Biology subjects

Sands, B. E.

Publications and source records attributed to Sands, B. E..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2022

Anti-integrin αvβ6 autoantibodies are a novel predictive biomarker in ulcerative colitis

Background and AimsBetter biomarkers for prediction of ulcerative colitis (UC) development and prognostication are needed. Anti-integrin v{beta}6 autoantibodies (anti-v{beta}6) have been described in UC patients. Here, we tested for the presence of anti-v{beta}6 antibodies in the pre-clinical phase of UC and studied their association with disease-related outcomes after diagnosis. MethodsAnti-v{beta}6 were measured in 4 longitudinal serum samples collected from 82 subjects who later developed UC and 82 matched controls from a Department of Defense pre-clinical cohort (PREDICTS). In a distinct, external validation cohort (GEM), we tested 12 pre-UC subjects and 49 matched controls. Further, anti-v{beta}6 were measured in 2 incident UC cohorts (COMPASS n=55 and OSCCAR n=104) and associations between anti-v{beta}6 and UC-related outcomes were defined using Cox proportional-hazards model. ResultsAnti-v{beta}6 were significantly higher among individuals who developed UC compared to controls up to 10 years before diagnosis in PREDICTS. The anti-v{beta}6 seropositivity was 12.2% 10 years before diagnosis and increased to 52.4% at the time of diagnosis in subjects who developed UC compared with 2.7% in controls across the 4 timepoints. Anti-v{beta}6 predicted UC development with an AUC of at least 0.8 up to 10 years before diagnosis. The presence of anti-v{beta}6 in pre-clinical UC samples was validated in the GEM cohort. Finally, high anti-v{beta}6 was associated with a composite of adverse UC-outcomes including hospitalization, disease extension, colectomy, systemic steroid use and/or escalation to biologic therapy in recently diagnosed UC. ConclusionAnti-integrin v{beta}6 auto-antibodies precede the clinical diagnosis of UC by up to 10 years and are associated with adverse UC-related outcomes.

immunology↗

bioRxiv2020

Intestinal inflammation modulates the expression of ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and potentially overlaps with the pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 related disease

The presence of gastrointestinal symptoms and high levels of viral RNA in the stool suggest active Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) replication within enterocytes. Here, in multiple, large cohorts of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), we have studied the intersections between Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), intestinal inflammation and IBD treatment. A striking expression of ACE2 on the small bowel enterocyte brush border supports intestinal infectivity by SARS-CoV-2. Commonly used IBD medications, both biologic and non-biologic, do not significantly impact ACE2 and TMPRSS2 receptor expression in the uninflamed intestines. Additionally, we have defined molecular responses to COVID-19 infection that are also enriched in IBD, pointing to shared molecular networks between COVID-19 and IBD. These data generate a novel appreciation of the confluence of COVID-19- and IBD-associated inflammation and provide mechanistic insights supporting further investigation of specific IBD drugs in the treatment of COVID-19.

immunology↗

bioRxiv2018

Inflammatory bowel disease microbiotas alter gut CD4 T-cell homeostasis and drive colitis in mice

To examine the functional contribution of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) microbes to immune homeostasis and colitis, we colonized unchallenged and colitis-susceptible germ-free mice with over twenty human intestinal microbiotas from healthy and IBD donors. Compared to healthy microbiotas, IBD microbiotas led to expanded ROR{gamma}t+Th17 cells and reduced ROR{gamma}t+Treg in the gut of unchallenged gnotobiotic mice and increased disease severity in colitis-susceptible mice. The proportions of ROR{gamma}t+Th17 and ROR{gamma}t+Treg induced by each microbiota were highly predictive of the human disease status and strongly correlated with disease severity in colitis-susceptible mice colonized with the same human microbiotas. The transmittable functional potential of IBD microbes suggests a mechanism for a microbial contribution to IBD pathogenesis and a potential route for its treatment and prevention.

immunology↗

bioRxiv2018

Microbial Engraftment and Efficacy of Fecal Microbiota Transplant for Clostridium difficile Patients With and Without IBD

Background & AimsRecurrent and refractory Clostridium difficile infections (CDI) are effectively treated with fecal microbiota transplant (FMT). Uncertainty exists regarding the effectiveness of FMT for CDI with underlying inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), its effects on disease activity and its effectiveness transferring the donor microbiome to patients with and without IBD. This study aims to determine FMTs effectiveness in subjects with and without IBD, its impact on IBD activity, the level of microbiome engraftment, and predictors of CDI recurrence.\n\nMethodsSubjects with and without IBD who underwent FMT for recurrent or refractory CDI between 2013 and 2016 at The Mount Sinai Hospital were followed for up to 6 months. The primary outcome was CDI recurrence 6 months after FMT. Secondary outcomes were (1) CDI recurrence 2 months after FMT; (2) Frequency of IBD flare after FMT; (3) Microbiome engraftment after FMT; (4) Predictors of CDI recurrence.\n\nResultsOverall, 134 patients, 46 with IBD, were treated with FMT. There was no difference in recurrence in patients with and without IBD at 2 months (22.5% vs 17.9%; p=0.63) and 6 months (38.7% vs 36.5%; p>0.99). Proton pump inhibitor use, severe CDI, and comorbid conditions were predictors of recurrence. The pre-FMT microbiome was not predictive of CDI recurrence. Subjects with active disease requiring medication escalation had reduced engraftment. There was no difference in engraftment based on IBD endoscopic severity at FMT.\n\nConclusionsIBD did not affect CDI recurrence rates 6 months after FMT. Pre-FMT microbiome was not predictive of recurrence, and microbial engraftment was dependent on IBD treatment escalation but not on underlying disease severity.

microbiology↗