Biology subjects

Schiebenhoefer, H.

Publications and source records attributed to Schiebenhoefer, H..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2026

ProteoDUDes: Taxonomic profiling for metaproteomics with false positive reduction

Metaproteomics is the investigation of the protein composition of multi-organism samples. While metagenomics answers the question which organisms are present in a sample, metaproteomics additionally answers the question which organisms are active. State-of-the-art tools for annotating proteomic data with taxonomic information (e.g. Unipept, DIAMOND) do not control the false taxonomic identification rate, which can lead to incorrect results and thus incorrect interpretations, as we demonstrate with examples. ProteoDUDes processes the results from popular sequence annotation tools so that the proportion of true identifications in the result is at as high as or higher than in the the compared tools. We evaluate ProteoDUDes on simulated data and experimental mock community data. Our results indicate that ProteoDUDes has the same error rate as other tools on simulated data and half the error rate on the experimental mock community data. This allows more accurate statements to be made about which organisms are functionally active in a complex sample. ProteoDUDes is open-source and available at https://github.com/pirovc/dudes.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2021

Critical Assessment of Metaproteome Investigation (CAMPI): a Multi-Lab Comparison of Established Workflows

Metaproteomics has matured into a powerful tool to assess functional interactions in microbial communities. While many metaproteomic workflows are available, the impact of method choice on results remains unclear. Here, we carried out the first community-driven, multi-laboratory comparison in metaproteomics: the critical assessment of metaproteome investigation study (CAMPI). Based on well-established workflows, we evaluated the effect of sample preparation, mass spectrometry, and bioinformatic analysis using two samples: a simplified, laboratory-assembled human intestinal model and a human fecal sample. We observed that variability at the peptide level was predominantly due to sample processing workflows, with a smaller contribution of bioinformatic pipelines. These peptide-level differences largely disappeared at the protein group level. While differences were observed for predicted community composition, similar functional profiles were obtained across workflows. CAMPI demonstrates the robustness of present-day metaproteomics research, serves as a template for multi-laboratory studies in metaproteomics, and provides publicly available data sets for benchmarking future developments.

microbiology↗

bioRxiv2020

MegaGO: a fast yet powerful approach to assess functional similarity across meta-omics data sets

The study of microbiomes has gained in importance over the past few years, and has led to the fields of metagenomics, metatranscriptomics and metaproteomics. While initially focused on the study of biodiversity within these communities the emphasis has increasingly shifted to the study of (changes in) the complete set of functions available in these communities. A key tool to study this functional complement of a microbiome is Gene Ontology (GO) term analysis. However, comparing large sets of GO terms is not an easy task due to the deeply branched nature of GO, which limits the utility of exact term matching. To solve this problem, we here present MegaGO, a user-friendly tool that relies on semantic similarity between GO terms to compute functional similarity between two data sets. MegaGO is highly performant: each set can contain thousands of GO terms, and results are calculated in a matter of seconds. MegaGO is available as a web application at https://megago.ugent.be and installable via pip as a standalone command line tool and reusable software library. All code is open source under the MIT license, and is available at https://github.com/MEGA-GO/.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2020

Survey of metaproteomics software tools for functional microbiome analysis.

To gain a thorough appreciation of microbiome dynamics, researchers characterize the functional role of expressed microbial genes/proteins. This can be accomplished through metaproteomics, which characterizes the protein complement of the microbiome. Several software tools exist for analyzing microbiomes at the functional level by measuring their combined proteome-level response to environmental perturbations. In this survey, we explore the performance of six available tools, so that researchers can make informed decisions regarding software choice based on their research goals. Tandem mass spectrometry-based proteomic data obtained from dental carie plaque samples grown with and without sucrose in paired biofilm reactors were used as representative data for this evaluation. Microbial peptides from one sample pair were identified by the X! Tandem search algorithm via SearchGUI and subjected to functional analysis using software tools including eggNOG-mapper, MEGAN6, MetaGOmics, MetaProteomeAnalyzer (MPA), ProPHAnE, and Unipept to generate functional annotation through Gene Ontology (GO) terms. Among these software tools, notable differences in functional annotation were detected after comparing differentially expressed protein functional groups. Based on the generated GO terms of these tools we performed a peptide-level comparison to evaluate the quality of their functional annotations. A BLAST analysis against the Universal Protein Knowledgebase revealed that the sensitivity and specificity of functional annotation differed between tools. For example, eggNOG-mapper mapped to the most number of GO terms, while Unipept generated the most precise GO terms. Based on our evaluation, metaproteomics researchers can choose the software according to their analytical needs and developers can use the resulting feedback to further optimize their algorithms. To make more of these tools accessible via scalable metaproteomics workflows, eggNOG-mapper and Unipept 4.0 were incorporated into the Galaxy platform.

bioinformatics↗