bioRxiv ScienceSearch

Biology subjects

Sanderson-Cimino, M.

Publications and source records attributed to Sanderson-Cimino, M..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Semantic Fluency Predicts Six-Year Progression to Mild Cognitive Impairment in Middle-Aged Men

ObjectiveTest the hypothesis that individual differences in episodic memory and verbal fluency in cognitively normal middle-aged adults will predict progression to amnestic MCI after 6 years.\n\nMethodThe analysis sample included 842 male twins who were cognitively normal at baseline (M=56 years), completed measures of episodic memory and verbal fluency at baseline and again 6 years later (M=62 years).\n\nResultsPoor episodic memory predicted progression to both amnestic MCI (OR=4.42, 95% CI [2.44, 10.60]) and non-amnestic MCI (OR=1.92, 95% CI [1.32, 3.44]). Poor semantic verbal fluency also independently predicted progression to amnestic MCI (OR=1.86, 95% CI [1.12, 3.52]). In the full sample, a semantic-specific fluency latent variable at wave 1 (which controls for letter fluency) predicted change in episodic memory at wave 2 ({beta}=.13), but not vice-versa ({beta}=.04). Associations between episodic memory and verbal fluency factors were primarily explained by genetic, rather than environmental, correlations.\n\nConclusionsAmong individuals who were cognitively normal at wave 1, episodic memory moderately-to-strongly predicted progression to MCI at average age 62, emphasizing the fact that there is still meaningful variability even among cognitively normal individuals. Episodic memory, which is typically a primary focus for AD risk, declined earlier and more quickly than fluency. However, semantic fluency at average age 56 predicted 6-year change in memory as well as progression to amnestic MCI even after accounting for baseline memory performance. These findings emphasize the utility of memory and fluency measures in early identification of AD risk.

genetics

Multiple memory tests in midlife improve prediction of mild cognitive impairment

INTRODUCTIONPredicting risk for Alzheimers disease when most people are likely still biomarker negative would aid earlier identification. We hypothesized that combining multiple memory tests and scores in middle-aged adults would provide useful, and non-invasive, prediction of 6-year progression to MCI.\n\nMETHODSWe examined 849 men who were cognitively normal at baseline (mean age=55.69{+/-}2.45).\n\nRESULTSCalifornia Verbal Learning Test learning trials was the best individual predictor of amnestic MCI (OR=4.75). A latent factor incorporating 7 measures across 3 memory tests provided much stronger prediction (OR=9.88). This compared favorably with biomarker-based prediction in a study of much older adults.\n\nDISCUSSIONNeuropsychological tests are sensitive and early indicators of Alzheimers disease risk at an age when few individuals are likely to have yet become biomarker positive. Single best measures may appear time- and cost-effective, but 30 additional minutes of testing, and use of multiple scores within tests, provides substantially improved prediction

pathology