bioRxiv ScienceSearch

Biology subjects

Semework, M.

Publications and source records attributed to Semework, M..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Electrophysiological evidence for cerebellar involvement in higher-order cognitive processing

Although the cerebellum has been traditionally considered to be exclusively involved in motor control and learning, recent anatomical and clinical studies suggest that it may also have a role in cognition. However, no electrophysiological evidence exists to support this claim. Here we studied the activity of simple spikes of hand-movement related Purkinje cells in the mid-lateral cerebellum when monkeys learned to associate a well-learned right or left-hand movement with one of two visual symbolic cues. The cells had distinctly different discharge patterns between an overtrained symbol-hand association and a novel symbol-hand association although the kinematics of the movement did not change between the two conditions. The activity change was not related to the pattern of the visual symbols, the hand making the movement, the monkeys reaction times or the novelty of the visual symbols. We suggest that mid-lateral cerebellum is involved in higher-order cognitive processing related to learning a new visuomotor association.\n\nOne Sentence SummaryHand-movement related Purkinje neurons in midlateral cerebellum, which discharge during an overtrained visuomotor association task, change their activity when the monkey has to associate the same movements with new cues, even though the kinematics of the movements do not change.

neuroscience

A spatial memory signal shows that the parietal cortex has access to a craniotopic representation of space

Humans effortlessly establish a gist-like memory of their environment whenever they enter a new place. They can then use this memory to guide action even in the absence of vision. Neurons in the lateral intraparietal area (LIP) of the monkey exhibit a form of this environmental memory, responding when a monkey makes a saccade that brings the spatial location of a stimulus that appeared on a number of prior trials, but not on the present trial into their receptive fields. The stimulus need never have appeared in the receptive field of the neuron. This response is usually weaker with a longer latency than the neuron's visual response. We suggest that these results demonstrate that LIP has access to a craniotopic memory of space, which is activated when the spatial location of the vanished stimulus can be described by a retinotopic vector from the center of gaze to the stimulus.

neuroscience