bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Sagouis, A.

Publications and source records attributed to Sagouis, A..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Land use influences on freshwater biodiversity

Land-use change is a major driver of biodiversity loss, but most generalizations about its effects come from terrestrial ecosystems. In freshwater systems, impacts are often indirect, driven by changes in the surrounding landscape that alter flow, chemistry, and connectivity. Using species-level abundance data from 163 studies across 6 biological groups, we examined how urban, agricultural, and forestry land uses affect freshwater biodiversity at local and regional scales. All three land-use types reduced species richness and altered relative abundance structure compared to natural vegetation, with urban systems showing the strongest and most consistent declines. Only urbanization was associated with biotic homogenization, particularly among abundant species. Biodiversity responses to land-use change also varied with latitude and taxonomic group: tropical assemblages tended to differentiate across sites, while homogenization was more common at higher latitudes. Macroinvertebrates and fish showed the strongest overall declines. These findings challenge assumptions of generality across ecosystems and highlight the need to explicitly incorporate freshwater biodiversity into global change research and policy.

ecology↗

Widespread reductions in body size are paired with stable assemblage biomass.

Biotic responses to global change include directional shifts in organismal traits. Body size, an integrative trait that determines demographic rates and ecosystem functions, is often thought to be shrinking in the Anthropocene. Here, we assess the prevalence of body size change in six taxon groups across 5,032 assemblage time-series spanning 1960-2020. Using the Price equation to partition this change into within-species body size versus compositional changes, we detect prevailing decreases in body size through time. Change in assemblage composition contributes more to body size changes than within-species trends, but both components show substantial variation in magnitude and direction. The biomass of assemblages remains remarkably stable as decreases in body size trade-off with increases in abundance. One-Sentence SummaryVariable within-species and compositional trends combine into shrinking body size, abundance increases and stable biomass.

ecology↗

Synthesis reveals biotic homogenisation and differentiation are both common

It is commonly thought that the biodiversity crisis includes widespread decreases in the uniqueness of different sites in a landscape (biotic homogenization). Using a typology relating homogenization and differentiation to local and regional diversity changes, we synthesize patterns across 283 metacommunities surveyed for 10-91 years, and 54 species checklists (13-500+ years). On average, there is a 0.2% increase in species shared among communities/year (i.e., weak homogenization), but across data sets, differentiation frequently occurs, with no statistically significant change being most common. Local (not regional) diversity frequently underlies composition change, and homogenization is strongly associated with checklist data that have longer durations and large spatial scales. Conservation and management can benefit from the multiscale perspective used here as it disentangles the implications of both the differentiation and homogenization currently unfolding. One-Sentence SummaryBiotic homogenization is most prevalent at large temporal and spatial scales.

ecology↗

Local biodiversity change reflects interactions among changing abundance, evenness and richness

Biodiversity metrics often integrate data on the presence and abundance of multiple species. Yet understanding covariation of changes to the numbers of individuals, the evenness of species relative abundances, and the total number of species remains limited. Using individual-based rarefaction curves, we introduce a conceptual framework to understand how expected positive relationships among changes in abundance, evenness and richness arise, and how they can break down. We then examined interdependencies between changes in abundance, evenness and richness in more than 1100 assemblages sampled either through time or across space. As predicted, richness changes were greatest when abundance and evenness changed in the same direction, and countervailing changes in abundance and evenness acted to constrain the magnitude of changes in species richness. Site-to-site changes in abundance, evenness, and richness were often decoupled, and pairwise relationships between changes in these components across assemblages were weak. In contrast, changes in species richness and relative abundance were strongly correlated for assemblages varying through time. Temporal changes in local biodiversity showed greater inertia and stronger relationships between the component changes when compared to site-to-site variation. Local variation in assemblage diversity was rarely due to a passive sample from a more or less static species abundance distribution. Instead, changing species relative abundances often dominated local variation in diversity. Moreover, how changing relative abundances combined with changes to total abundance frequently determined the magnitude of richness changes. Embracing the interdependencies between changing abundance, evenness and richness can provide new information for better understanding biodiversity change in the Anthropocene.

ecology↗