bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Seynaeve, M.

Publications and source records attributed to Seynaeve, M..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Detecting Sleep Deprivation from Running Biomechanics Using Machine Learning Classification: A Comparison Between Wearable and Laboratory Motion Capture

Sleep deprivation is associated with impaired endurance performance and an increased risk of running-related injury. Previous research has identified alterations in running biomechanics following a single night of sleep deprivation under laboratory conditions. However, whether these biomechanical changes can be detected using wearable technology remains unknown. Twenty-one recreationally active runners completed submaximal treadmill running under both normal sleep and total sleep deprivation conditions in a randomized crossover design. Biomechanical features were extracted simultaneously using a full-body motion capture system and a trunk-mounted wearable sensor. Five machine learning classifiers were evaluated in two classification tasks: a within-subject task using paired recordings from the same individual, and a between-subject task performed without individual baseline data. Within-subject classification consistently exceeded chance level for both measurement systems, with best accuracies of 85% for the wearable sensor (Logistic Regression) and 83% for the motion capture system (Random Forest). These findings indicate that sleep deprivation produces a systematic and individually consistent biomechanical signature during running. In contrast, between-subject classification failed across nearly all models and systems, with accuracies remaining close to chance level ([~]50%), demonstrating that inter-individual variability obscures the sleep-deprivation signal in the absence of personalized baseline data. Both systems converged on temporal organization, loading-related variables, and stride-to-stride variability as the most discriminative feature domains. Contrary to expectations, the laboratory motion capture system did not outperform the wearable sensor. Together, these findings demonstrate that individualized, baseline-referenced monitoring is essential for detecting sleep-deprivation-related changes in running gait, and suggest that a single trunk-mounted wearable sensor may provide a practical solution for real-world monitoring when paired recordings are available.

bioengineering↗

Cortical Activity During Sustained Isometric Ankle Contractions Following Chronic Sleep Restriction: A High-Density EEG Study

BackgroundChronic sleep restriction (CSR) impairs cognitive function, but its effects on the cortical dynamics underlying active motor performance remain poorly understood. High-density EEG provides a means to examine task-related oscillatory activity across sensorimotor and attentional networks during movement. MethodsFifteen healthy males completed a randomized crossover study involving a CSR condition (five hours sleep per night for four nights) and a control condition (normal sleep). Before and after each intervention, participants performed sustained isometric ankle contractions at 40% of their maximal force while EEG was recorded. Source-reconstructed event-related desynchronization (ERD) was computed across theta, alpha, beta, and gamma bands in the sensorimotor network and dorsal attention network. Sustained attention was assessed with the Psychomotor Vigilance Task (PVT) and perceived workload with the NASA Task Load Index. ResultsCSR successfully reduced sleep duration by 2.36 hours on average (p < .001). Following CSR, PVT reaction times increased significantly ({Delta} = +31 ms, p = .002) and attentional lapses increased ({Delta} = +9.87, p < .001). CSR produced a significant overall increase in ERD across bands, networks, and movement directions (F(1, 5713) = 14.20, p < .001). This effect was present in both the sensorimotor and dorsal attention networks. The ERD increase was specific to dorsiflexion and absent during plantarflexion (condition x session x movement direction: F(1, 5713) = 9.13, p = .003). Subjective mental demand increased following CSR (p = .027), while objective motor performance was largely unimpaired. ConclusionCSR increased broadband ERD during dorsiflexion across both sensorimotor and attentional networks, alongside impaired sustained attention and greater perceived mental demand. As motor performance was largely preserved, this increased ERD may reflect compensatory neural recruitment under sleep pressure.

neuroscience↗

Effects of one night of sleep deprivation on single- and dual-task gait

Sleep deprivation impairs cognitive control, which may affect movements that rely on these processes, such as walking. To test whether gait changes after one night of sleep deprivation reflect reduced cognitive capacity, we compared its effects with those of dual-task walking (i.e., walking while performing a simultaneous cognitive task). We hypothesize that sleep deprivation will produce gait changes similar to those under dual-task conditions. Eighteen healthy adults (9 female, 9 male; 22.2 (2.3) yrs) were tested the morning after a sleep deprivation (SDEP) and a control night. Participants completed two 2-min trials: single-task walking and walking with a concurrent 2-back working memory task (DT, dual-task). Using lateral foot and pelvis marker trajectories, we calculated spatiotemporal parameters, foot placement error in antero-posterior (FPEAP) and mediolateral (FPEML) directions, and mediolateral margin of stability (MoSML). SDEP increased average step time (p<0.001) and step length (p=0.001), and DT reduced spatiotemporal variability. Both SDEP (p=0.001) and DT (p<0.001) reduced FPEAP, but only DT reduced FPEML (p<0.001). Additionally, mean MoSML decreased only in SDEP (p=0.011). Overall, these findings suggest that while sleep deprivation and dual-tasking both affect gait, the effects of sleep deprivation on gait cannot be fully explained by reduced cognitive resources.

neuroscience↗

Electrophysiological approaches to understanding brain-muscle interactions during gait: a systematic review

ObjectiveThis study systematically reviews the role of the cortex in gait control by analyzing connectivity between electroencephalography (EEG) and electromyography (EMG) signals, i.e. neuromuscular connectivity (NMC) during walking. We aim to answer the following questions: (i) Is there significant NMC during gait in a healthy population? (ii) Is NMC modulated by gait task specifications (e.g. speed, surface, additional task demands)? (iii) Is NMC altered in the elderly or a population affected by a neuromuscular or neurologic disorder? MethodsFollowing PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search of seven scientific databases was conducted until September 2023. ResultsOut of 1308 identified papers, 27 studies met the eligibility criteria. Despite large variability in methodology, significant NMC was detected in most of the studies. NMC was able to discriminate between a healthy population and a population affected by a neuromuscular or neurologic disorder. Tasks requiring higher sensorimotor control resulted in an elevated level of NMC. ConclusionsWhile NMC holds promise as a metric for advancing our comprehension of brain-muscle interactions during gait, aligning methodologies across studies is imperative. SignificanceAnalysis of NMC provides valuable insights for the understanding of neural control of movement, development of gait retraining programs and contributes to advancements in neurotechnology.

neuroscience↗