bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Sapede, E.

Publications and source records attributed to Sapede, E..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Mutations and structural variants arising during double-strand break repair

Double-strand break (DSB) repair is highly mutagenic compared to normal replication. In budding yeast, repair of an HO endonuclease-induced DSB at MAT can be repaired by using a transcriptionally silent HMR::Kl-URA3 donor. During repair, -1 deletions in homonucleotide runs are strongly favored over +1 insertions, whereas during replication, spontaneous +1 and -1 events are equal. Microhomology-bounded, repair-associated intragenic deletions (IDs) are recovered 12 times more frequently than tandem duplications (TDs). IDs have a mean length of 56 bp, while TDs average 22 bp. These data suggest a picture of the structure of the repair replication fork: IDs and TDs occur within the open structure of a migrating D-loop, where the 3 end of a partly copied new DNA strand can dissociate and anneal with a single-stranded region of microhomology that lies either [~]80 bp ahead or [~]40 bp behind the 3 end. Another major class of repair-associated mutations ([~]10%) are interchromosomal template switches (ICTS), even though the K. lactis URA3 sequence in HMR is only 72% identical (homeologous) with S. cerevisiae ura3-52. ICTS events begin and end at regions of short ([~]7 bp) microhomology; however, ICTS events are constrained to the middle of the copied sequence. Whereas microhomology usage in intragenic deletions is not influenced by adjacent homeology, we show that extensive pairing of adjacent homeology plays a critical role in ICTS. Thus, although by convention, structural variants are characterized by the precise base pairs at their junction, microhomology-mediated template switching actually requires alignment of extensive adjacent homeology. Significance statementDNA synthesis during repair of a double-strand chromosome break by homologous recombination exhibits a high rate of mutation compared to normal replication. Using a genetic system in budding yeast, we isolated thousands of mutations occurring during repair. We conclude that the repair replication fork appears to have the two DNA strands open [~]80 bp ahead of the DNA polymerase, but the strands re-anneal rapidly behind the polymerase. Additionally, we analyzed interchromosomal template switching, in which the partially copied DNA strand dissociates and pairs with a new template at a short stretch of perfectly matching bases (microhomology), and resumes copying. We show that these apparent microhomology-mediated template switching events in fact require the pairing of [~]200 bp of imperfectly matching bases (homeology).

genetics↗

Nonhomologous tails direct heteroduplex rejection and mismatch correction during single-strand annealing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Single-strand annealing (SSA) is initiated when a double strand break (DSB) occurs between two flanking repeated sequences, resulting in a deletion that leaves a single copy of the repeat. We studied budding yeast strains carrying two 200-bp URA3 sequences separated by 2.3-kb of phage lambda DNA in which a site-specific DSB can be created by HO or Cas9 endonucleases. Repeat-mediated deletion requires removal of long 3-ended single-stranded tails (flaps) by Rad1-Rad10 with the assistance of Msh2-Msh3 and Slx4. A natural 3% divergence between repeats (designated F and A) causes a significant reduction in the frequency of SSA repair. This decrease is caused by heteroduplex rejection in which mismatches (MMs) in the annealed intermediate are recognized by the MutS (Msh2 and Msh6) components of the MM repair (MMR) pathway coupled to unwinding of the duplex by the Sgs1-Rmi1-Top3 helicase. MutL homologs, Mlh1-Pms1 (MutL) are not required for rejection but play their expected role in mismatch correction. Remarkably, heteroduplex rejection is very low in strains where the identical repeats were immediately adjacent (Tailless strains) and the DSB was induced by Cas9. These results suggest that the presence of nonhomologous tails strongly stimulates heteroduplex rejection in SSA. DNA sequencing analysis of SSA products from the FA Tailed strain, where the F variant carries six single-base mutations and one +1(T) insertion within a run of 10 Ts showed a gradient of correction favoring the sequence opposite each 3 end of the annealed strand. Mismatches (MMs) located in the center of the repair intermediate were corrected by Msh2-Msh6 mediated mismatch correction, while correction of MMs at the extremity of the SSA intermediate often appears to use a different mechanism, using either 3 nonhomologous tail removal or 3 to 5 "proofreading" resection by DNA polymerase {delta} followed by synthesis to fill in the gap. In contrast, in FA Tailless strains there was a uniform repair of the MMs across the repeat, with a bias in favor of the "left" copy. A distinctive pattern of correction was found in the absence of MSH2, in both Tailed and Tailless strains, while the deletion of MSH6 resulted in unrepaired MMs.

genetics↗