bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Sabirov, M.

Publications and source records attributed to Sabirov, M..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Taxonomically mixed blue mussel Mytilus populations are spatially heterogeneous and temporally unstable in the subarctic Barents Sea

Subarctic populations of blue mussels represented by "cryptic" species Mytilus edulis (ME) and M. trossulus (MT) have been studied less intensively than Arctic and boreal populations. Ecological features of ME and MT in sympatry are poorly known everywhere. The knowledge about mussels at the northeasternmost boundary of the Atlantic littoral communities on Murman coast of the Barents Sea is based on data obtained 50-100 years ago. Our study provides the first insight into the long-term dynamics of the Barents Sea mussels, the habitat segregation of ME and MT, and the interannual dynamics of their mixed settlements. The Tyuva Inlet (Kola Bay), which is 3 km long, was used as the study site. Mussels were found everywhere in the littoral and the sublittoral down to a depth of 4 m. Their characteristic habitats were sandbanks, littoral rocks, sublittoral kelp forests and "the habitat of the mussel bed" in the freshened top of the inlet. The main spatial gradients explaining the variability of demographics of the settlements (abundance, age structure, size) were associated with the depth and the distance from the inlet top. ME and MT were partially segregated by depth: ME dominated in the sublittoral and MT, in the littoral. In addition, ME dominated both in the littoral and in the sublittoral parts of the mussel bed. The ratio of species in the mixed settlements varied over time: between 2004 and 2010 the proportions of MT decreased everywhere, by 22 % on average. Historical data indicate that the abundance of the Murman mussels declined sharply between the 1960s and the 1970s, which coincided with the cooling of the Arctic. It seems that the populations have not completely recovered in the abnormally warm recent decades. The habitat distribution of mussels apparently changed with time, too: unlike today, in the 20th century mussels were rarely observed in kelps. We suggest that the spatial and temporal dynamics of subarctic mussels can be partly explained by the competition between ME and MT combined with their differing sensitivity to environmental factors.

ecology↗

Mechanism and functional role of the interaction between CP190 and the architectural protein Pita in Drosophila melanogaster

The architectural protein Pita is critical for Drosophila embryogenesis and predominantly binds to gene promoters and insulators. In particular, Pita is involved in the organization of boundaries between regulatory domains that controlled the expression of three hox genes in the Bithorax complex (BX-C). The best-characterized partner for Pita is the BTB/POZ-domain containing protein CP190. Using in vitro pull-down analysis, we precisely mapped two unstructured regions of Pita that interact with the BTB domain of CP190. Then we constructed transgenic lines expressing the Pita protein of the wild-type and mutant variants lacking CP190-interacting regions. The expression of the mutant protein completely complemented the null pita mutation. ChIP-seq experiments with wild-type and mutant embryos showed that the deletion of the CP190-interacting regions did not significantly affect the binding of the mutant Pita protein to most chromatin sites. However, the mutant Pita protein does not support the ability of multimerized Pita sites to prevent cross-talk between the iab-6 and iab-7 regulatory domains that activate the expression of Abdominal-B (Abd-B), one of the genes in the BX-C. The recruitment of a chimeric protein consisting of the DNA-binding domain of GAL4 and CP190-interacting region of the Pita to the GAL4 binding sites on the polytene chromosomes of larvae induces the formation of a new interband, which is a consequence of the formation of open chromatin in this region. These results suggested that the interaction with CP190 is required for the primary Pita activities, but other architectural proteins may also recruit CP190 in flies expressing only the mutant Pita protein. Author SummaryPita is required for Drosophila development and binds specifically to a long motif in active promoters and insulators. Pita belongs to the Drosophila family of zinc-finger architectural proteins, which also includes Su(Hw) and the conserved among higher eukaryotes CTCF. The architectural proteins maintain the active state of regulatory elements and the long-distance interactions between them. The CP190 protein is recruited to chromatin through interaction with the architectural proteins. Here we mapped two regions in Pita that are required for interaction with the CP190 protein. We have demonstrated that CP190-interacting region of the Pita can maintain nucleosome-free open chromatin and is critical for Pita-mediated enhancer blocking activity. At the same time, interaction with CP190 is not required for the in vivo function of the mutant Pita protein, which binds to the same regions of the genome as the wild-type protein. Unexpectedly, we found that CP190 was still associated with the most of genome regions bound by the mutant Pita protein, which suggested that other architectural proteins were continuing to recruit CP190 to these regions. These results support a model in which the regulatory elements are composed of combinations of binding sites that interact with several architectural proteins with similar functions.

molecular biology↗

The bithorax complex iab-7 Polycomb Response Element has a novel role in the functioning of the Fab-7 chromatin boundary

Expression of the three Bithorax complex homeotic genes is orchestrated by nine parasegment-specific regulatory domains. Autonomy of each domain is conferred by boundary elements (insulators). Here, we have used an in situ replacement strategy to reanalyze the sequences required for the functioning of one of the best-characterized fly boundaries, Fab-7. It was initially identified by a deletion, Fab-71, that transformed parasegment (PS) 11 into a duplicate copy of PS12. Fab-71 deleted four nuclease hypersensitive sites, HS*, HS1, HS2, and HS3, located in between the iab-6 and iab-7 regulatory domains. Transgene and P-element excision experiments mapped the boundary to HS*+HS1+HS2, while HS3 was shown to be the iab-7 Polycomb response element (PRE). Recent replacement experiments showed that HS1 is both necessary and sufficient for boundary activity when HS3 is also presented in the replacement construct. Surprisingly, while HS1+HS3 combination has full boundary activity, we discovered that HS1 alone has only minimal function. Moreover, when combined with HS3, only the distal half of HS1, dHS1, is needed. A [~]1,000 kD multiprotein complex containing the GAF protein, called the LBC, binds to the dHS1 sequence and we show that mutations in dHS1 that disrupt LBC binding in nuclear extracts eliminate boundary activity and GAF binding in vivo. HS3 has binding sites for GAF and Pho proteins that are required for PRE silencing. In contrast, HS3 boundary activity only requires the GAF binding sites. LBC binding with HS3 in nuclear extracts, and GAF association in vivo depend upon the HS3 GAF sites, but not the Pho sites. Consistent with a role for the LBC in HS3 boundary activity, the boundary function of the dHS1+HS3mPho combination is lost when the flies are heterozygous for a mutation in the GAF gene. Taken together, these results reveal a novel function for the iab-7 PREs in chromosome architecture.\n\nAuthor SummaryPolycomb group proteins (PcG) are important epigenetic regulators of developmental genes in all higher eukaryotes. In Drosophila, these proteins are bound to specific regulatory DNA elements called Polycomb group Response Elements (PREs). PcG support proper patterns of homeotic gene expression throughout development. Drosophila PREs are made up of binding sites for a complex array of DNA binding proteins, including GAF and Pho. In the regulatory region of the bithorax complex (BX-C), the boundary/insulator elements organize the autonomous regulatory domains, and their active or repressed states are regulated by PREs. Here, we studied the domain organization of the Fab-7 boundary and the neighboring PRE, which separate the iab-6 and iab-7 domains involved in transcription of the Abd-B gene. It was previously thought that PRE recruits PcG proteins that inhibit activation of the iab-7 enhancers in the inappropriate domains. However, here we found that PRE contributes to boundary activity and in combination with a key 242 bp Fab-7 region (dHS1) can form a completely functional boundary. Late Boundary Complex (LBC) binds not only to dHS1 but also to PRE and is required for the boundary activity of both elements. At the same time, mutations of Pho binding sites strongly diminish recruiting of PcG but do not considerably affect boundary function, suggesting that these activities can be separated in PRE.

genetics↗