Biology subjects

Runnqvist, E.

Publications and source records attributed to Runnqvist, E..

3 recordsLinked to original sources

bioRxiv2024

From movements to words: action monitoring in the medial frontal cortex along a caudal to rostral prediction error gradient

Speech error monitoring recruits the medial frontal cortex (MFC) region in the human brain. Error monitoring-related activity in the MFC has been interpreted both in terms of conflict monitoring and feedback-driven control, but as similar regions of the MFC are implicated in various levels of behavioral control ranging from basic motor movement control to high-level cognitive control functions, a more comprehensive account is needed. Moreover, as speech errors and other actions that involve varying control demands engage a widespread yet partially overlapping set of regions of the MFC, such an account should ideally explain the anatomical distribution of error-related functional activations within the MFC. Here we wanted to assess the hypothesis that the MFC has a similar role in the evaluation of action outcomes for motor and mental actions, operating along a rostral-caudal gradient of higher-lower level control demands involving prediction errors from both sensory and epistemic sources. To this end, we conducted an individual-specific annotation of task-fMRI BOLD activation peaks related to speech errors versus correct productions (i.e. that involve the largest cognitive control demands, Study I and II), tongue movement monitoring (i.e. that involve an intermediate level of cognitive and motor control demands) and tongue movement (i.e. that involve only motor control demands, Study II) in the MFC region. Results revealed overlapping clusters across the three contrasts across the MFC, but importantly both the number of peaks and their relative position along the rostral caudal axis were consistent with a hierarchical rostral caudal processing gradient in the MFC. While tongue movement showed more caudal activation in the MFC, speech errors showed more rostral activation, and tongue movement monitoring patterned in between. Furthermore, the combined results of both studies suggested that activation peaks were located more dorsally for participants that had a paracingulate gyrus, replicating a previously documented effect for movement and further supporting a common functional role of the MFC across very distinct actions.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2024

Congruent brain signatures specific to speech sounds in fronto-temporal cortex during language production and understanding.

In this fMRI study we investigated whether language production and understanding recruit the same phoneme-specific networks. We did so by comparing the brains response to different phoneme categories in minimal pairs: Bilabial-initial words (e.g., monkey) were contrasted to alveolar-initial words (e.g., donkey) in 37 participants performing both language production and comprehension tasks. Region-of-Interest analyses showed that the same sensorimotor networks were activated across the language modalities. In motor regions, word production and comprehension elicited the same phoneme-specific topographical activity patterns, with stronger haemodynamic activations for alveolar-initial words in the tongue cortex and stronger activations for bilabial-initial words in the lip cortex. In the posterior and middle superior temporal cortex, production and comprehension likewise resulted in similar activity patterns, with enhanced activations to alveolar-compared to bilabial-initial words. These results disagree with the classical separation between language production and understanding in neurobiological models of language, and instead advocate for a cortical organization where the same phoneme-specific acoustic-and-articulatory representations carry production and comprehension.

neuroscience↗

bioRxiv2020

The cerebellum is involved in internal and external speech error monitoring

An fMRI study examined how speakers inspect their own speech for errors. In a word production task, we observed enhanced involvement of the right posterior cerebellum for trials that were correct, but on which participants were more likely to make a word-as compared to a non-word error. Furthermore, comparing errors to correctly produced utterances, we observed increased activation of the same cerebellar region, in addition to temporal and medial frontal regions. Within the framework associating the cerebellum to forward modelling of upcoming actions, this indicates that forward models of verbal actions contain information about word representations used for error monitoring even before articulation (internal monitoring). Additional resources relying on speech perception and conflict monitoring are deployed during articulation to detect overt errors (external monitoring). In summary, speech monitoring seems to recruit a network of brain regions serving domain general purposes, even for abstract levels of processing.

neuroscience↗