bioRxiv ScienceSearch

Biology subjects

Sammons, M. A.

Publications and source records attributed to Sammons, M. A..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Comparison of genotoxic vs. non-genotoxic stabilization of p53 provides insight into parallel stress-responsive transcriptional networks

The tumor suppressor protein p53 is activated in response to diverse intrinsic and extrinsic cellular stresses and controls a broad cell-protective gene network. Whether p53:DNA binding and subsequent transcriptional activation differs downstream of these diverse intrinsic and extrinsic activators within the same cell type is controversial. Using primary human fibroblasts, we assessed the genome-wide profile of p53 binding, chromatin structure, and transcriptional dynamics after either genotoxic or non-genotoxic activation of p53. Activation of p53 by treatment with either etoposide or the small molecule MDM2 inhibitor nutlin 3A yields strikingly similar genome-wide binding of p53 and concomitant changes to local chromatin modifications and structure. DNA damage, but not p53 activation per se, leads to increased expression of genes in an inflammatory cytokine pathway. Etoposide-mediated activation of this inflammation signature is inhibited by treatment with the NF-kB pathway inhibitor Bay 11-7082, but does not affect expression of canonical p53 target genes. Our data demonstrate that differential activation of p53 within the same cell type leads to highly similar genome-wide binding, chromatin dynamics, and gene expression dynamics, and that DNA damage-mediated signaling through NF-{kappa}B likely controls the observed pro-inflammatory cytokine gene expression pattern.

genomics

Cell type-dependent control of p53 transcription and enhancer activity by p63

Transcriptional activation by p53 provides powerful, organism-wide tumor suppression. In this work, we demonstrate that the p53-induced transcriptome varies based on cell type, reflects cell type-specific activities, and is considerably more broad than previously anticipated. This behavior is strongly influenced by p53 engagement with differentially active cell type-specific enhancers and promoters. In epithelial cell types, p53 activity is dependent on the p53 family member p63, which displays widespread enhancer binding. Notably, we demonstrate that p63 is required for epithelial enhancer identity including enhancers used by p53 during stress-dependent signaling. Loss of p63, but not p53, leads to site-specific depletion of enhancer-associated chromatin modifications, suggesting that p63 functions as an enhancer maintenance factor in epithelial cells. Additionally, a subset of epithelial-specific enhancers is dependent on the activity of p63 providing a direct link between lineage determination and enhancer structure. These data suggest a broad, cell-intrinsic mechanism for regulating the p53-dependent cellular response to stress through differential regulation of cis-regulatory elements.

genomics

The transcription factor Tfap2e/AP-2ε plays a pivotal role in maintaining the identity of basal vomeronasal sensory neurons

The identity of individual neuronal cell types is defined by the expression of specific combinations of transcriptional regulators that control cell type-specific genetic programs. The epithelium of the vomeronasal organ of mice contains two major types of vomeronasal sensory neurons (VSNs): 1) the apical VSNs which express vomeronasal 1 receptors (V1r) and the G-protein subunit Gi2 and; 2) the basal VSNs which express vomeronasal 2 receptors (V2r) and the G-protein subunit Gao. Both cell types originate from a common pool of progenitors and eventually acquire apical or basal identity through largely unknown mechanisms.\n\nThe transcription factor AP-2{varepsilon}, encoded by the Tfap2e gene, plays a role in controlling the development of GABAergic interneurons in the main and accessory olfactory bulb (AOB), moreover AP-2{varepsilon} has been previously described to be expressed in the VSNs. Here we show that AP-2{varepsilon} is expressed in postmitotic VSNs after they commit to the basal differentiation program. Loss of AP-2{varepsilon} function resulted in reduced number of basal VSNs and in an increased number of neurons expressing markers of the apical lineage. Our work suggests that AP-2{varepsilon}, which is expressed in late phases of differentiation, is not needed to initiate the apical-basal differentiation dichotomy but for maintaining the basal VSNs identity by preventing the expression of apical genes. Moreover, our data suggest that differentiated VSNs of mice retain a notable level of plasticity.\n\nHighlightsO_LIThe VNO contains two major cell types that are segregated in apical and basal regions of the VNO\nC_LIO_LIAP-2{varepsilon} is expressed in postmitotic basal vomeronasal sensory neurons.\nC_LIO_LIAP-2{varepsilon} is essential to maintain the identity of basal vomeronasal sensory neurons.\nC_LI

developmental biology