bioRxiv ScienceSearch

Biology subjects

Sander, E. A.

Publications and source records attributed to Sander, E. A..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Substrate deformations induce directed keratinocyte migration

Cell migration is an essential part of many (patho)physiological processes in the body, including keratinocyte re-epithelialization of healing wounds. Recent interest in the mechanobiology of tissues suggests that physical forces and mechanical cues from the wound bed (in addition to biochemical signals) may also play an important role in the healing process. Previously, we explored this possibility and found that polyacrylamide (PA) gel stiffness affected primary human keratinocyte behavior and that mechanical deformations in soft (~1.2 kPA) PA gels produced by neighboring cells appeared to influence the process of de novo epithelial sheet formation. In order to clearly demonstrate that keratinocytes do respond to such deformations, we conducted a series of experiments where we observed the response of single keratinocytes to a prescribed local substrate deformation that mimicked a neighboring cell or evolving multicellular aggregate via a servo-controlled microneedle. We also examined the effect of adding either Y27632, a rho kinase inhibitor, or blebbistatin, a non-muscle myosin II inhibitor, on the response of the cells to PA gel deformations. The results of this study indicate that keratinocytes do sense and respond to mechanical signals comparable to those that originate from substrate displacements imposed by neighboring cells, a finding that could have important implications for the process of keratinocyte re-epithelialization that takes place during normal and pathologic wound healing. Furthermore, the Rho/ROCK pathway and the engagement of NM II are both essential to the observed process of substrate deformation-directed keratinocyte migration.

biophysics

Collective cell behaviour in mechanosensing of substrate thickness

Extracellular matrix stiffness has a profound effect on the behaviour of many cell types. Adherent cells apply contractile forces to the material on which they adhere, and sense the resistance of the material to deformation - its stiffness. This is dependent on both the elastic modulus and the thickness of the material, with the corollary that single cells are able to sense underlying stiff materials through soft hydrogel materials at low (<10 {micro}m) thicknesses. Here, we hypothesised that cohesive colonies of cells exert more force and create more hydrogel deformation than single cells, therefore enabling them to mechanosense more deeply into underlying materials than single cells. To test this, we modulated the thickness of soft (1 kPa) elastic ECM-functionalised polyacrylamide hydrogels adhered to glass substrates and allowed colonies of MG63 cells to form on their surfaces. Cell morphology and deformations of fluorescent fiducial-marker labelled hydrogels were quantified by time-lapse fluorescence microscopy imaging. Single cell spreading increased with respect to decreasing hydrogel thickness, with data fitting to an exponential model with half-maximal response at a thickness of 3.2 m. By quantifying cell area within colonies of defined area, we similarly found that colony-cell spreading increased with decreasing hydrogel thickness but with a greater halfmaximal response at 54 m. Depth-sensing was dependent on ROCK-mediated cellular contractility. Surface hydrogel deformations were significantly greater on thick hydrogels compared to thin hydrogels. In addition, deformations extended greater distances from the periphery of colonies on thick hydrogels compared to thin hydrogels. Our data suggest that by acting collectively, cells mechanosense rigid materials beneath elastic hydrogels at greater depths than individual cells. This raises the possibility that the collective action of cells in colonies or sheets may allow cells to sense structures of differing material properties at comparatively large distances.

biophysics