Sengar, A. | bioRxiv Science

bioRxiv2021

Single-virus fusion measurements yield an opportunistic model for SARS-CoV-2 fusion

SARS-CoV-2 binds to cell-surface receptors and is activated for membrane fusion and cell entry via proteolytic cleavage. Phenomenological data have shown that SARS-CoV-2 can be activated for entry at either the cell surface or in endosomes, but the relative roles in different cell types and mechanisms of entry have been debated. Here we use single-virus fusion experiments and exogenously controlled proteases to probe activation directly. We find that plasma membrane and an appropriate protease are sufficient to support SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus fusion. Furthermore, fusion kinetics of SARS-CoV-2 pseudoviruses are indistinguishable no matter which of a broad range of proteases was used to activate the virus. This suggests that fusion mechanism is insensitive to protease identity or even whether activation occurs before or after receptor binding. These data support a model for opportunistic fusion by SARS-CoV-2, where subcellular location of entry likely depends on the differential activity of airway, cell-surface, and endosomal proteases, but all support infection. Inhibiting any single host protease may thus reduce infection in some cells but may be less clinically robust. ImportanceSARS-CoV-2 can use multiple pathways to infect cells, as demonstrated recently when new viral variants switched dominant infection pathways. Here, we use single-virus fusion experiments together with biochemical reconstitution to show that these multiple pathways coexist simultaneously and specifically that the virus can be activated by different proteases in different cellular compartments with mechanistically identical effect. The consequences of this are that the virus is evolutionarily plastic and that therapies targeting viral entry should address multiple pathways at once to achieve optimal clinical effects.

microbiology↗

bioRxiv2020

Alternative splicing of GluN1 gates glycine-primed internalization of NMDA receptors

N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDARs), a principal subtype of excitatory neurotransmitter receptor, are composed as tetrameric assemblies of two glycine-binding GluN1 subunits and two glutamate-binding GluN2 subunits. Gating of the NMDARs requires binding of four co-agonist molecules, but the receptors can signal non-ionotropically through binding of glycine, alone, to its cognate site on GluN1. A consequence of this signalling by glycine is that NMDARs are primed such that subsequent gating, produced by glycine and glutamate, drives receptor internalization. The GluN1 subunit is not a singular molecular species in the CNS, rather there are 8 alternatively spliced isoforms of this subunit produced by including or excluding the N1 and the C1, C2 or C2 polypeptide cassettes. Whether alternative splicing affects glycine priming signalling is unknown. Here, using recombinant NMDARs expressed heterologously we discovered that glycine priming of NMDARs critically depends on alternative splicing: the four splice isoforms lacking the N1 cassette, encoded in exon 5, are primed by glycine whereas glycine priming is blocked in the four splice variants containing the N1 cassette. On the other hand, the C-terminal cassettes - C1, C2 or C2 - had no effect on glycine priming signalling. Nor was glycine priming affected by the GluN2 subunit in the receptor. In wild-type mice we found that glycine primed internalization of synaptic NMDARs in CA1 hippocampal pyramidal neurons. With mice we engineered such that GluN1 obligatorily contained the N1 cassette, glycine did not prime synaptic NMDARs in pyramidal neurons. In contrast to pyramidal neurons, we discovered that in wild-type mice, synaptic NMDARs in CA1 inhibitory interneurons were resistant to glycine priming. But we recapitulated glycine priming in inhibitory interneurons in mice engineered such that GluN1 obligatorily lacked the N1 cassette. Our findings reveal a previously unsuspected molecular function for alternative splicing of GluN1 in controlling non-ionotropic signalling of NMDAR by glycine and the consequential cell surface dynamics of the receptors.

neuroscience↗