Biology subjects

Schoepflin, R.

Publications and source records attributed to Schoepflin, R..

6 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2024

Temporally restricted activities of En1 regulatory elements underlie distinct limb malformations

The precise spatiotemporal regulation of developmental genes is required for proper organogenesis. Engrailed-1 (En1) is essential for dorsal-ventral patterning during mouse limb development from embryonic day E9.5 to E11.5. Previously, we identified the long non-coding RNA locus Maenli, which drives limb-specific En1 expression at E9.5. In this study, we investigated the regulatory mechanisms sustaining En1 expression at later developmental stages when Maenli transcriptional activity is drastically reduced. Using in vivo CRISPR editing, we identified two intergenic enhancer elements, LSEE1 and LSEE2, that maintain En1 expression at E10.5 and E11.5. Mice lacking these enhancers exhibit only a subset of the limb malformations observed in En1 and Maenli mutants, indicating that the timing of En1 misexpression causes distinct phenotypes. These findings underscore the role of temporally restricted activities of cis-regulatory elements, including lncRNA loci and enhancers, in modulating gene expression and explaining subtle differences in complex disease phenotypes.

developmental biology↗

bioRxiv2022

Combinatorial effects on gene expression at the Lbx1/Fgf8 locus resolve Split-Hand/Foot Malformation type 3

Split-Hand/Foot Malformation type 3 (SHFM3) is a congenital limb malformation associated with tandem duplications at the LBX1/FGF8 locus. Yet, the disease patho-mechanism remains unsolved. Here we investigated the functional consequences of SHFM3-associated rearrangements on chromatin conformation and gene expression in vivo in transgenic mice. We show that the Lbx1/Fgf8 locus consists of two separate, but interacting, regulatory domains. Re-engineering of a SHFM3-associated duplication and a newly reported inversion in mice resulted in restructuring of the chromatin architecture. This led to an ectopic activation of the Lbx1 and Btrc genes in the apical ectodermal ridge (AER) in an Fgf8-like pattern. Artificial repositioning of the AER-specific enhancers of Fgf8 was sufficient to induce misexpression of Lbx1 and Btrc. We provide evidence that the SHFM3 phenotype is the result of a combinatorial effect on gene misexpression and dosage in the developing limb. Our results reveal new insights into the molecular mechanism underlying SHFM3 and provide novel conceptual framework for how genomic rearrangements can cause gene misexpression and disease.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2021

Promoter repression and 3D-restructuring resolves divergent developmental gene expression in TADs

Cohesin loop extrusion facilitates precise gene expression by continuously driving promoters to sample all enhancers located within the same topologically-associated domain (TAD). However, many TADs contain multiple genes with divergent expression patterns, thereby indicating additional forces further refine how enhancer activities are utilised. Here, we unravel the mechanisms enabling a new gene, Rex1, to emerge with divergent expression within the ancient Fat1 TAD in placental mammals. We show that such divergent expression is not determined by a strict enhancer-promoter compatibility code, intra-TAD position or nuclear envelope-attachment. Instead, TAD-restructuring in embryonic stem cells (ESCs) separates Rex1 and Fat1 with distinct proximal enhancers that independently drive their expression. By contrast, in later embryonic tissues, DNA methylation renders the inactive Rex1 promoter profoundly unresponsive to Fat1 enhancers within the intact TAD. Combined, these features adapted an ancient regulatory landscape during evolution to support two entirely independent Rex1 and Fat1 expression programs. Thus, rather than operating only as rigid blocks of co-regulated genes, TAD-regulatory landscapes can orchestrate complex divergent expression patterns in evolution. HIGHLIGHTSO_LINew genes can emerge in evolution without taking on the expression pattern of their surrounding pre-existing TAD. C_LIO_LICompartmentalisation can restructure seemingly evolutionarily stable TADs to control a promoters access to enhancers. C_LIO_LILamina-associated domains neither prevent transcriptional activation nor enhancer-promoter communication. C_LIO_LIRepression rather than promoter-specificity refines when genes respond to promiscuous enhancer activities in specific tissues. C_LI

genetics↗

bioRxiv2021

Distal and proximal cis-regulatory elements sense X-chromosomal dosage and developmental state at the Xist locus

Developmental genes such as Xist, the master regulator of X-chromosome inactivation (XCI), are controlled by complex cis-regulatory landscapes, which decode multiple signals to establish specific spatio-temporal expression patterns. Xist integrates information on X-chromosomal dosage and developmental stage to trigger XCI at the primed pluripotent state in females only. Through a pooled CRISPR interference screen in differentiating mouse embryonic stem cells, we identify functional enhancer elements of Xist during the onset of random XCI. By quantifying how enhancer activity is modulated by X-dosage and differentiation, we find that X-dosage controls the promoter-proximal region in a binary switch-like manner. By contrast, differentiation cues activate a series of distal elements and bring them into closer spatial proximity of the Xist promoter. The strongest distal element is part of an enhancer cluster [~]200 kb upstream of the Xist gene which is associated with a previously unannotated Xist-enhancing regulatory transcript, we named Xert. Developmental cues and X-dosage are thus decoded by distinct regulatory regions, which cooperate to ensure female-specific Xist upregulation at the correct developmental time. Our study is the first step to disentangle how multiple, functionally distinct regulatory regions interact to generate complex expression patterns in mammals.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2019

Enhancer hijacking determines intra- and extrachromosomal circular MYCN amplicon architecture in neuroblastoma

MYCN amplification drives one in six cases of neuroblastoma. The supernumerary gene copies are commonly found on highly rearranged, extrachromosomal circular DNA. The exact amplicon structure has not been described thus far and the functional relevance of its rearrangements is unknown. Here, we analyzed the MYCN amplicon structure and its chromatin landscape. This revealed two distinct classes of amplicons which explain the regulatory requirements for MYCN overexpression. The first class always co-amplified a proximal enhancer driven by the noradrenergic core regulatory circuit (CRC). The second class of MYCN amplicons was characterized by high structural complexity, lacked key local enhancers, and instead contained distal chromosomal fragments, which harbored CRC-driven enhancers. Thus, ectopic enhancer hijacking can compensate for the loss of local gene regulatory elements and explains a large component of the structural diversity observed in MYCN amplification.

cancer biology↗

bioRxiv2018

CRUP: A comprehensive framework to predict condition-specific regulatory units

We present the software CRUP (Condition-specific Regulatory Units Prediction) to infer from epigenetic marks a list of regulatory units consisting of dynamically changing enhancers with their target genes. The workflow consists of a novel pre-trained enhancer predictor that can be reliably applied across cell lines and species, solely based on histone modification ChIP-seq data. Enhancers are subsequently assigned to different conditions and correlated with gene expression to derive regulatory units. We thoroughly test and then apply CRUP to a rheumatoid arthritis model, identifying enhancer-gene pairs comprising known disease genes as well as new candidate genes.\n\nAvailabilityhttps://github.com/VerenaHeinrich/CRUP

bioinformatics↗