bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Schicklin, S.

Publications and source records attributed to Schicklin, S..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Clinical metagenomics bioinformatics pipeline for the identification of hospital-acquired pneumonia pathogens antibiotic resistance genes from bronchoalveolar lavage samples

BackgroundShortening the time-to-result for pathogen detection and identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing for patients with Hospital-Acquired and Ventilator-Associated pneumonia (HAP-VAP) is of great interest. For this purpose, clinical metagenomics is a promising non-hypothesis driven alternative to traditional culture-based solutions: when mature, it would allow direct sequencing all microbial genomes present in a BronchoAlveolar Lavage (BAL) sample with the purpose of simultaneously identifying pathogens and Antibiotic Resistance Genes (ARG). In this study, we describe a new bioinformatics method to detect pathogens and their ARG with good accuracy, both in mono- and polymicrobial samples. MethodsThe standard approach (hereafter called TBo), that consists in taxonomic binning of metagenomic reads followed by an assembly step, suffers from lack of sensitivity for ARG detection. Thus, we propose a new bioinformatics approach (called TBwDM) with both models and databases optimized for HAP-VAP, that performs reads mapping against ARG reference database in parallel to taxonomic binning, and joint reads assembly. ResultsIn in-silico simulated monomicrobial samples, the recall for ARG detection increased from 51% with TBo to 97.3% with TBwDM; in simulated polymicrobial infections, it increased from 41.8% to 82%. In real sequenced BAL samples (mono and polymicrobial), detected pathogens were also confirmed by traditional culture approaches. Moreover, both recall and precision for ARG detection were higher with TBwDM than with TBo (35 points difference for recall, and 7 points difference for precision). ConclusionsWe present a new bioinformatics pipeline to identify pathogens and ARG in BAL samples from patients with HAP-VAP, with higher sensitivity for ARG recovery than standard approaches and the ability to link ARG to their host pathogens.

bioinformatics↗

From genotype to antibiotic susceptibility phenotype in Enterobacteriaceae: a clinical perspective

Predicting the antibiotic susceptibility phenotype from genomic data is challenging, especially for some specific antibiotics in Enterobacteriaceae. Here we aimed to assess the performance of whole genomic sequencing (WGS) for predicting the antibiotic susceptibility in various Enterobacteriaceae species using the detection of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs), specific mutations and a knowledge-based decision algorithm. We sequenced (Illumina MiSeq 2x250b) 187 clinical isolates from species possessing (n=98) or not (n=89) an intrinsic AmpC-type cephalosporinase. Antibiotic susceptibility was performed by the disc diffusion method. Reads were assembled by A5-miseq and ARGs were identified from the ResFinder database using Diamond. Mutations on GyrA and ParC topoisomerases were studied. We assessed the prediction rates for amoxicillin, co-amoxiclav, piperacillin, piperacillin-tazobactam, ceftazidime, cefepime, meropenem, amikacin, gentamicin and fluoroquinolones. A total of 1,870 isolate/antibiotic combinations were considered. In 295 cases (15.8%) no attempt of prediction was made. Among the 1,575 attempts, 1,537 (97.6%) were correct (1,011 for predicting susceptibility and 526 for predicting resistance), 15 (0.9%) were major errors (MEs) and 23 (1.5%) were very major errors (VMEs). The concordance rates were similar between non-AmpC and AmpC-producing Enterobacteriaceae (907/935 [97.0%] vs 630/640 [98.4%], Chi2 test p=0.07), but more VMEs were observed in non-AmpC producing strains than in those producing an AmpC (20/935 [2.1%] vs 3/640 [0.5%], Chi2 test p=0.007). The majority of VMEs were putatively due to the overexpression of chromosomal genes. In conclusion, the inference of antibiotic susceptibility from genomic data showed good performances for non-AmpC and AmpC-producing Enterobacteriaceae species.

microbiology↗