and V) but not on a long chromosome (chromosome VII). The residual COs in the rad24 mutant do not show interference. In contrast to the rad24 mutant, mutants defective in the ATR kinase homolog Mec1/Esr1, including a mec1 null and a mec1 kinase-dead mutant, show little or no defect in CO frequency. On the other hand, mec1 COs show defects in interference, similar to the rad24 mutant. Moreover, CO formation and its control are implemented in a chromosome-specific manner, which may reflect a role for chromosome size in regulation.

genetics↗

Srs2 helicase prevents the formation of toxic DNA damage during late prophase I of yeast meiosis

Proper repair of double-strand breaks (DSBs) is key to ensure proper chromosome segregation. In this study, we found that the deletion of the SRS2 gene, which encodes a DNA helicase necessary for the control of homologous recombination, induces aberrant chromosome segregation during budding yeast meiosis. This abnormal chromosome segregation in srs2 cells accompanies the formation of a novel DNA damage induced during late meiotic prophase-I. The damage may contain long stretches of single-stranded DNAs (ssDNAs), which lead to aggregate formation of a ssDNA binding protein, RPA, and a RecA homolog, Rad51, as well as other recombination proteins inside of the nuclei. The Rad51 aggregate formation in the srs2 mutant depends on the initiation of meiotic recombination and occurs in the absence of chromosome segregation. Importantly, as an early recombination intermediate, we detected a thin bridge of Rad51 between two Rad51 foci or among the foci in the srs2 mutant, which is rarely seen in wild type. These might be cytological manifestation of the connection of two DSB ends and multi-invasion. The DNA damage with Rad51 aggregates in the srs2 mutant is passed through anaphase-I and -II, suggesting the absence of DNA damage-induced cell-cycle arrest after the pachytene stage. We propose that Srs2 helicase resolves early protein-DNA recombination intermediates to suppress the formation of aberrant lethal DNA damage during late prophase-I.

genetics↗

Human RAD51 paralogue, SWSAP1, fosters RAD51 filament by regulating the anti-recombinase, FIGNL1 AAA+ ATPase

RAD51 assembly on single-stranded (ss)DNAs is a crucial step in the homology-dependent repair of DNA damage for genomic stability. The formation of the RAD51 filament is tightly regulated by various RAD51-interacting proteins. The familial breast cancer gene, BRCA2, as well as RAD52 and six RAD51 paralogues (SWSAP1, RAD51B, RAD51C, RAD51D, XRCC2, and XRCC3) promote RAD51 assembly on ssDNAs in humans. However, the mechanisms underlying the differential control of RAD51 filament dynamics by these factors remain largely unknown. Here, we report a role for the human RAD51 paralogue, SWSAP1, as a novel regulator of RAD51 assembly. Swsap1-deficient cells show defects in DNA damage-induced RAD51 assembly during both mitosis and meiosis. Defective RAD51 assembly in SWSAP1-depleted cells is suppressed by the depletion of FIGNL1, an AAA+ ATPase, which binds to RAD51 as well as SWSAP1. Purified FIGNL1 promotes the dissociation of RAD51 from ssDNAs. The in vitro dismantling activity of FIGNL1 does not require its ATPase but depends on RAD51-binding, suggesting a novel mechanism of RAD51 filament remodelling. Purified SWSAP1 inhibits the RAD51-dismantling activity of FIGNL1. Taken together, our data suggest that SWSAP1 protects RAD51 filaments by antagonizing the anti-recombinase, FIGNL1.

molecular biology↗

Unexpected erosion of chromosome cohesion by a mitotic prophase-like pathway in yeast meiosis

Sister chromatid cohesion on chromosome arms is essential for the segregation of homologous chromosomes during meiosis I while it is dispensable for sister chromatid separation during mitosis. It was assumed that, unlike the situation in mitosis, chromosome arms retain cohesion prior to onset of anaphase-I. Paradoxically, reduced immunostaining signals of meiosis-specific cohesin, including the kleisin Rec8, from the chromosomes were observed during late prophase-I of budding yeast. This decrease is seen in the absence of Rec8 cleavage and depends on condensin-mediated recruitment of Polo-like kinase (PLK/Cdc5). In this study, we confirmed that this release indeed accompanies the dissociation of acetylated Smc3 as well as Rec8 from meiotic chromosomes during late prophase-I. This release requires, in addition to PLK, the cohesin regulator, Wapl (Rad61/Wpl1 in yeast), and Dbf4-dependent Cdc7 kinase (DDK). Meiosis-specific phosphorylation of Rad61/Wpl1 and Rec8 by PLK and DDK collaboratively promote this release. This process is similar to the vertebrate \"prophase\" pathway for cohesin release during G2 phase and pro-metaphase. In yeast, meiotic cohesin release coincides with PLK-dependent compaction of chromosomes in late meiotic prophase-I. We suggest that yeast uses this highly regulated cleavage-independent pathway to remove cohesin during late prophase-I to facilitate morphogenesis of condensed metaphase-I chromosomes.\n\nAuthor SummaryIn meiosis the life and health of future generations is decided upon. Any failure in chromosome segregation has a detrimental impact. Therefore, it is currently believed that the physical connections between homologous chromosomes are maintained by meiotic cohesin with exceptional stability. Indeed, it was shown that cohesive cohesin does not show an appreciable turnover during long periods in oocyte development. In this context, it was long assumed but not properly investigated, that the prophase pathway for cohesin release would be specific to mitotic cells and will be safely suppressed during meiosis so as not to endanger the valuable chromosome connections. However, a previous study on budding yeast meiosis suggests the presence of cleavage-independent pathway of cohesin release during late prophase-I. In the work presented here we confirmed that the prophase pathway is not suppressed during meiosis, at least in budding yeast and showed that this cleavage-independent release is regulated by meiosis-specific phosphorylation of two cohesin subunits, Rec8 and Rad61(Wapl) by two cell-cycle regulators, PLK and DDK. Our results suggest that late meiotic prophase-I actively controls cohesin dynamics on meiotic chromosomes for chromosome segregation.

cell biology↗