bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Sales, N. G.

Publications and source records attributed to Sales, N. G..

10 recordsLinked to original sources

Environmental DNA/RNA metabarcoding in estuaries of Sao Paulo, Brazil, reveals fish diversity and the presence of invasive species

Tropical estuaries within the Brazilian Atlantic Forest are biodiversity hotspots facing escalating anthropogenic pressures, yet their ichthyofaunal assemblages remain incompletely documented. We evaluated the combined use of environmental DNA (eDNA) and environmental RNA (eRNA) metabarcoding to characterize fish communities in two estuaries with contrasting levels of urbanization (the Juqueriquere and Escuro rivers) on the northern coast of Sao Paulo, Brazil. Targeting the mitochondrial 12S rRNA (MiFish) fragment, we detected a diverse vertebrate assemblage totaling 93 species. eDNA identified 32 fish species across both systems, while eRNA detected 22 species in the preserved estuary, providing robust signals of metabolically active assemblages. The less impacted estuary exhibited significantly higher diversity indices and a more heterogeneous taxonomic composition. In contrast, the urbanized system displayed clear molecular signatures of anthropogenic influence, including the presence of invasive species (Oreochromis niloticus, O. aureus, and Clarias gariepinus) and domestic animals. This study constitutes the first application of fish eRNA metabarcoding in Brazil and demonstrates that integrating eDNA and eRNA refines ecological interpretation by coupling biodiversity detection with improved inference about contemporary community composition. Our findings highlight the potential of multi-molecule metabarcoding for routine, non-invasive biodiversity assessment in megadiverse and conservation-priority coastal ecosystems.

ecology↗

Multi-seasonal eDNA metabarcoding highlights a resurgence in fish diversity across a severely impacted estuarine ecosystem

Aquatic ecosystems have been in an alarming state of decline for decades. Therefore, there is an urgent need for more accessible and rapid monitoring methods that will ultimately allow for restoration programmes to be implemented. In this study, we deployed environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding as a fish monitoring tool in the Mersey estuarine system (UK), where ecosystem productivity has been severely impacted by water quality degradation since the Industrial Revolution. Monthly water samples were collected over a year (2023-2024) throughout the estuary, covering saline, brackish and freshwater zones. Overall, 69 species of fish were detected, increasing the number of known species within the estuary in comparison to both historical and contemporary records (46 and 39, respectively), with a generally higher observed richness within the upper estuary sampled zones where the water chemistry is predominantly freshwater. Notably, we identified several species returning to the system for the first time since pre-industrial times. Peak species richness was recorded during the winter season (December-February). Species compositions varied significantly by month and spatially by zone within months, but not when grouped seasonally. Furthermore, around [~]15% of the species detected were diadromous, with the endangered Atlantic salmon Salmo salar, for example, being frequently detected during its key migratory period. This study highlights the resurgence in fish diversity in a once biologically depleted estuarine ecosystem and demonstrates how eDNA metabarcoding can be implemented for detecting historically absent species, thereby enhancing restoration monitoring efforts globally.

ecology↗

Performance of eDNA capture methods for monitoring fish biodiversity in a hyper-tidal estuary

Environmental DNA (eDNA) has become an established and efficient method for monitoring biodiversity in aquatic systems. However, there is a need to compare and standardise sampling methods across ecosystem types, particularly complex ecosystems such as estuaries where unique challenges for monitoring fish populations are present due to fluctuating environmental factors. Here, we compare fish biodiversity metrics obtained from eDNA metabarcoding data using four different eDNA filtering methods: three manual filtering methods with different pore sizes (0.45, 1.2 and 5 {micro}m) and a newly established passive method, the metaprobe. The study was applied across a salinity gradient in a hyper-tidal estuarine ecosystem. Overall, 44 fish species were detected across the four methods used. The 0.45 {micro}m filter recovered the highest richness (39 species), then the metaprobe method (35), followed by the 1.2 {micro}m (34) and 5 {micro}m (33) filters. Filter performance between salinity gradients revealed that the 0.45 {micro}m and the 1.2 {micro}m methods recovered the highest species richness across all sampled zones. The 0.45 {micro}m also had the most consistent detection probabilities using representative species from each zone. While the 0.45 {micro}m method appeared to be the optimal method, each of the methods can be considered as a viable and comparable option for biomonitoring in dynamic ecosystems such as estuaries and rivers. In particular, the passive metaprobe (used in a freshwater system for the first time here) performed well in comparison to the manual filtering methods despite a short deployment time. This study provides critical insights for optimising fish biodiversity assessments using eDNA metabarcoding in estuarine ecosystems, providing a valuable framework for future monitoring efforts in similar systems worldwide.

molecular biology↗

Assessing group size and the demographic composition of unhabituated northern muriqui (Brachyteles hypoxanthus) using non-invasive biomonitoring

Obtaining accurate population measures of endangered species is critical for effective conservation and management actions and to evaluate their success overtime. However, determining the population size and demographic composition of most canopy forest-dwelling species has proven to be challenging. Here, we apply two non-invasive biomonitoring methods, arboreal camera trap and genetic tagging of faecal samples, to estimate the population size of a critically endangered primate, the northern muriqui (Brachyteles hypoxanthus), in the Caparao National Park, Brazil. When comparing population sizes between camera trapping and genetic tagging, the genetic tagging survey estimated fewer individuals for one of the muriqui groups studied but showed slightly higher population size estimates for the other group. In terms of the cost-efficiency of both methods, arboreal camera trapping had high initial costs but was more cost-effective in the long-term. Genetic tagging on the other hand did not require expensive equipment for data collection but had higher associated expenses for laboratory consumables and data processing. We recommend the use of both methods for northern muriqui monitoring and provide suggestions for improving the implementation of these non-invasive methods for future routine monitoring. Our findings also highlight the potential of arboreal camera trapping and genetic tagging to other arboreal mammals in tropical forests.

ecology↗

Mapping differences in mammalian distributions and diversity using environmental DNA from rivers

AimFinding more efficient ways to monitor, and estimate the diversity of, mammalian communities is a major step towards their management and conservation. Environmental DNA (eDNA) from river water has recently been shown to be a viable method for biomonitoring mammalian communities. Yet, most of the studies to date have focused on the potential for eDNA to detect individual species, with little focus on describing patterns of community diversity and structure. In this study, we focus on the sampling effort required to reliably map the diversity and distribution of semi-aquatic and terrestrial mammals and allow inferences of community structure surrounding rivers. LocationSoutheastern England MethodsWe used eDNA metabarcoding on water samples collected along two rivers and a beaver enclosure over two days, targeting terrestrial and semi-aquatic mammals. Mammalian community diversity and composition was assessed based on species richness and {beta}-diversity. Differences between river communities were calculated and partitioned into nestedness and turnover, and the sampling effort required to rapidly detect semi-aquatic and terrestrial species was evaluated based on species accumulation curves and occupancy modelling. ResultseDNA metabarcoding efficiently detected 25 wild mammal species from five orders in two days of sampling, representing the vast majority (82%) of the species expected in the area. The required sampling effort varied between orders, with common species (generally rodents, deer and lagomorph species) more readily detected, with carnivores detected less frequently. Measures of species richness differed between rivers (both overall and within each mammalian order) and patterns of {beta}-diversity revealed the importance of species replacement in sites within each river, against a pattern of species loss between the two rivers. Main conclusionseDNA metabarcoding demonstrated its capability to rapidly detect mammal species, allowing inferences of community composition that will better inform future sampling strategies for this Class. Importantly, this study highlights the potential use of eDNA data for investigating mammalian community dynamics over different spatial scales.

ecology↗

Primer biases in the molecular assessment of diet in multiple insectivorous mammals

Our understanding of trophic interactions of small insectivorous mammals has been drastically improved with the advent of DNA metabarcoding. The technique has continued to be optimised over the years, with primer choice repeatedly being a vital factor for dietary inferences. However, the majority of dietary studies examining the effect of primer choice often rely on in silico analyses or comparing single-niche species. Here we apply DNA metabarcoding to empirically compare the prey detection capabilities of two widely used primer sets when assessing the diets of a flying (lesser horseshoe bat; Rhinolophus hipposideros) and two ground dwelling insectivores (greater white-toothed shrew; Crocidura russula and pygmy shrew; Sorex minutus). Although R. hipposideros primarily rely on two prey orders (Lepidoptera and Diptera), the unique taxa detected by each primer shows that a combination of primers may be the best approach to fully describe bat trophic ecology. However, random forest classifier analysis suggest that one highly degenerate primer set detected the majority of both shrews diet despite higher levels of host amplification. The wide range of prey consumed by ground-dwelling insectivores can therefore be accurately documented from using a single broad-range primer set, which can decrease cost and labour. The results presented here show that dietary inferences will differ depending on the primer or primer combination used for insectivores occupying different niches (i.e. hunting in the air or ground) and demonstrate the importance of performing empirical pilot studies for novel study systems.

ecology↗

eDNA in a bottleneck: obstacles to fish metabarcoding studies in megadiverse freshwater systems

The current capacity of environmental DNA (eDNA) to provide accurate insights into the biodiversity of megadiverse regions (e.g., the Neotropics) requires further evaluation to ensure its reliability for long-term monitoring. In this study, we first evaluated the taxonomic resolution capabilities of a short fragment from the 12S rRNA gene widely used in fish eDNA metabarcoding studies, and then compared eDNA metabarcoding data from water samples with traditional sampling using nets. For the taxonomic discriminatory power analysis, we used a specifically curated reference dataset consisting of 373 sequences from 264 neotropical fish species (including 47 newly generated sequences) to perform a genetic distance-based analysis of the amplicons targeted by the MiFish primer set. We obtained an optimum delimitation threshold value of 0.5% due to lowest cumulative errors. The barcoding gap analysis revealed only a 50.38% success rate in species recovery (133/264), highlighting a poor taxonomic resolution from the targeted amplicon. To evaluate the empirical performance of this amplicon for biomonitoring, we assessed fish biodiversity using eDNA metabarcoding from water samples collected from the Amazon (Adolpho Ducke Forest Reserve and two additional locations outside the Reserve). From a total of 84 identified Molecular Operational Taxonomic Units (MOTUs), only four could be assigned to species level using a fixed threshold. Measures of -diversity analyses within the Reserve showed similar patterns in each site between the number of MOTUs (eDNA dataset) and species (netting data) found. However, {beta}-diversity revealed contrasting patterns between the methods. We therefore suggest that a new approach is needed, underpinned by sound taxonomic knowledge, and a more thorough evaluation of better molecular identification procedures such as multi-marker metabarcoding approaches and tailor-made (i.e., order-specific) taxonomic delimitation thresholds.

ecology↗

Space-time dynamics in monitoring neotropical fish communities using eDNA metabarcoding

The biodiverse Neotropical ecoregion remains insufficiently assessed, poorly managed, and threatened by unregulated human activities. Novel, rapid and cost-effective DNA-based approaches are valuable to improve understanding of the biological communities and for biomonitoring in remote areas. Here, we evaluate the potential of environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding for assessing the structure and distribution of fish communities by analysing sediments and water from 11 locations along the Jequitinhonha River catchment (Brazil). Each site was sampled twice, before and after a major rain event in a five-week period and fish diversity was estimated using high-through-put sequencing of 12S rRNA amplicons. In total, 252 Molecular Operational Taxonomic Units (MOTUs) and 34 fish species were recovered, including endemic, introduced, and previously unrecorded species for this basin. Spatio-temporal variation of fish assemblages was detected, richness during the first campaign was nearly twice as high as in the second sampling round; though peaks of diversity were primarily associated with only four locations. No correlation between {beta}-diversity and longitudinal distance or presence of dams was detected, but low species richness observed at sites located near dams indicates that these anthropogenic barriers might have an impact on local fish diversity. Unexpectedly high -diversity levels recorded at the river mouth suggest that these sections should be further evaluated as putative "eDNA reservoirs" for rapid monitoring. By uncovering spatio-temporal changes, unrecorded biodiversity components, and putative anthropogenic impacts on fish assemblages, we further strengthen the potential of eDNA metabarcoding as a biomonitoring tool, especially in regions often neglected or difficult to access.

ecology↗

Fishing for mammals: landscape-level monitoring of terrestrial and semi-aquatic communities using eDNA from lotic ecosystems

O_LIEnvironmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding has revolutionised biomonitoring in both marine and freshwater ecosystems. However, for semi-aquatic and terrestrial animals, the application of this technique remains relatively untested.\nC_LIO_LIWe first assess the efficiency of eDNA metabarcoding in detecting semi-aquatic and terrestrial mammals in natural lotic ecosystems in the UK by comparing sequence data recovered from water and sediment samples to the mammalian communities expected from historical data. Secondly, we evaluate the detection efficiency of eDNA samples compared to multiple conventional non-invasive survey methods (latrine surveys and camera trapping) using occupancy modelling.\nC_LIO_LIeDNA metabarcoding detected a large proportion of the expected mammalian community within each area. Common species in the areas were detected at the majority of sites. Several key species of conservation concern in the UK were detected by eDNA in areas where authenticated records do not currently exist, but potential false positives were also identified for several non-native species.\nC_LIO_LIWater-based eDNA samples provided comparable results to conventional survey methods in per unit of survey effort for three species (water vole, field vole, and red deer) using occupancy models. The comparison between survey effort to reach a detection probability of [≥]0.95 revealed that 3-6 water replicates would be equivalent to 3-5 latrine surveys and 5-30 weeks of single camera deployment, depending on the species.\nC_LIO_LISynthesis and Applications. eDNA metabarcoding represents an extremely promising tool for monitoring mammals, allowing for the detection of multiple species simultaneously, and provides comparable results to widely-used conventional survey methods. eDNA from freshwater systems delivers a terrestrial dividend by detecting both semi-aquatic and terrestrial mammalian communities, and provides a basis for future monitoring at a landscape level over larger spatial and temporal scales (i.e. long-term monitoring at national levels).\nC_LI

ecology↗

Influence of Preservation Methods, Sample Medium and Sampling Time on eDNA Recovery in a Neotropical River

Environmental DNA (eDNA) has rapidly emerged as a promising biodiversity monitoring technique, proving to be a sensitive and cost-effective method for species detection. Despite the increasing popularity of eDNA, several questions regarding its limitations remain to be addressed. We investigated the effect of sampling medium and time, and preservation methods, on fish detection performance based on eDNA metabarcoding of neotropical freshwater samples. Water and sediment samples were collected from 11 sites along the Jequitinhonha River, Southeastern Brazil; sediment samples were stored in ethanol, while the same amounts of water per sample (3L) were stored in a cool box with ice, as well as by adding the cationic surfactant Benzalkonium chloride (BAC). Sediment and water samples yielded a similar amount of fish MOTUs (237 vs 239 in the first sampling event, and 153 vs 142 in the second sampling event). Water stored in ice provided better results than those preserved in BAC (239 and 142 vs 194 and 71 MOTUs). While documenting the effectiveness of eDNA surveys as practical tools for fish biodiversity monitoring in poorly accessible areas, we showed that keeping water samples cooled results in greater eDNA recovery and taxon detection than by adding cationic surfactants as sample preservatives. Furthermore, by comparing two sets of samples collected from the same locations at a three-week interval, we highlight the importance of conducting multiple sampling events when attempting to recover a realistic picture of fish assemblages in lotic systems.

molecular biology↗