bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Schaeffler, L.

Publications and source records attributed to Schaeffler, L..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Spatial, temporal and taxonomic patterns of insect extinction in Germany

Red lists represent an important instrument for evaluating the decline of species in space and time, for improving decisionmaking and for guiding conservation planning. However, globally, only a fraction of species has been categorized according to a red list, even in countries where insects are relatively well-studied. Such large knowledge gaps hinder conservation planning and ultimately jeopardize the maintenance of ecosystem functions. Given the recent reports on severe insect decline, it is now more than ever of great importance to obtain a reliable complete picture of the state of insects. We here derive an estimate of extinction rates and of the proportion of threatened species for the total insect community in Germany, and asses spatial and temporal of extinction patterns. We found a regional extinction rate of 4.5% (1773-1937 species) for the area of Germany. Among extant insect species, 6% are classified as critically endangered (1856-2024 species), while among remaining species, a staggering 36.1% (10758-11086 species) is classified as threatened. Higher trophic levels of zoophagous insects are often more sensitive to negative environmental changes due to their position in the food web, and at the same time are underrepresented in Red Lists. They are therefore disproportionately affected by these knowledge gaps. This concerns particularly parasitoids which are taxa of regulatory importance and often higher extinction risk levels due to their trophic position. Exemplary examination of the spatial scaling of red list categories indicate a far higher rate and risk and exemplary over ten times higher regional extinction rate when the reference area is gradually scaled down. This illustrates the actual situation regarding the magnitude of regional species extinction events and extirpation risks that we have to assume for certain parts of the reference areas. For a given region, the loss of the gene pool of populations specially adapted to a given region usually represents an irreversible biodiversity loss. In order to avoid further irreparable damage, the species threatened with extinction must be preserved with top priority. There is thus a considerable need for research in order to assess the conservation status of more than 56% of the insect species diversity in Germany and to immediately achieve a more balanced trait group representation in red lists.

ecology↗

A universal insect trait tool (ITT, v1.0) for statistical analysis and evaluation of biodiversity research data

We present a unique data set of trait information for 586 insect families in Central Europe, covering the largest known part of described species (over 34,000 species). Life history information and major functional traits were evaluated with fuzzy coding and weighted according to the number of known species in Germany. An overall analysis of the German insect fauna is given and the data set is exemplarily applied to metabarcoding results of malaise trap samples. Due to the high functional and taxonomic diversity in insects, further developments and refinements of traits to be included will be an ongoing process with advancements of upcoming database versions to be subsequently published.

ecology↗

Recommendations for tissue homogenisation and extraction in DNA metabarcoding of Malaise trap samples

With increased application of DNA metabarcoding in fast and high-resolution biodiversity assessment, various laboratory protocols have been optimised in recent years and their further evaluation is subject of current research. Homogenisation of bulk samples and subsequent DNA extraction from destructed tissue is one way of starting the metabarcoding process. This essential step in the protocol can either be conducted from wet sample material (e.g. bulk insect samples) soaked in fixative or from completely dried individuals. While the latter method appears to produce more consistent results, it is time consuming and more prone to cross-contamination. We tested both homogenisation approaches with regard to time efficiency and biodiversity assessment of complex arthropod bulk samples, in particular how the amount of processed tissue affects taxon recovery. Both approaches reveal similar taxa compositions and detect a similar total OTU diversity in a single extraction reaction. Increased amounts of tissue used in DNA extraction improved OTU diversity detection and recovered particularly specific low-biomass taxa, making this approach valuable for samples with high biomass and/or diversity. Due to less handling time and lower vulnerability for cross-contamination we recommend the processing of wet material when sample homogenisation is applied.

molecular biology↗