Schiele, M. A. | bioRxiv Science

bioRxiv2025

Dynamic Epigenetic Changes During Antidepressant Pharmacotherapy in Major Depressive Disorder

Although antidepressants remain the main pharmacological treatment for major depressive disorder (MDD), therapeutic response varies, highlighting the need for molecular markers that predict treatment response, as well as insights into the biological processes underlying antidepressant efficacy. Candidate-gene and cross-sectional epigenome-wide association studies (EWAS) have reported DNA methylation signatures associated with antidepressant response; however, findings remain inconsistent. To date, no longitudinal EWAS has examined methylation trajectories across multiple time points during antidepressant treatment in MDD. Within the Early Medication Change trial, DNA methylation data was generated for 162 patients with MDD (81 responders, 81 non-responders) and 48 matched healthy controls. Patients were assessed at four times across eight-weeks of standardized antidepressant treatment, while controls were assessed twice. Differentially methylated positions (DMPs) and regions (DMRs) were identified using longitudinal EWAS models and the comb-p algorithm. Baseline methylation levels were associated with depressive symptom severity at day 28 and day 56 through two and six DMRs, respectively (e.g., TNRC6C, CAT), whereas no single DMP reached significance. Longitudinal analyses identified one DMP associated with improvement in depressive symptoms (YLMP1) and three DMRs showing methylation changes over time (e.g., GPR126, PM20D1). Combined patient-control analyses revealed additional DMPs and DMRs associated with diagnosis and temporal effects. This study provides first longitudinal evidence of regionally coordinated DNA methylation changes during antidepressant pharmacotherapy, revealing alterations in genes involved in neuroplasticity and inflammatory processes that are associated with clinical response. Replication and functional validation will be essential to determine their relevance for personalized antidepressant treatment.

genomics↗

bioRxiv2023

Reduced discrimination between signals of danger and safety but not overgeneralization is linked to exposure to childhood adversity in healthy adults

Childhood adversity is a strong predictor of developing psychopathological conditions. Multiple theories on the mechanisms underlying this association have been suggested which, however, differ in the operationalization of exposure. Altered (threat) learning mechanisms represent central mechanisms by which environmental inputs shape emotional and cognitive processes and ultimately behavior. 1402 healthy participants underwent a fear conditioning paradigm (acquisition training, generalization), while acquiring skin conductance responses (SCRs) and ratings (arousal, valence, and contingency). Childhood adversity was operationalized as (1) dichotomization, and following (2) the specificity model, (3) the cumulative risk model, and (4) the dimensional model. Individuals exposed to childhood adversity showed blunted physiological reactivity in SCRs, but not ratings, and reduced CS+/CS-discrimination during both phases, mainly driven by attenuated CS + responding. The latter was evident across different operationalizations of exposure following the different theories. None of the theories tested showed clear explanatory superiority. Notably, a remarkably different pattern of increased responding to the CS-is reported in the literature for anxiety patients, suggesting that individuals exposed to childhood adversity may represent a specific sub-sample. We highlight that theories linking childhood adversity to (vulnerability to) psychopathology need refinement.

neuroscience↗