bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Schaller, M. D.

Publications and source records attributed to Schaller, M. D..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Evaluation of the Utility of a Research Ethics Training Course to Graduate Students

Concerns about the integrity of scientific research and the erosion of public trust in science led to policy recommendations to improve the responsible conduct of research. One recommendation was to increase scientific integrity through training, and numerous funding agencies mandated training in the responsible conduct of research for graduate students and postdoctoral fellows. Many institutions implemented training on consensus recommended topics. This study was initiated to evaluate graduate student perceptions of the utility of training in the responsible conduct of research during their dissertation research. The study was survey-based and captured the responses of first-year doctoral students enrolled in a semester-long course in the responsible conduct of research and past participants in the course. Students enrolled in the course demonstrated a gain in knowledge following training and an increase in self-efficacy in their ability to handle issues in scientific ethics. These students could envision how most of the topics in the course could be beneficial as they progressed in their scientific careers. Past participants in the course were asked to reflect upon their graduate studies and evaluate the impact of training in the responsible conduct of research. Many respondents identified sessions in the course that were useful at this early career stage and lessons learned from the course helped them navigate or avoid ethical challenges in their research. The results demonstrate that students appreciate the value of training in research integrity and that they are applying concepts from their training very early in their careers.

scientific communication and education↗

The Gender Gap Amongst Doctoral Students in the Biomedical Sciences

Historically women have been underrepresented in STEM careers. While the number of women receiving doctorate degrees in the biological sciences has exceeded the number of men since approximately 2005, there is still a disparity between the sexes at more advanced career stages. Achieving equity is an important social goal and there is an expected benefit to science since diverse groups outperform homogeneous groups. There are many factors that contribute to the disparity between men and women in science, including a disparity in research productivity. While many studies have documented this "productivity paradox" and examined factors driving this disparity, few studies have addressed differences in productivity between men and women doctoral students. This is an important population to assess since the individuals are in the formative stages of their academic career and differences in productivity could have a significant impact on career progression. This study addresses this question and identified more than 42,000 doctoral students in the biological and biomedical sciences working with over 16,000 advisors at 235 institutions in the United States and finds a disparity in research productivity between men and women. Men produce >10% more first author papers, >15% more total papers and their first author papers receive >17% more citations. The findings establish the generality of the gender gap in research productivity among doctoral students in the biological and biomedical sciences. Redressing this gap at the formative stage of young scientists careers, when they are establishing their credentials to advance in their field, is important to address the disparity between the sexes in the biomedical workforce.

scientific communication and education↗