Biology subjects

Scheaffer, S.

Publications and source records attributed to Scheaffer, S..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2024

Defining a highly conserved B cell epitope in the receptor binding motif of SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein

SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines induce robust and persistent germinal centre (GC) B cell responses in humans. It remains unclear how the continuous evolution of the virus impacts the breadth of the induced GC B cell response. Using ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration, we examined draining lymph nodes of nine healthy adults following bivalent booster immunization. We show that 77.8% of the B cell clones in the GC expressed as representative monoclonal antibodies recognized the spike protein, with a third (37.8%) of these targeting the receptor binding domain (RBD). Strikingly, only one RBD-targeting mAb, mAb-52, neutralized all tested SARS- CoV-2 strains, including the recent KP.2 variant. mAb-52 utilizes the IGHV3-66 public clonotype, protects hamsters challenged against the EG.5.1 variant and targets the class I/II RBD epitope, closely mimicking the binding footprint of ACE2. Finally, we show that the remarkable breadth of mAb-52 is due to the somatic hypermutations accumulated within vaccine-induced GC reaction. One Sentence SummaryBooster SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine recruits and broadens GC B cell responses targeting a highly conserved site on receptor binding domain of spike glycoprotein.

immunology↗

bioRxiv2024

Ipsilateral or contralateral boosting of mice with mRNA vaccines confers equivalent immunity and protection against a SARS-CoV-2 Omicron strain

Boosting with mRNA vaccines encoding variant-matched spike proteins has been implemented to mitigate their reduced efficacy against emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants. Nonetheless, in humans, it remains unclear whether boosting in the ipsilateral or contralateral arm with respect to the priming doses impacts immunity and protection. Here, we boosted K18-hACE2 mice with either monovalent mRNA-1273 (Wuhan-1 spike) or bivalent mRNA-1273.214 (Wuhan-1 + BA.1 spike) vaccine in the ipsilateral or contralateral leg relative to a two-dose priming series with mRNA-1273. Boosting in the ipsilateral or contralateral leg elicited equivalent levels of serum IgG and neutralizing antibody responses against Wuhan-1 and BA.1. While contralateral boosting with mRNA vaccines resulted in expansion of spike-specific B and T cells beyond the ipsilateral draining lymph node (DLN) to the contralateral DLN, administration of a third mRNA vaccine dose at either site resulted in similar levels of antigen-specific germinal center B cells, plasmablasts/plasma cells, T follicular helper cells and CD8+ T cells in the DLNs and the spleen. Furthermore, ipsilateral and contralateral boosting with mRNA-1273 or mRNA-1273.214 vaccines conferred similar homologous or heterologous immune protection against SARS-CoV-2 BA.1 virus challenge with equivalent reductions in viral RNA and infectious virus in the nasal turbinates and lungs. Collectively, our data show limited differences in B and T cell immune responses after ipsilateral and contralateral site boosting by mRNA vaccines that do not substantively impact protection against an Omicron strain. IMPORTANCESequential boosting with mRNA vaccines has been effective strategy to overcome waning immunity and neutralization escape by emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants. However, it remains unclear how the site of boosting relative to the primary vaccination series shapes optimal immune responses or breadth of protection against variants. In K18-hACE2 transgenic mice, we observed that boosting with historical monovalent or variant-matched bivalent vaccines in the ipsilateral or contralateral limb elicited comparable levels of serum spike specific antibody and antigen-specific B and T cells responses. Moreover, boosting on either side conferred equivalent protection against a SARS-CoV-2 Omicron challenge strain. Our data in mice suggest that the site of boosting with an mRNA vaccine does not substantially impact immunity or protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection.

microbiology↗

bioRxiv2023

NVX-CoV2373 ancestral and NVX-CoV2540 BA.5 protein nanoparticle vaccines protect against Omicron BA.5 variant in Syrian hamsters

The emergence of SARS-CoV-2 variants with greater transmissibility or immune evasion properties has jeopardized the existing vaccine and antibody-based countermeasures. Here, we evaluated the efficacy of boosting with the protein nanoparticle NVX-CoV2373 or NVX-CoV2540 vaccines containing ancestral or BA.5 S proteins, respectively, in mRNA-immunized pre-immune hamsters, against challenge with the Omicron BA.5 variant of SARS-CoV-2. Serum antibody binding and neutralization titers were quantified before challenge, and viral loads were measured 3 days after challenge. Compared to an mRNA vaccine boost, NVX-CoV2373 or NVX-CoV2540 induced higher serum antibody binding responses against ancestral Wuhan-1 or BA.5 spike proteins, and greater neutralization of Omicron BA.1 and BA.5 variants. One and three months after vaccine boosting, hamsters were challenged with the Omicron BA.5 variant. NVX-CoV2373 and NVX-CoV2540 boosted hamsters showed reduced viral infection in the nasal washes, nasal turbinates, and lungs compared to unvaccinated animals. Also, NVX-CoV2540 BA.5 boosted animals had fewer breakthrough infections than NVX-CoV2373 or mRNA-vaccinated hamsters. Thus, immunity induced by NVX-CoV2373 or NVX-CoV2540 boosting can protect against the Omicron BA.5 variant in the Syrian hamster model. IMPORTANCEAs SARS-CoV-2 variants continue to emergence, the efficacy of prior and updated COVID-19 vaccines need to be tested. Here, we tested the efficacy of two nanoparticle protein-based vaccines in pre-immune hamsters against a challenge with the BA.5 Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2. Compared to an mRNA vaccine boost, the nanoparticle vaccine NVX-CoV2373 and NVX-CoV2540 induced higher serum antibody binding and neutralization responses against ancestral Wuhan-1 or BA.5 variants. One and three months after the last immunization, hamsters were challenged with the Omicron BA.5 variant. NVX-CoV2373 and NVX-CoV2540 boosted hamsters showed reduced viral infection in the nasal washes, nasal turbinates, and lungs compared to unvaccinated animals. Animals that received the homologous vaccine, NVX-CoV2540, had fewer breakthrough infections than NVX-CoV2373 or mRNA-vaccinated hamsters. Together, our data shows that the BA.5 nanoparticle vaccine is effective and that it is important to update the COVID-19 vaccine to match currently circulating strains of SARS-CoV-2.

microbiology↗

bioRxiv2023

Therapeutic and vaccine-induced cross-reactive antibodies with effector function against emerging Omicron variants

Currently circulating SARS-CoV-2 variants acquired convergent mutations at receptor-binding domain (RBD) hot spots1. Their impact on viral infection, transmission, and efficacy of vaccines and therapeutics remains poorly understood. Here, we demonstrate that recently emerged BQ.1.1. and XBB.1 variants bind ACE2 with high affinity and promote membrane fusion more efficiently than earlier Omicron variants. Structures of the BQ.1.1 and XBB.1 RBDs bound to human ACE2 and S309 Fab (sotrovimab parent) explain the altered ACE2 recognition and preserved antibody binding through conformational selection. We show that sotrovimab binds avidly to all Omicron variants, promotes Fc-dependent effector functions and protects mice challenged with BQ.1.1, the variant displaying the greatest loss of neutralization. Moreover, in several donors vaccine-elicited plasma antibodies cross-react with and trigger effector functions against Omicron variants despite reduced neutralizing activity. Cross-reactive RBD-directed human memory B cells remained dominant even after two exposures to Omicron spikes, underscoring persistent immune imprinting. Our findings suggest that this previously overlooked class of cross-reactive antibodies, exemplified by S309, may contribute to protection against disease caused by emerging variants through elicitation of effector functions.

immunology↗