bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Schneiderman, J. F.

Publications and source records attributed to Schneiderman, J. F..

7 recordsLinked to original sources

Spatial suppression in visual motion perception is driven by inhibition: evidence from MEG gamma oscillations

Spatial suppression (SS) is a visual perceptual phenomenon that is manifest in a reduction of directional sensitivity for drifting high-contrast gratings whose size exceeds the center of the visual field. Gratings moving at faster velocities induce stronger SS. The neural processes that give rise to such size- and velocity-dependent reductions in directional sensitivity are currently unknown, and the role of surround inhibition is unclear. In magnetoencephalogram (MEG), large high-contrast drifting gratings induce a strong gamma response (GR), which also attenuates with an increase in the gratings velocity. It has been suggested that the slope of this GR attenuation is mediated by inhibitory interactions in the primary visual cortex. Herein, we investigate whether SS is related to this inhibitory-based MEG measure. We evaluated SS and GR in two independent samples of participants: school-age boys and adult women. The slope of GR attenuation predicted inter-individual differences in SS in both samples. Test-retest reliability of the neuro-behavioral correlation was assessed in the adults, and was high between two sessions separated by several days or weeks. Neither frequencies nor absolute amplitudes of the GRs correlated with SS, which highlights the functional relevance of velocity-related changes in GR magnitude caused by augmentation of incoming input. Our findings provide evidence that links the psychophysical phenomenon of SS to inhibitory-based neural responses in the human primary visual cortex. This supports the role of inhibitory interactions as an important underlying mechanism for spatial suppression. HighlightsO_LIThe role of surround inhibition in perceptual spatial suppression (SS) is debated C_LIO_LIGR attenuation with increasing gratings velocity may reflect surround inhibition C_LIO_LIPeople with greater GR attenuation exhibit stronger SS C_LIO_LIThe neuro-behavioral correlation is replicated in school-age boys and adult women C_LIO_LIThe surround inhibition in the V1 is an important mechanism underlying SS C_LI

neuroscience↗

On-scalp MEG SQUIDs are sensitive to early somatosensory activity unseen by conventional MEG

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) has a unique capacity to resolve the spatio-temporal development of brain activity from non-invasive measurements. Conventional MEG, however, relies on sensors that sample from a distance (20-40 mm) to the head due to thermal insulation requirements (the MEG sensors function at 4 K in a helmet). A gain in signal strength and spatial resolution may be achieved if sensors are moved closer to the head. Here, we report a study comparing measurements from a seven-channel on-scalp SQUID MEG system to those from a conventional (in-helmet) SQUID MEG system.\n\nWe compared spatio-temporal resolution between on-scalp and conventional MEG by comparing the discrimination accuracy for neural activity patterns resulting from stimulating five different phalanges of the right hand. Because of proximity and sensor density differences between on-scalp and conventional MEG, we hypothesized that on-scalp MEG would allow for a more high-resolved assessment of these activity patterns, and therefore also a better classification performance in discriminating between neural activations from the different phalanges.\n\nWe observed that on-scalp MEG provided better classification performance during an early post-stimulus period (15-30 ms). This corresponded to electroencephalographic (EEG) response components N16 and P23, and was an unexpected observation as these components are usually not observed in conventional MEG. They indicate that on-scalp MEG opens up for a richer registration of the cortical signal, allowing for sensitivity to what are potentially sources in the thalamo-cortical radiation and to quasi-radial sources.\n\nWe had originally expected that on-scalp MEG would provide better classification accuracy based on activity in proximity to the P60m component compared to conventional MEG. This component indeed allowed for the best classification performance for both MEG systems (60-75%, chance 50%). However, we did not find that on-scalp MEG allowed for better classification than conventional MEG at this latency. We believe this may be due to the limited sensor coverage in the recording, in combination with our strategy for positioning the on-scalp MEG sensors. We discuss how sensor density and coverage as well as between-phalange source field dissimilarities may influence our hypothesis testing, which we believe to be useful for future benchmarking measurements.

neuroscience↗

Sensor localization using magnetic dipole-like coils: A method for highly accurate co-registration in on-scalp MEG

Source modelling in magnetoencephalography (MEG) requires precise co-registration of the sensor array and the anatomical structure of the measured individuals head. In conventional MEG, positions and orientations of the sensors relative to each other are fixed and known beforehand, requiring only localization of the head relative to the sensor array. Since the sensors in on-scalp MEG are positioned on the scalp, locations of the individual sensors depend on the subjects head shape and size. The positions and orientations of on-scalp sensors must therefore be measured at every recording. This can be achieved by inverting conventional head localization, localizing the sensors relative to the head - rather than the other way around.\n\nIn this study we present a practical method for localizing sensors using magnetic dipole-like coils attached to the subjects head. We implement and evaluate the method in a set of on-scalp MEG recordings using a 7-channel on-scalp MEG system based on high critical temperature superconducting quantum interference devices (high-Tc SQUIDs). The method provides accurate estimates of individual sensor positions and orientations with short averaging time ([&le;] 2 mm and < 3 degrees, respectively, with 1-second averaging), enabling continuous sensor localization. Calibrating and jointly localizing the sensor array can further improve the localization accuracy (< 1 mm and < 2.5 degrees, respectively, with 1-second coil recordings).\n\nWe demonstrate source localization of on-scalp recorded somatosensory evoked activity based on co-registration with our method. Equivalent current dipole fits of the evoked responses corresponded well (within 5.3 mm) with those based on a commercial, whole-head MEG system.

neuroscience↗

A 7-channel high-Tc SQUID-based on-scalp MEG system

Due to their higher operating temperature, high-Tc superconducting quantum interference devices (SQUIDs) require less thermal insulation than the low-Tc sensors that are utilized in commercial magnetoen-cephalography (MEG) systems. As a result, they can be placed closer to the head, where neuromagnetic fields are higher and more focal, potentially leading to higher spatial resolution. The first such on-scalp MEG measurements using high-Tc SQUIDs have shown the potential of the technology. In order to be useful for neuroscience and clinical applications, however, multi-channel systems are required. Herein, we present a 7-channel on-scalp MEG system based on high-Tc SQUIDs. The YBCO SQUID magnetometers are arranged in a dense, head-aligned hexagonal array inside a single, liquid nitrogen-cooled cryostat. The spacing between the magnetometers and the head is adjustable down to 1 mm. The sensors are side-mounted on the cryostat that is mounted on an articulated armature for recordings on arbitrary head locations of a seated subject. We demonstrate white noise levels of 50-130 fT/Hz1/2 at 10 Hz, sensor-to-sensor crosstalk values of <0.6%, and single-fill operation times of 16 hours. We validate the system with MEG recordings of visual alpha modulation and auditory evoked fields. The system is thus useful for densely and sensitively sampling neuromagnetic fields over any[~] 10 cm2 patch of the scalp surface over the course of a day.

neuroscience↗

Additive effect of contrast and velocity proves the role of strong excitatory drive in suppression of visual gamma response.

Visual gamma oscillations are generated through interactions of excitatory and inhibitory neurons and are strongly modulated by sensory input. A moderate increase in excitatory drive to the visual cortex via increasing contrast or motion velocity of drifting gratings results in strengthening of the gamma response (GR). However, increasing the velocity beyond some transition point leads to the suppression of the GR. There are two theoretical models that can explain such suppression. The excitatory drive model infers that, at high drifting rates, GR suppression is caused by excessive excitation of inhibitory neurons. Since contrast and velocity have an additive effect on excitatory drive, this model predicts that the GR transition point for low-contrast gratings would be reached at a higher velocity, as compared to high-contrast gratings. The alternative velocity tuning model implies that the GR is maximal when the drifting rate of the grating corresponds to the preferable velocity of the motion-sensitive V1 neurons. This model predicts that lowering contrast either will not affect the transition point or will shift it to a lower drifting rate. We tested these models with magnetoencephalography-based recordings of the GR during presentation of low (50%) and high (100%) contrast gratings drifting at four velocities. We found that lowering contrast led to a highly reliable shift of the GR suppression transition point to higher velocities, thus supporting the excitatory drive model. No effects of contrast or velocity were found for the alpha-beta response power. The results have important implications for the understanding of the neural mechanisms underlying gamma oscillations and the development of gamma-based biomarkers of brain disorders.

neuroscience↗

Neural gain control measured through cortical gamma oscillations is associated with individual variations in sensory sensitivity.

Gamma oscillations facilitate information processing by shaping the excitatory input/output of neuronal populations, and their suppression by strong excitatory drive may stem from inhibitory-based gain control of network excitation. Individual variations in the gamma suppression may therefore reflect efficiency of gain control and subjective sensitivity to everyday sensory events. To test this prediction, we assessed the link between self-reported sensory sensitivity and changes in magneto-encephalographic gamma oscillations as a function of motion velocity of high-contrast visual gratings. The induced gamma oscillations increased in frequency and decreased in power with increasing stimulation intensity. As expected, weaker suppression of the gamma response correlated with sensory hypersensitivity. Robustness of this result was confirmed by its replication in the two samples: neurotypical subjects and people with autism, who had generally higher sensory sensitivity. We conclude that intensity-related suppression of gamma response is a promising biomarker of homeostatic control of the excitation-inhibition balance in the visual cortex.

neuroscience↗

Modulation of visual gamma oscillation by excitatory drive and the excitation/inhibition balance in the visual cortex

Gamma-band oscillations arise from the interplay between neural excitation (E) and inhibition (I) and may provide a non-invasive window into the state of cortical circuitry. A bell-shaped modulation of gamma response power by increasing the intensity of sensory input was observed in animals and is thought to reflect neural gain control. Here we sought to find a similar input-output relationship in humans with MEG via modulating the intensity of a visual stimulation by changing the velocity/temporal-frequency of visual motion.\n\nIn the first experiment, adult participants observed static and moving gratings. The frequency of the MEG gamma response monotonically increased with motion velocity whereas power followed a bell-shape. In the second experiment, on a large group of children and adults, we found that despite drastic developmental changes in frequency and power of gamma oscillations, the relative suppression at high motion velocities was scaled to the same range of values across the life-span.\n\nIn light of animal and modeling studies, the modulation of gamma power and frequency at high stimulation intensities characterizes the capacity of inhibitory neurons to counterbalance increasing excitation in visual networks. Gamma suppression may thus provide a non-invasive measure of inhibitory-based gain control in the healthy and diseased brain.

neuroscience↗