bioRxiv ScienceSearch

Biology subjects

Santani, A. B.

Publications and source records attributed to Santani, A. B..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Rapid interpretation of clinical exomes using Phenoxome: a computational phenotype-driven approach

Clinical exome sequencing (CES) has become the preferred diagnostic platform for complex pediatric disorders with suspected monogenic etiologies, solving up to 20%-50% of cases depending on indication. Despite rapid advancements in CES analysis, the major challenge still resides in identifying the casual variants among the thousands of variants detected during CES testing, and thus establishing a molecular diagnosis. To improve the clinical exome diagnostic efficiency, we developed Phenoxome, a robust phenotype-driven model that adopts a network-based approach to facilitate automated variant prioritization and subsequent classification. Phenoxome dissects the phenotypic manifestation of a patient in conjunction with their genomic profile to filter and then prioritize putative pathogenic variants. To validate our method, we have compiled a clinical cohort of 105 positive patient samples (i.e. at least one reported pathogenic variant) that represent a wide range of genetic heterogeneity from The Childrens Hospital of Philadelphia. Our approach identifies the causative variants within the top 5, 10, or 25 candidates in more than 50%, 71%, or 88% of these patient samples respectively. Furthermore, we show that our method is optimized for clinical testing by yielding superior ranking of the pathogenic variants compared to current state-of-art methods. The web application of Phenoxome is available to the public at http://phenoxome.chop.edu/.

bioinformatics

Evaluating the clinical validity of gene-disease associations: an evidence-based framework developed by the Clinical Genome Resource

With advances in genomic sequencing technology, the number of reported gene-disease relationships has rapidly expanded. However, the evidence supporting these claims varies widely, confounding accurate evaluation of genomic variation in a clinical setting. Despite the critical need to differentiate clinically valid relationships from less well-substantiated relationships, standard guidelines for such evaluation do not currently exist. The NIH-funded Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) has developed a framework to define and evaluate the clinical validity of gene-disease pairs across a variety of Mendelian disorders. In this manuscript we describe a proposed framework to evaluate relevant genetic and experimental evidence supporting or contradicting a gene-disease relationship, and the subsequent validation of this framework using a set of representative gene-disease pairs. The framework provides a semi-quantitative measurement for the strength of evidence of a gene-disease relationship which correlates to a qualitative classification: \"Definitive\", \"Strong\", \"Moderate\", \"Limited\", \"No Reported Evidence\" or \"Conflicting Evidence.\" Within the ClinGen structure, classifications derived using this framework are reviewed and confirmed or adjusted based on clinical expertise of appropriate disease experts. Detailed guidance for utilizing this framework and access to the curation interface is available on our website. This evidence-based, systematic method to assess the strength of gene-disease relationships will facilitate more knowledgeable utilization of genomic variants in clinical and research settings.

genetics