bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Schieber, M.

Publications and source records attributed to Schieber, M..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Neural Synchrony Links Sensorimotor Cortices in a Network for Facial Motor Control

Primate societies rely on the production and interpretation of social signals, in particular those displayed by the face. Facial movements are controlled, according to the dominant neuropsychological schema, by two separate circuits, one originating in medial frontal cortex controlling emotional expressions, and a second one originating in lateral motor and premotor areas controlling voluntary facial movements. Despite this functional dichotomy, cortical anatomy suggests that medial and lateral areas are directly connected and may thus operate as a single network. Here we test these contrasting hypotheses through structural and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) guided electrical stimulation and simultaneous multi-channel recordings from key facial motor areas in the macaque monkey brain. These areas include medial facial motor area M3 (located in the anterior cingulate cortex); two lateral face-related motor areas: M1 (primary motor) and PMv (ventrolateral premotor); and S1 (primary somatosensory cortex). Cortical responses evoked by intracortical stimulation revealed that medial and lateral areas can exert significant functional impact on each other. Simultaneous recordings of local field potentials in all facial motor areas further confirm that during facial expressions, medial and lateral facial motor areas significantly interact, primarily in the alpha and beta frequency ranges, whereas during voluntary chewing, coupling occurs at lower frequencies. These functional interactions varied across facial movement types. Thus, at the cortical level, the control of facial movements is not mediated through independent (medial/lateral) functional streams, but results from an interacting sensorimotor network. Significance StatementPrimates communicate through facial expressions. How the brain generates facial expressions remains poorly understood. To uncover how facial motor-related cortical brain regions interact to produce facial gestures, we combined fMRI-targeted electrophysiology and intracortical microstimulation while monkeys produced qualitatively different facial movements. Our two-pronged experimental approach revealed that facial motor-related cortical areas form an interconnected network characterized by synchronized neural activity demonstrating dynamic expression-selective activity states that are coordinated across the network nodes. Thus, the multiple facial motor-related cortical areas sending axons directly into the facial nucleus operate as a single network in which the overall complex, behavior-specific inter-areal interactions dictate the relevant motor output.

neuroscience↗

Progressively shifting patterns of co-modulation among premotor cortex neurons carry dynamically similar signals during action execution and observation

Neurons in macaque premotor cortex show firing rate modulation whether the subject performs an action or observes another individual performing a similar action. Although such mirror neurons have been thought to have highly congruent discharge during execution and observation, many if not most, show non-congruent activity. Studies of reaching movements, for which low-dimensional neural trajectories exhibit comparatively simple dynamical motifs, have shown that these prevalent patterns of co-modulation pass through subspaces which are shared in part, but in part are visited exclusively during either execution or observation. The neural dynamics of hand movements are more complex, however. We developed a novel approach to examine prevalent patterns of co-modulation during execution and observation of a task that involved reaching, grasping, and manipulation. Rather than following neural trajectories in subspaces that contain their entire time course, we identified time series of instantaneous subspaces, calculated principal angles among them, sampled trajectory segments at the times of selected behavioral events, and projected those segments into the time series of instantaneous subspaces. These instantaneous neural subspaces most often remained distinct during execution versus observation. Nevertheless, latent dynamics during execution and observation could be partially aligned with canonical correlation, indicating some similarity of the relationships among neural representations of different movements relative to one another during execution and observation. We also found that during action execution, mirror neurons showed consistent patterns of co-modulation both within and between sessions, but other non-mirror neurons that were modulated only during action execution and not during observation showed considerable variability of co-modulation.

neuroscience↗