bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Ruesseler, M.

Publications and source records attributed to Ruesseler, M..

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Decision-making in dynamic, continuously evolving environments: quantifying the flexibility of human choice

During perceptual decision-making tasks, centroparietal EEG potentials report an evidence accumulation-to-bound process that is time locked to trial onset. However, decisions in real-world environments are rarely confined to discrete trials; they instead unfold continuously, with accumulation of time-varying evidence being recency-weighted towards its immediate past. The neural mechanisms supporting recency-weighted continuous decision making remain unclear. Here, we use a novel continuous task design to study how the Centroparietal Positivity (CPP) adapts to different environments that place different constraints on evidence accumulation. We show that adaptations in evidence weighting to these different environments are reflected in changes in the CPP. The CPP becomes more sensitive to fluctuations in sensory evidence when large shifts in evidence are less frequent, and the potential is primarily sensitive to fluctuations in decision-relevant (not decision-irrelevant) sensory input. A complementary triphasic component over occipito-parietal cortex encodes the sum of recently accumulated sensory evidence, and its magnitude covaries with parameters describing how different individuals integrate sensory evidence over time. A computational model based on leaky evidence accumulation suggests these findings can be accounted for by a shift in decision threshold between different environments, which is also reflected in the magnitude of pre-decision EEG activity. Our findings reveal how adaptations in EEG responses reflect flexibility in evidence accumulation to the statistics of dynamic sensory environments.

neuroscience↗

Computational specialization within the cortical eye movement system

Animals actively sample their environment through orienting actions such as saccadic eye movements. Saccadic targets are selected based both on sensory evidence immediately preceding the saccade, and a salience map or prior built up over multiple saccades. In the primate cortex, the selection of each individual saccade depends on competition between target-selective cells that ramp up their firing rate to saccade release. However it is less clear how a cross-saccade prior might be represented, either in neural firing or through an activity-silent mechanism such as modification of synaptic weights on sensory inputs. Here we present evidence from magnetoencephalography for two distinct processes underlying the selection of the current saccade, and the representation of the prior, in human parietal cortex. While the classic ramping decision process for each saccade was reflected in neural firing rates (measured in the event related field), a prior built up over multiple saccades was represented via modulation of the gain on sensory inputs from the preferred target, as evidenced by rapid frequency tagging. A cascade of computations over time (initial representation of the prior, followed by evidence accumulation and then updating) provides a mechanism by which a salience map may be built up across saccades in parietal cortex. It also provides insight into why evidence accumulation signals are present in parietal cortex, when inactivation of the region has been shown not to affect performance on single-trial tasks.

neuroscience↗