Biology subjects

Segelbacher, G.

Publications and source records attributed to Segelbacher, G..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

PoLoCo: A reproducible pooled low-coverage workflow for draft genome assembly and allele frequency analysis from ethanol-preserved small non-model invertebrates

Abstract Background Many ecologically important small invertebrates are preserved in ethanol, which compromises DNA integrity and severely limits their potential to be utilized in further genomic research. The lack of soil arthropod representation ultimately results in limited availability of reference genomes and population genomic inference from pooled sequencing (Pool-seq). Results We introduce PoLoCo (Pooled Low-Coverage), a reproducible workflow integrating pooled specimen draft genome assembly from ethanol-preserved specimens with population-level allele-frequency analysis. We assembled a 411 Mb draft genome of Entomobrya nivalis from pooled short reads, achieving 97.7% BUSCO completeness despite notable fragmentation. Comparison with the published reference genome showed partial genomic correspondence while also revealing reference-dependent differences in the retained SNP datasets. The application of PoLoCo to 82 retained pooled populations produced a final distance-thinned allele-frequency dataset suitable for population-scale genomic inference. Case-study execution documented the computational requirements of the major workflow components on standard HPC infrastructure, with the workflow, documentation, and software environments openly available in Zenodo. Conclusions PoLoCo demonstrates that draft genome assemblies and reproducible Pool-seq allele-frequency analyses can be performed with long-preserved sample material from the field. PoLoCo integrates reference construction, sync-based allele-frequency analysis, and benchmarking into a free and open workflow. It establishes a reproducibility benchmark for biodiversity genomics and yields a transferable workflow for ecological and evolutionary initiatives where high-quality DNA or long-read sequencing is not feasible.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2023

Conserving genetic diversity during climate change:Niche marginality and discrepant monitoring capacity in Europe

Genetic monitoring of populations currently attracts interest in the context of the Convention on Biological Diversity but needs long-term planning and investments. Genetic diversity has been largely neglected in biodiversity monitoring, and when addressed is treated separately, detached from other conservation issues, such as habitat alteration due to climate change. Genetic monitoring supports the conservation and management of fisheries, game, and threatened populations. It also can contribute to the assessment of predicted and realized impacts of climate change, and their management. We report the first accounting of genetic monitoring efforts among countries in Europe (their genetic monitoring capacity, GMC) to determine where GMC suggests the combination of national infrastructure, political support and resources for continued and expanded monitoring. Overlaying GMC with areas where species ranges approach current and future climate niche limits (i.e., niche marginality) helps identify whether GMC coincides with anticipated climate change effects on biodiversity. Our analysis suggests that country area extent, financial resources, and conservation policy influence GMC, high values of which inconsistently match joint species patterns of climate niche marginality. Populations at niche margins likely hold genetic diversity that is important to adaptation to changing climate, and our results illuminate the need in Europe for expanded genetic monitoring across the climate gradients occupied by species, a need arguably greatest in southeastern European countries.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2022

Genomic erosion in the assessment of species extinction risk and recovery potential

Many species are undergoing rapid population declines and environmental deterioration, leading to genomic erosion, the loss of genetic diversity, accumulation of deleterious mutations, maladaptation, and introgression, that undermines fitness and long-term viability. Critically, this process continues even after demographic recovery due to a time-lagged genetic burden known as drift debt. Current conservation assessments, such as the IUCN Red List, focus on short-term extinction risk and do not capture the long-term consequences of genomic erosion. Likewise, the longer-term assessments of the IUCN Green Status may overestimate population recovery by failing to account for the lasting effects of genomic erosion. As genome sequencing becomes increasingly accessible, there is a growing opportunity to quantify genomic erosion and integrate it into conservation planning. Here, we use genomic simulations to illustrate how how different genomic metrics are sensitive to the drift debt. We test how ancestral effective population size (Ne) and bottleneck history influence the tempo and severity of genomic erosion, and demonstrate how these dynamics shape genetic load and additive genetic variation, key indicators of long-term evolutionary potential. Finally, we present a proof-of-concept for a Genomic Green Status framework that aligns genomic metrics with conservation impact assessments, laying the foundation for genomics-informed strategies to support species recovery.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2020

Reporting to the Convention on Biology Diversity: How are countries assessing and protecting their genetic diversity?

Genetic diversity is critically important for all species-domesticated and wild- to adapt to environmental change, and for ecosystem resilience to extreme events. International agreements such as the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) have committed to conserve and sustainably and equitably use all levels of biodiversity-genes, species and ecosystems-globally. However, assessment and monitoring of genetic diversity are often overlooked, and there are large knowledge and policy gaps regarding genetic diversity conservation. In this study, we present the first quantitative analysis of genetic diversity assessments conducted by Parties to the CBD. We conducted a detailed, systematic analysis of 114 CBD 5th (submitted 2014) and 6th (submitted 2018) National Reports to quantitatively assess actions, progress on targets, values and indicators related to genetic diversity. First, we found that the importance of genetic diversity is recognised by most Parties to the CBD, and that recognition increased over time. However, genetic targets mainly addressed genetic diversity within cultivated plants, farm animals, and crop wild relatives, with little focus on other wild species. Also, actions for conserving genetic diversity primarily concerned ex-situ facilities and policy, rather than monitoring and intervention for maintaining genetic diversity in situ. The most commonly used indicators of genetic diversity status were the number of genetic resources in conservation facilities, number of threatened breeds, and Red List Index, which are not well correlated to genetic erosion in most species -- highlighting that genetic change is poorly monitored by current indicators. Lastly, analyses of genetic data observations, indigenous use and knowledge of genetic diversity, and strategies being developed and implemented to conserve genetic diversity are highly under-reported. We make several recommendations for the post-2020 CBD Biodiversity Framework to improve awareness, assessment, and monitoring, and facilitate consistent and complete reporting of progress of genetic diversity in future National Reports. Article Impact StatementAn analysis of genetic diversity in CBD National Reports neglects non-domesticated species and demonstrates need for sufficient indicators.

scientific communication and education↗