Biology subjects

Seeber, J.

Publications and source records attributed to Seeber, J..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2024

Body size is a better predictor of intra- than interspecific variation of animal stoichiometry across realms

Animal stoichiometry affects fundamental processes ranging from organismal physiology to global element cycles. However, it is unknown whether animal stoichiometry follows predictable scaling relationships with body mass and whether adaptation to life on land or water constrains patterns of elemental allocation. To test both interspecific and intraspecific body-size scaling relationships of the nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and N:P content of animals, we used a subset of the StoichLife database encompassing 9,933 individual animals (vertebrates and invertebrates) belonging to 1,543 species spanning 10 orders of magnitude of body size from terrestrial, freshwater, and marine realms. Across species, body mass did not explain much variation in %N and %P composition, although the %P of invertebrates decreased with size. The effects of body size on species elemental content were small in comparison to the effects of taxonomy. Body size was a better predictor of intraspecific than interspecific elemental patterns. Between 42 to 45% in intraspecific stoichiometric variation was explained by body size for 27% of vertebrate species and 35% of invertebrate species. Further, differences between organisms inhabiting aquatic and terrestrial realms were observed only in invertebrate interspecific %N, suggesting that the realm does not play an important role in determining elemental allocation of animals. Based on our analysis of the most comprehensive animal stoichiometry database, we conclude that (i) both body size and realm are relatively weak predictors of animal stoichiometry across taxa, and (ii) body size is a good predictor of intraspecific variation in animal elemental content, which is consistent with tissue-scaling relationships that hold broadly across large groups of animals. This research reveals a lack of general scaling patterns in the elemental content across animals and instead points to a large variation in scaling relationships within and among lineages.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2023

Biodiversity in mountain soils above the treeline

Despite the importance of healthy soils for human livelihood, wellbeing, and safety, current gaps in our knowledge and understanding of biodiversity in soil are numerous, undermining conservation efforts. These gaps are particularly wide in mountain regions where healthy soils are especially important for human safety and yet evidence is accumulating of ongoing degradation, posing significant threats to ecosystem functioning and human settlements. To analyse these gaps in detail, we synthesise current research on the global diversity of microorganisms, cryptogams, and invertebrates in mountain soils above the treeline. This synthesis is based on a semi-quantitative survey of the literature and an expert-based analysis. Our work reveals not only deficiencies in geographic cover but also significant gaps in taxonomic coverage, particularly among soil protists and invertebrates, and a lack of (functional and ecological) description of the uncultivated majority of prokaryotes, fungi, and protists. We subsequently build on this overview to highlight opportunities for research on mountain soils as systems of co-occurring species that interact in complex environmental matrices to fulfil critical functions and make essential contributions to life on land. Closing gaps in biodiversity research in mountain soil is crucial to enhance our understanding and to promote laws and guidelines advancing international soil biodiversity conservation targets in mountains. Addressing sparse and biased data, recognizing the impact of environmental changes on mountain ecosystems, and advocating dedicated policies are essential strategies to safeguard mountain soils and their biodiversity. GLOSSARY O_TBL View this table: org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@16682fdorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@121b9feorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@139eadeorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@16abd74org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@bc3da9_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_TBL C_TBL

ecology↗

bioRxiv2022

Comparison of microbial communities from diverse biological matrices using mock community as an in situ positive control

Metataxonomy has become the standard for characterizing the diversity and composition of microbial communities associated with multicellular organisms and their environment. Understanding the interactions between the microbiotas within the same ecosystem is essential for fully understanding the role of microorganisms in evolutionary and ecological processes; however, such comparative studies across diverse biological samples are rare. In particular, currently available protocols assume a uniform DNA extraction, amplification and sequencing efficiency for all sample types and taxa. The addition of a mock community (MC) to biological samples before the DNA extraction step could aid identification of technical biases, but the impact of MC on diversity estimates is unknown. Here, standardized aliquots of bovine faecal samples with high or low biomass were extracted with high or low doses of MC, characterized using standard Illumina technology for metataxonomics, and analysed with custom bioinformatic pipelines. We showed that a MC was an informative in situ positive control provided an estimate of 16S rRNA sample gene copies (which allowed a more direct measure of community size), and detected sample outliers. However, we also demonstrated that if the recommended dose of MC is added to a sample with low biomass, diversity estimates were distorted. Using our results, we recommend MC doses for a range of sample types, including rhizosphere soil, whole invertebrates, and vertebrate faecal samples. ImportanceThe simultaneous processing of the sample microbiota with a known number of readily identifiable MC cells (co-extracted with the sample cells) or SNA (co-amplified with the sample DNAs) can be a valuable in situ positive control. However, guidelines regarding their application are very limited and do not consider the effect of these controls on sample diversity estimates. We demonstrate that a MC co-extracted with the study sample provides several advantages, such as highlighting bias in DNA extraction of gram positive, identifying potential sample outliers and inferring the number of 16S rRNA gene copies in the sample. However, the incorporation of a MC requires prior knowledge of sample biomass, as high ratios of MC to sample microbiota lead to biased sample diversity estimates. Practical advice on determining the appropriate MC dose for a wide range of sample types, including rhizosphere soil, whole invertebrates and mammalian faecal samples are provided.

ecology↗

bioRxiv2022

Global monitoring of soil animal communities using a common methodology

Here we introduce the Soil BON Foodweb Team, a cross-continental collaborative network that aims to monitor soil animal communities and food webs using consistent methodology at a global scale. Soil animals support vital soil processes via soil structure modification, direct consumption of dead organic matter, and interactions with microbial and plant communities. Soil animal effects on ecosystem functions have been demonstrated by correlative analyses as well as in laboratory and field experiments, but these studies typically focus on selected animal groups or species at one or few sites with limited variation in environmental conditions. The lack of comprehensive harmonised large-scale soil animal community data including microfauna, mesofauna, and macrofauna, in conjunction with related soil functions, limits our understanding of biological interactions in soil communities and how these interactions affect ecosystem functioning. To provide such data, the Soil BON Foodweb Team invites researchers worldwide to use a common methodology to address six long-term goals: (1) to collect globally representative harmonised data on soil micro-, meso-, and macrofauna communities; (2) to describe key environmental drivers of soil animal communities and food webs; (3) to assess the efficiency of conservation approaches for the protection of soil animal communities; (4) to describe soil food webs and their association with soil functioning globally; (5) to establish a global research network for soil biodiversity monitoring and collaborative projects in related topics; (6) to reinforce local collaboration networks and expertise and support capacity building for soil animal research around the world. In this paper, we describe the vision of the global research network and the common sampling protocol to assess soil animal communities and advocate for the use of standard methodologies across observational and experimental soil animal studies. We will use this protocol to conduct soil animal assessments and reconstruct soil food webs on the sites included in the global soil biodiversity monitoring network, Soil BON, allowing us to assess linkages among soil biodiversity, vegetation, soil physico-chemical properties, and ecosystem functions. In the present paper, we call for researchers especially from countries and ecoregions that remain underrepresented in the majority of soil biodiversity assessments to join us. Together we will be able to provide science-based evidence to support soil biodiversity conservation and functioning of terrestrial ecosystems.

ecology↗