A Benchmark of Semi-Supervised scRNA-seq Integration Methods in Real-World Scenarios
Semi-supervised methods for single-cell RNA-seq integration promise to improve batch correction and biological signal preservation by leveraging cell-type labels. However, their reported benefits often rely on overly idealized settings. Here, we present the first systematic benchmark of five leading semi-supervised methods (scANVI, scGEN, ssSTACAS, scDREAMER, ItClust) against five widely used unsupervised baselines across six diverse datasets. We evaluate performance under five realistic annotation scenarios, including missing, erroneous, boundary-missing and mixed, batch-specific, and auto-generated labels, using nine established integration metrics. While semi-supervised methods show gains with perfect annotations, their robustness declines sharply under practical imperfections. Only scANVI and ssSTACAS maintain stable but modest improvements relative to their unsupervised counterparts, while none consistently outperform the strongest unsupervised method, scCRAFT. Our results highlight that current semi-supervised strategies offer limited practical advantage and that careful choice of integration method remains critical when label quality is uncertain.