bioRxiv ScienceSearch

Biology subjects

Sen, K.

Publications and source records attributed to Sen, K..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Muscarinic receptors regulate auditory and prefrontal cortical communication during auditory processing

Much of our understanding about how acetylcholine modulates prefrontal cortical (PFC) networks comes from behavioral experiments that examine cortical dynamics during highly attentive states. However, much less is known about how PFC is recruited during passive sensory processing and how acetylcholine may regulate connectivity between cortical areas outside of task performance. To investigate the involvement of PFC and cholinergic neuromodulation in passive auditory processing, we performed simultaneous recordings in the auditory cortex (AC) and PFC in awake head fixed mice presented with a white noise auditory stimulus in the presence or absence of local cholinergic antagonists in AC. We found that a subset of PFC neurons were strongly driven by auditory stimuli even when the stimulus had no associative meaning, suggesting PFC monitors stimuli under passive conditions. We also found that cholinergic signaling in AC shapes the strength of auditory driven response in PFC, by modulating the intra-cortical sensory response through muscarinic interactions in AC. Taken together, these findings provide novel evidence that cholinergic mechanisms have a continuous role in cortical gating through muscarinic receptors during passive processing and expand traditional views of prefrontal cortical function and the contributions of cholinergic modulation in sensory gating.\n\nHighlightsO_LIPrefrontal cortex actively monitors non-associative stimuli under passive conditions\nC_LIO_LIAcetylcholine facilitates cortical signaling even outside of attentional contexts\nC_LIO_LILocal scopolamine infusion reduced intracortical signaling and impaired cortical gating\nC_LIO_LImAChR have an ongoing role in sound processing\nC_LI

neuroscience

Cooling Induced by Uphill Energy Transport in Plant Photosystems

The uphill energy transfer in photosystems implies input energy at higher wavelength leading to energy output at lower wavelength. Briefly, energy is uphill transported from photosystem I (PSI) to photosystem II (PSII), the latter having a lower wavelength emission. This uphill energy transport involves absorption of thermal energy from the surroundings. While such cooling effects have been reported in laser systems we report for the first time a white light driven cooling in thylakoid suspension. The cooling of the surrounding medium by appropriate illumination was illustrated using thermal measurements. Again cooling is inhibited by agents like 3-(3,4-Dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea,that block the linear electron flow between the photocenters, implying a dependence of the cooling on interplay between such centers. Furthermore, it is possible to modulate the cooling pattern by addition of external agents like nanopaticles, some favoring further cooling (e.g., Ag nanoparticle) and some like Au or chlorophyll nanoparticles, showing insignificant or even reverse trends. Interestingly, the cooling is invariably associated with the 77K spectra of the thylakoid suspension. With reference to the dark control, an agent causing cooling always increases PSII to PSI ratio and vice versa i.e.,the uphill energy transport. Importantly, the cooling effect, apart from its import role in plant physiology can be exploited artificially for energy saving in post-harvest or food preservation.

bioengineering