Biology subjects

Schone, H. R.

Publications and source records attributed to Schone, H. R..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

Centrally generated movement-related signals engage ipsilateral S1 finger representations after tetraplegia

Ipsilateral primary somatosensory cortex (S1) exhibits somatotopically organized activity during unilateral hand movements, but whether this activity depends on peripheral input remains debated. We addressed this question using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in 14 individuals with tetraplegia and 18 able-bodied controls. Participants performed or attempted individual finger movements during 3T fMRI. We quantified movement-related univariate activity and multivariate representational structure within ipsilateral S1. Univariate activity within the anatomically defined ipsilateral S1 hand area did not differ significantly between groups, whereas a continuous spatial analysis identified greater movement-related activity in individuals with tetraplegia in S1 bands lateral to the hand representation. Multivariate analyses revealed reliable separation of finger-specific activity patterns in both groups, with no significant group difference in mean inter-finger distance. The typicality of the overall representational geometry also did not differ significantly between groups. Finally, a person with complete hand paralysis and no measurable feeling or movement still showed clear, finger-specific brain activity patterns and a typical representation of the affected hand. Together, these findings indicate that centrally generated movement-related signals can engage finger-specific representations in ipsilateral S1 without overt movement or measurable hand-related peripheral input. Ipsilateral somatotopic activity therefore cannot be explained solely by sensory reafference from the moving hand.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2023

Stable Cortical Body Maps Before and After Arm Amputation

The adult brains capacity for cortical reorganization remains debated. Using longitudinal neuroimaging in three adults, followed up to five years before and after arm amputation, we compared cortical activity elicited by movement of the hand (pre-amputation) versus phantom hand (post-amputation) and lips (pre/post-amputation). We observed stable representations of both hand and lips. By directly quantifying activity changes across amputation, we overturn decades of animal and human research, demonstrating amputation does not trigger large- scale cortical reorganization.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2023

Should bionic limb control mimic the human body? Impact of control strategy on bionic hand skill learning

A longstanding engineering ambition has been to design anthropomorphic bionic limbs: devices that look like and are controlled in the same way as the biological body (biomimetic). The untested assumption is that biomimetic motor control enhances device embodiment, learning, generalization, and automaticity. To test this, we compared biomimetic and non-biomimetic control strategies for able-bodied participants when learning to operate a wearable myoelectric bionic hand. We compared motor learning across days and behavioural tasks for two training groups: Biomimetic (mimicking the desired bionic hand gesture with biological hand) and Arbitrary control (mapping an unrelated biological hand gesture with the desired bionic gesture). For both trained groups, training improved bionic limb control, reduced cognitive reliance, and increased embodiment over the bionic hand. Biomimetic users had more intuitive and faster control early in training. Arbitrary users matched biomimetic performance later in training. Further, arbitrary users showed increased generalization to a novel control strategy. Collectively, our findings suggest that biomimetic and arbitrary control strategies provide different benefits. The optimal strategy is likely not strictly biomimetic, but rather a flexible strategy within the biomimetic to arbitrary spectrum, depending on the user, available training opportunities and user requirements.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2021

Early life experience sets hard limits on motor learning as evidenced from artificial arm use

The study or artificial arms provides a unique opportunity to address long-standing questions on sensorimotor plasticity and development. Learning to use an artificial arm arguably depends on fundamental building blocks of body representation and would therefore be impacted by early-life experience. We tested artificial arm motor-control in two adult populations with upper-limb deficiency: congenital one-handers - who were born with a partial arm, and amputees - who lost their biological arm in adulthood. Brain plasticity research teaches us that the earlier we train to acquire new skills (or use a new technology) the better we benefit from this practice as adults. Instead, we found that although one-hander started using an artificial arm as toddlers, they produced increased error noise and directional errors when reaching to visual targets, relative to amputees who performed similarly to controls. However, the earlier a one-hander was fitted with an artificial arm the better their motor control was. We suggest that visuomotor integration, underlying the observed deficits, is highly dependent on either biological or artificial arm experience at a very young age. Subsequently, opportunities for sensorimotor plasticity become more limited.

neuroscience↗