Biology subjects

Salemme, R.

Publications and source records attributed to Salemme, R..

5 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2022

Alpha oscillations reflect similar mapping mechanisms for localizing touch on hands and tools

Numerous studies have suggested that tools become incorporated into a representation of our body. A prominent hypothesis suggests that our brain re-uses body-based computations when we use tools. However, little is known about how this is implemented at the neural level. Here we used the ability to localize touch on both tools and body parts as a case study to fill this gap. Neural oscillations in the alpha (8-13 Hz) and beta (15-25 Hz) frequency bands are involved in mapping touch on the body in distinct reference frames. Alpha activity reflects the mapping of touch in external coordinates, whereas beta activity reflects the mapping of touch in skin-centered coordinates. Here, we aimed at pinpointing the role of these oscillations during tool-extended sensing. We recorded participants oscillatory activity while tactile stimuli were applied to either hands or the tips of hand-held rods. The posture of the hands/tool-tips was uncrossed or crossed at participants body midline in order for us to disentangle brain responses related to different coordinate systems. We found that alpha-band activity was modulated similarly across postures when localizing touch on hands and on tools, reflecting the position of touch in external space. Source reconstruction also indicated a similar network of cortical regions involved for tools and hands. Our findings strongly suggest that the brain uses similar oscillatory mechanisms for mapping touch on the body and tools, supporting the idea of neural processes being repurposed for tool-use. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTTool use is one of the defining traits of humankind. Tools allow us to explore our environment and expand our sensorimotor abilities. A prominent hypothesis suggests that our brain re-uses body-based neural processing to swiftly adapt to the use of tools. However, little is known about how this is implemented at the neural level. In the present study we used the ability to map touch on both tools and body parts as a case study to fill this gap. We found that the brain uses similar oscillatory mechanisms for mapping touch on a hand-held tool and on the body. These results provide novel and compelling support to the idea that neural processes devoted to body-related information are re-purposed for tool-use.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2021

Alpha oscillations are involved in localizing touch on hand-held tools

The sense of touch is not restricted to the body but can also extend to external objects. When we use a hand-held tool to contact an object, we feel the touch on the tool and not in the hand holding the tool. The ability to perceive touch on a tool actually extends along its entire surface, allowing the user to accurately localize where it is touched similarly as they would on their body. While the neural mechanisms underlying the ability to localize touch on the body have been largely investigated, those allowing to localize touch on a tool are still unknown. We aimed to fill this gap by recording the EEG signal of participants while they localized tactile stimuli on a hand-held rod. We focused on oscillatory activity in the alpha (7-14 Hz) and beta (15-30 Hz) range, as they have been previously linked to distinct spatial codes used to localize touch on the body. Beta activity reflects the mapping of touch in skin-based coordinates, whereas alpha activity reflects the mapping of touch in external space. We found that alpha activity was solely modulated by the location of tactile stimuli applied on a hand-held rod. Source reconstruction suggested that this alpha power modulation was localized in a network of fronto-parietal regions previously implicated in higher-order tactile and spatial processing. These findings are the first to implicate alpha oscillations in tool-extended sensing and suggest an important role for processing touch in external space when localizing touch on a tool.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2020

Patterns of multisensory facilitation distinguish peripersonal from reaching space

Peripersonal space (PPS) is a multisensory representation of the space near body parts facilitating interactions with the close environment. Studies on non-human and human primates converge in showing that PPS is a body-part-centred representation that guides actions. Because of these characteristics, growing confusion conflates peripersonal and arm-reaching space (ARS), that is the space ones arm can reach. Despite neuroanatomical evidence favors their distinction, no study has contrasted directly their respective extent and behavioral features. Here, in five experiments (N=140) we found that PPS differs from ARS, as evidenced both by participants spatial and temporal performance and its modeling. We mapped PPS and ARS using both their respective gold standard tasks and a novel multisensory facilitation paradigm. Results show that 1) PPS is smaller than ARS; 2) multivariate analyses of spatial patterns of multisensory facilitation predict participants hand locations within ARS; 3) the multisensory facilitation map shifts isomorphically following hand positions, revealing hand-centred coding of PPS, therefore pointing to a functional similarity to the receptive fields of monkeys multisensory neurons. A control experiment further corroborated these results and additionally ruled out the orienting of attention as driving mechanism for the increased multisensory facilitation near the hand. In sharp contrast, ARS mapping results in a larger spatial extent, with undistinguishable patterns across hand positions, cross-validating the conclusion that PPS and ARS are distinct spatial representations. These findings urge for a refinement of theoretical models of PPS, which is relevant to constructs as diverse as self-representation, social interpersonal distance, and motor control.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2020

Reaching to sounds in virtual reality: A multisensory-motor approach to re-learn sound localisation

When localising sounds in space the brain relies on internal models that specify the correspondence between the auditory input reaching the ears and initial head-position with coordinates in external space. These models can be updated throughout life, setting the basis for re-learning spatial hearing abilities in adulthood. This is particularly important for individuals who experience long-term auditory alterations (e.g., hearing loss, hearing aids, cochlear implants) as well as individuals who have to adapt to novel auditory cues when listening in virtual auditory environments. Until now, several methodological constraints have limited our understanding of the mechanisms involved in spatial hearing re-learning. In particular, the potential role of active listening and head-movements have remained largely overlooked. Here, we overcome these limitations by using a novel methodology, based on virtual reality and real-time kinematic tracking, to study the role of active multisensory-motor interactions with sounds in the updating of sound-space correspondences. Participants were immersed in a virtual reality scenario showing 17 speakers at ear-level. From each visible speaker a free-field real sound could be generated. Two separate groups of participants localised the sound source either by reaching or naming the perceived sound source, under binaural or monaural listening. Participants were free to move their head during the task and received audio-visual feedback on their performance. Results showed that both groups compensated rapidly for the short-term auditory alteration caused by monaural listening, improving sound localisation performance across trials. Crucially, compared to naming, reaching the sounds induced faster and larger sound localisation improvements. Furthermore, more accurate sound localisation was accompanied by progressively wider head-movements. These two measures were significantly correlated selectively for the Reaching group. In conclusion, reaching to sounds in an immersive visual VR context proved most effective for updating altered spatial hearing. Head movements played an important role in this fast updating, pointing to the importance of active listening when implementing training protocols for improving spatial hearing. HIGHLIGHTS- We studied spatial hearing re-learning using virtual reality and kinematic tracking - Audio-visual feedback combined with active listening improved monaural sound localisation - Reaching to sounds improved performance more than naming sounds - Monaural listening triggered compensatory head-movement behaviour - Head-movement behaviour correlated with re-learning only when reaching to sounds

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2020

SPHERE: A novel approach to 3D and active sound localization

In everyday life, localizing a sound source in free-field entails more than the sole extraction of monaural and binaural auditory cues to define its location in the three-dimensions (azimuth, elevation and distance). In spatial hearing, we also take into account all the available visual information (e.g., cues to sound position, cues to the structure of the environment), and we resolve perceptual ambiguities through active listening behavior, exploring the auditory environment with head or/and body movements. Here we introduce a novel approach to sound localization in 3D named SPHERE (European patent n{degrees} WO2017203028A1), which exploits a commercially available Virtual Reality Head-mounted display system with real-time kinematic tracking to combine all of these elements (controlled positioning of a real sound source and recording of participants responses in 3D, controlled visual stimulations and active listening behavior). We prove that SPHERE allows accurate sampling of the 3D spatial hearing abilities of normal hearing adults, and it allowed detecting and quantifying the contribution of active listening. Specifically, comparing static vs. free head-motion during sound emission we found an improvement of sound localization accuracy and precisions. By combining visual virtual reality, real-time kinematic tracking and real-sound delivery we have achieved a novel approach to the study of spatial hearing, with the potentials to capture real-life behaviors in laboratory conditions. Furthermore, our new approach also paves the way for clinical and industrial applications that will leverage the full potentials of active listening and multisensory stimulation intrinsic to the SPHERE approach for the purpose rehabilitation and product assessment.

neuroscience↗