Biology subjects

Sandy, J.

Publications and source records attributed to Sandy, J..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2018

Cleft lip/palate and educational attainment: cause, consequence, or correlation? A Mendelian randomization study

ImportancePrevious studies have found that children born with a non-syndromic form of cleft lip and/or palate have lower-than-average educational attainment. These differences could be due to a genetic predisposition to low intelligence and academic performance, factors arising due to the cleft phenotype (such as school absence, social stigmatization and impaired speech and language development), or confounding by the prenatal environment. A clearer understanding of this mechanism will inform development of interventions to improve educational attainment in individuals born with a cleft, which could have wide-ranging knock-on effects on their quality of life.\n\nObjectiveTo assess evidence for the hypothesis that common variant genetic liability to non-syndromic cleft lip with or without cleft palate (nsCL/P) influences educational attainment.\n\nDesignUsing summary data from genome-wide association studies (GWAS), we performed Linkage Disequilibrium (LD)-score regression and two-sample Mendelian randomization to evaluate the relationship between genetic liability to nsCL/P (GWAS n=3,987) and educational attainment (GWAS n=766,345), and intelligence (GWAS n=257,828).\n\nResultsThere was little evidence for shared genetic aetiology between nsCL/P and educational attainment (rg -0.03, 95% CI -0.14 to 0.08, P 0.58; {beta}MR 0.002, 95% CI -0.001 to 0.005, P 0.417) or intelligence (rg -0.01, 95% CI -0.12 to 0.10, P 0.85; {beta}MR 0.002, 95% CI -0.010 to 0.014, P 0.669).\n\nConclusions and relevanceCommon genetic variants are unlikely to predispose individuals born with nsCL/P to low educational attainment or intelligence. This information will help tailor clinical-, school-, social- and family-level interventions to improve educational attainment in this group.\n\nKey PointsO_ST_ABSQuestionC_ST_ABSDo children born with a non-syndromic cleft lip with or without palate (nsCL/P) have lower-than average academic achievement because of an underlying genetic predisposition to educational attainment and/or intelligence?\n\nFindingsThere was little evidence for shared common variant genetic correlation between nsCL/P, educational attainment and intelligence.\n\nMeaningCommon genetic variants are unlikely to predispose individuals born with nsCL/P to low educational attainment or intelligence. This information will help tailor clinical-, school-, social- and family-level interventions to improve educational attainment in this group.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2018

DNA methylation mediates genetic liability to non-syndromic cleft lip/palate

BackgroundNon-syndromic cleft lip/palate (nsCL/P) is a complex trait with genetic and environmental risk factors. Around 40 distinct genetic risk loci have been identified for nsCL/P, but many reside in non-protein-coding regions with an unclear function. We hypothesised that one possibility is that the genetic risk variants influence susceptibility to nsCL/P through gene regulation pathways, such as those involving DNA methylation.\n\nMethodsUsing nsCL/P Genome-wide association study summary data and methylation data from four studies, we used Mendelian randomization and joint likelihood mapping to identify putative loci where genetic liability to nsCL/P may be mediated by variation in DNA methylation in blood.\n\nResultsThere was evidence at three independent loci, VAX1 (10q25.3), LOC146880 (17q23.3) and NTN1 (17p13.1), that liability to nsCL/P and variation in DNA methylation might be driven by the same genetic variant. Follow up analyses using DNA methylation data, derived from lip and palate tissue, and gene expression catalogues provided further insight into possible biological mechanisms.\n\nConclusionsGenetic variation may increase liability to nsCL/P by influencing DNA methylation and gene expression at VAX1, LOC146880 and NTN1.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2018

Investigating the shared genetics of non-syndromic cleft lip/palate and facial morphology

There is increasing evidence that genetic risk variants for non-syndromic cleft lip/palate (nsCL/P) are also associated with normal-range variation in facial morphology. However, previous analyses are mostly limited to candidate SNPs and findings have not been consistently replicated. Here, we used polygenic risk scores (PRS) to test for genetic overlap between nsCL/P and seven biologically relevant facial phenotypes. Where evidence was found of genetic overlap, we used bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) to test the hypothesis that genetic liability to nsCL/P is causally related to implicated facial phenotypes. Across 5,804 individuals of European ancestry from two studies, we found strong evidence, using PRS, of genetic overlap between nsCL/P and philtrum width; a 1 S.D. increase in nsCL/P PRS was associated with a 0.10 mm decrease in philtrum width (95% C.I. 0.054, 0.146; P = 0.00002). Follow-up MR analyses supported a causal relationship; genetic variants for nsCL/P homogeneously cause decreased philtrum width. In addition to the primary analysis, we also identified two novel risk loci for philtrum width at 5q22.2 and 7p15.2 in our Genome-wide Association Study (GWAS) of 6,136 individuals. Our results support a liability threshold model of inheritance for nsCL/P, related to abnormalities in development of the philtrum.

genetics↗

bioRxiv2017

Distinct Blood DNA Methylation Profiles In Subtypes Of Orofacial Cleft

BackgroundThere is evidence that different subtypes of orofacial cleft have distinct aetiologies, although the precise molecular mechanisms underlying these are unknown. Given the key role of epigenetic processes such as DNA methylation in embryonic development, it is likely that aberrant DNA methylation may also play a part in the development of orofacial clefts.\n\nMethodsIn this study, we explored whether blood samples from children with different cleft subtypes showed distinct DNA methylation profiles.\n\nIn whole blood samples from 150 children from the Cleft Collective cohort study, we measured DNA methylation at over 450,000 sites on the genome. We then carried out epigenome-wide association studies (EWAS) to test the association between methylation at each site and cleft subtype (cleft lip only CLO n=50; cleft palate only CPO n=50; cleft lip and palate CLP n=50).\n\nResultsWe found four genomic regions differentially methylated in CLO compared to CLP, 17 in CPO compared to CLP and 294 in CPO compared to CLO. These regions included several mapping to genes that have previously been implicated in the development of orofacial clefts (for example, TBX1, COL11A2, HOXA2, PDGFRA) and over 250 novel associations.\n\nConclusionOur finding of distinct methylation profiles in different cleft subtypes might reflect differences in their aetiologies, with DNA methylation either playing a causal role in development of OFC subtypes or reflecting causal genetic or environmental factors.

epidemiology↗