Biology subjects

Safikhani, Z.

Publications and source records attributed to Safikhani, Z..

7 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2020

ORCESTRA: a platform for orchestrating and sharing high-throughput pharmacogenomic analyses

Reproducibility is essential to open science, as there is limited relevance for findings that can not be reproduced by independent research groups, regardless of its validity. It is therefore crucial for scientists to describe their experiments in sufficient detail so they can be reproduced, scrutinized, challenged, and built upon. However, the intrinsic complexity and continuous growth of biomedical data makes it increasingly difficult to process, analyze, and share with the community in a FAIR (findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable) manner. To overcome these issues, we created a cloud-based platform called ORCESTRA (orcestra.ca), which provides a flexible framework for the reproducible processing of multimodal biomedical data. It enables processing of clinical, genomic and perturbation profiles of cancer samples through automated processing pipelines that are user-customizable. ORCESTRA creates integrated and fully documented data objects with persistent identifiers (DOI) and manages multiple dataset versions, which can be shared for future studies.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2019

Creating reproducible pharmacogenomic analysis pipelines

The field of Pharmacogenomics presents great challenges for researchers that are willing to make their studies reproducible and shareable. This is attributed to the generation of large volumes of high-throughput multimodal data, and the lack of standardized workflows that are robust, scalable, and flexible to perform large-scale analyses. To address this issue, we developed pharmacogenomic workflows in the Common Workflow Language to process two breast cancer datasets in a reproducible and transparent manner. Our pipelines combine both pharmacological and molecular profiles into a portable data object that can be used for future analyses in cancer research. Our data objects and workflows are shared on Harvard Dataverse and Code Ocean where they have been assigned a unique Digital Object Identifier, providing a level of data provenance and a persistent location to access and share our data with the community.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2019

Karyotypic divergence confounds cellular phenotypes in large pharmacogenomic studies

BackgroundSomatic copy-number alterations that affect large genomic regions are a major source of genomic diversity in cancer and can impact cellular phenotypes. Clonal heterogeneity within cancer cell lines can affect phenotypic presentation, including drug response.\n\nMethodsWe aggregated and analyzed SNP and copy number profiles from six pharmacogenomic datasets encompassing 1,691 cell lines screened for 13 molecules. To look for sources of genotype and karyotype discordances, we compared SNP genotypes and segmental copy-ratios across 5 kb genomic bins. To assess the impact of genomic discordances on pharmacogenomic studies, we assessed gene expression and drug sensitivity data for compared discordant and concordant lines.\n\nResultsWe found 6/1,378 (0.4%) cell lines profiled in two studies to be discordant in both genotypic and karyotypic identity, 51 (3.7%) discordant in genotype, 97 (7.0%) discordant in karyotype, and 125 (9.1%) potential misidentifications. We highlight cell lines REH, NCI-H23 and PSN1 as having drug response discordances that may hinge on divergent copy-number q\n\nConclusionsOur study highlights the low level of misidentification as evidence of effective cell line authentication standards in recent pharmacogenomic studies. However, the proclivity of cell lines to acquire somatic copy-number variants can alter the cellular phenotype, resulting in a biological and predictable effects on drug sensitivity. These findings highlight the need for verification of cell line copy number profiles to inform interpretation of drug sensitivity data in biomedical studies.

cancer biology↗

bioRxiv2017

PharmacoDB: an integrative database for mining in vitro anticancer drug screening studies

Recent pharmacogenomic studies profiled large panels of cancer cell lines against hundreds of approved drugs and experimental chemical compounds. The overarching goal of these screens is to measure sensitivity of cell lines to chemical perturbation, correlate these measures to genomic features, and thereby develop novel predictors of drug response. However, leveraging this valuable data is challenging due to the lack of standards for annotating cell lines and chemical compounds, and quantifying drug response. Moreover, it has been recently shown that the complexity and complementarity of the experimental protocols used in the field result in high levels of technical and biological variation in the in vitro pharmacological profiles. There is therefore a need for new tools to facilitate rigorous comparison and integrative analysis of large-scale drug screening datasets. To address this issue, we have developed PharmacoDB (pharmacodb.pmgenomics.ca), a database integrating the largest pharmacogenomic studies published to date. Here, we describe how the curation of cell line and chemical compound identifiers maximizes the overlap between datasets and how users can leverage such data to compare and extract robust drug phenotypes. PharmacoDB provides a unique resource to mine a compendium of curated pharmacogenomic datasets that are otherwise disparate and difficult to integrate.\n\nKey pointsO_LICuration of cell line and drug identifiers in the largest pharmacogenomic studies published to date\nC_LIO_LIUniform processing of drug sensitivity data to reduce heterogeneity across studies\nC_LIO_LIMultiple drug response summary metrics enabling visual comparison and integrative analysis\nC_LI

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2017

Consensus on Molecular Subtypes of Ovarian Cancer

INTRODUCTIONVarious computational methods for gene expression-based subtyping of high-grade serous (HGS) ovarian cancer have been proposed. This resulted in the identification of molecular subtypes that are based on different datasets and were differentially validated, making it difficult to achieve consensus on which definitions to use in follow-up studies. We assess three major subtype classifiers for their robustness and association to outcome by a meta-analysis of publicly available expression data, and provide a classifier that represents their consensus.\n\nMETHODSWe use a compendium of 15 microarray datasets consisting of 1,774 HGS ovarian tumors to assess 1) concordance between published subtyping algorithms, 2) robustness of those algorithms to re-clustering across datasets, and 3) association of subtypes with overall survival. A consensus classifier is trained on concordantly classified samples, and validated by leave-one-dataset-out validation.\n\nRESULTSEach subtyping classifier identified subsets significantly differing in overall survival, but were not robust to re-fitting in independent datasets and grouped only approximately one third of patients concordantly into four subtypes. We propose a consensus classifier to identify the minority of unambiguously classifiable tumors across multiple gene expression platforms, using a 100-gene signature. The resulting consensus subtypes correlate with patient age, survival, tumor purity, and lymphocyte infiltration.\n\nCONCLUSIONSOur analysis demonstrates that most HGS ovarian cancers are not able to be subtyped. A minority of tumors can be classified and our proposed consensus classifier consolidates and improves on the robustness of three previously proposed subtype classifiers. It provides reliable stratification of patients with HGS ovarian tumors of clearly defined subtype, and will assist in studying the role of polyclonality in the majority of tumors that are not robustly classifiable.

cancer biology↗

bioRxiv2017

Gene isoforms as expression-based biomarkers predictive of drug response in vitro

BackgroundOne of the main challenges in precision medicine is the identification of molecular features associated to drug response to provide clinicians with tools to select the best therapy for each individual cancer patient. The recent adoption of next-generation sequencing technologies enables accurate profiling of not only gene expression but also alternatively-spliced transcripts in large-scale pharmacogenomic studies. Given that altered mRNA splicing has been shown to be prominent in cancers, linking this feature to drug response will open new avenues of research in biomarker discovery.\n\nMethodsTo address the lack of reproducibility of drug sensitivity measurements across studies, we developed a meta-analytical framework combining the pharmacological data generated within the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE) and the Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC). Predictive models are fitted with CCLE RNA-seq data as predictor variables, controlled for tissue type, and combined GDSC and CCLE drug sensitivity values as dependent variables.\n\nResultsWe first validated the biomarkers identified from GDSC and CCLE using an existing pharmacogenomic dataset of 70 breast cancer cell lines. We further selected four drugs with the most promising biomarkers to test whether their predictive value is robust to change in pharmacological assay. We successfully validated 10 isoform-based biomarkers predictive of drug response in breast cancer, including TGFA-001 for the MEK tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) AZD6244, DUOX-001 for the EGFR inhibitor erlotinib, and CPEB4-001 transcript expression associated with lack of sensitivity to paclitaxel.\n\nConclusionThe results of our meta-analysis of pharmacogenomic data suggest that isoforms represent a rich resource for biomarkers predictive of response to chemo- and targeted therapies. Our study also showed that the validation rate for this type of biomarkers is low (<50%) for most drugs, supporting the requirements for independent datasets to identify reproducible predictors of response to anticancer drugs.

bioinformatics↗

bioRxiv2016

Tissue specificity of in vitro drug sensitivity

Research in oncology traditionally focuses on specific tissue type from which the cancer develops. However, advances in high-throughput molecular profiling technologies have enabled the comprehensive characterization of molecular aberrations in multiple cancer types. It was hoped that these large-scale datasets would provide the foundation for a paradigm shift in oncology which would see tumors being classified by their molecular profiles rather than tissue types, but tumors with similar genomic aberrations may respond differently to targeted therapies depending on their tissue of origin. There is therefore a need to reassess the potential association between pharmacological response and tissue of origin for therapeutic drugs, and to test how these associations translate from preclinical to clinical settings.\n\nIn this paper, we investigate the tissue specificity of drug sensitivities in large-scale pharmacological studies and compare these associations to those found in clinical trial descriptions. Our meta-analysis of the four largest in vitro drug screening datasets indicates that tissue of origin is strongly associated with drug response. We identify novel tissue-drug associations, which may present exciting new avenues for drug repurposing. One caveat is that the vast majority of the significant associations found in preclinical settings do not concur with clinical observations. Accordingly, our results call for more testing to find the root cause of the discrepancies between preclinical and clinical observations.

bioinformatics↗