bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Sandra Hoffberg

Publications and source records attributed to Sandra Hoffberg.

2 recordsLinked to original sources
bioRxiv2016

Adapterama I: Universal stubs and primers for thousands of dual-indexed Illumina libraries (iTru & iNext)

Next-generation DNA sequencing (NGS) offers many benefits, but major factors limiting NGS include reducing costs of: 1) start-up (i.e., doing NGS for the first time); 2) buy-in (i.e., getting the smallest possible amount of data from a run); and 3) sample preparation. Reducing sample preparation costs is commonly addressed, but start-up and buy-in costs are rarely addressed. We present dual-indexing systems to address all three of these issues. By breaking the library construction process into universal, re-usable, combinatorial components, we reduce all costs, while increasing the number of samples and the variety of library types that can be combined within runs. We accomplish this by extending the Illumina TruSeq dual-indexing approach to 768 (384 + 384) indexed primers that produce 384 unique dual-indexes or 147,456 (384 x 384) unique combinations. We maintain eight nucleotide indexes, with many that are compatible with Illumina index sequences. We synthesized these indexing primers, purifying them with only standard desalting and placing small aliquots in replicate plates. In qPCR validation tests, 206 of 208 primers tested passed (99% success). We then created hundreds of libraries in various scenarios. Our approach reduces start-up and per-sample costs by requiring only one universal adapter that works with indexed PCR primers to uniquely identify samples. Our approach reduces buy-in costs because: 1) relatively few oligonucleotides are needed to produce a large number of indexed libraries; and 2) the large number of possible primers allows researchers to use unique primer sets for different projects, which facilitates pooling of samples during sequencing. Our libraries make use of standard Illumina sequencing primers and index sequence length and are demultiplexed with standard Illumina software, thereby minimizing customization headaches. In subsequent Adapterama papers, we use these same primers with different adapter stubs to construct amplicon and restriction-site associated DNA libraries, but their use can be expanded to any type of library sequenced on Illumina platforms.

Genomics↗
bioRxiv2016

Adapterama IV: Sequence Capture of Dual-digest RADseq Libraries with Identifiable Duplicates (RADcap)

Molecular ecologists seek to genotype hundreds to thousands of loci from hundreds to thousands of individuals at minimal cost per sample. Current methods such as restriction site associated DNA sequencing (RADseq) and sequence capture are constrained by costs associated with inefficient use of sequencing data and sample preparation, respectively. Here, we demonstrate RADcap, an approach that combines the major benefits of RADseq (low cost with specific start positions) with those of sequence capture (repeatable sequencing of specific loci) to significantly increase efficiency and reduce costs relative to current approaches. The RADcap approach uses a new version of dual-digest RADseq (3RAD) to identify candidate SNP loci for capture bait design, and subsequently uses custom sequence capture baits to consistently enrich candidate SNP loci across many individuals. We combined this approach with a new library preparation method for identifying and removing PCR duplicates from 3RAD libraries, which allows researchers to process RADseq data using traditional pipelines, and we tested the RADcap method by genotyping sets of 96 to 384 Wisteria plants. Our results demonstrate that our RADcap method: 1) can methodologically reduce (to <5%) and computationally remove PCR duplicate reads from data; (2) achieves 80-90% reads-on-target in 11 of 12 enrichments; (3) returns consistent coverage ([&ge;]4x) across >90% of individuals at up to 99.9% of the targeted loci; (4) produces consistently high occupancy matrices of genotypes across hundreds of individuals; and (5) is inexpensive, with reagent and sequencing costs totaling <$6/sample and adapter and primer costs of only a few hundred dollars.

Genetics↗