bioRxiv Science⌕ Search

Biology subjects

Rueger, T.

Publications and source records attributed to Rueger, T..

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Color polymorphism in the saddleback clownfish, Amphiprion polymnus: species or complex?

Color polymorphism can facilitate local adaptation, maintain intraspecific diversity, or reflect early stages of speciation. Clownfishes (Amphiprion spp.) typically display a simple black, orange, and white pattern, but the saddleback clownfish (Amphiprion polymnus) shows striking variation in melanism and the number of vertical bars, which are thought to play a role in species recognition. In 2024, a revision on iNaturalist split A. polymnus into multiple species based solely on color pattern and geographic range. This raises the question of whether these morphs represent true species or intraspecific polymorphism, which we tested using genomic and image-based data. We sampled 97 individuals from seven populations across the species range and quantified color patterns from standardized photographs. Phenotypic and genomic analyses reveal a complex pattern of divergence. Image analysis identified three distinct phenotypic clusters, with A. polymnus, A. annamensis, and A. laticlavius each showing consistent differences in saddle shape and vertical bar extent. ADMIXTURE resolved three distinct genetic groups corresponding to the morphs. Pairwise FST (0.54-0.71) and dxy indicate extremely high differentiation between A. polymnus and A. annamensis, consistent with species-level divergence, whereas A. laticlavius shows much lower differentiation from A. polymnus (FST 0.09-0.18) and higher differentiation from A. annamensis (FST 0.64-0.66). Overall, phenotypic and genomic data show structured variation, but the status of A. laticlavius remains ambiguous. Our study reveals clear and structured divergence across the full range, yet the taxonomic interpretation of this variation remains inherently challenging. The key question remains: do these patterns reflect a single polymorphic species or a complex of closely related species?

ecology↗

Spend today or build for tomorrow? Kinship dynamics and the evolution of alternative helping strategies in cooperative breeders.

Cooperatively breeding animal groups are characterised by the presence of helpers, which assist breeders in raising offspring through a variety of behaviours, such as provisioning young or defence against predators. While these systems have been studied to investigate how costly forms of help can evolve, there is little theory explaining the considerable variation in helping strategies observed across such societies. Here, we use mathematical models to investigate the evolution of alternative helping strategies. Helpers in our models can allocate effort to immediate, short-term benefits or durable, long-term benefits. We find that allocation depends on the kinship dynamics within the group. Specifically, where helpers are more related to future breeders than current breeders, often because they themselves become the future breeder, our model typically predicts greater allocation to durable help. Conversely, immediate help is favoured when helpers are less related to future breeders than to current breeders. We use our model to explore how demographic features impact kinship dynamics within the group, identify which factors select for immediate versus durable help, and which amplify conflict between breeders and helpers over helping strategies. The model is a first step towards explaining variation in types of help observed among cooperatively breeding societies.

evolutionary biology↗

Reading Outside the Lines: A Systematic Approach for Detecting Bias in Scientific Communication

Consciousness of the social impact of science and the potential biases of its authors is critical to understanding, interpreting, and using scientific findings responsibly. This is especially true for sciences concerned with human health and behavior, where societal and unconscious biases may reinforce existing inequities and discriminatory practices. Considering backgrounds and biases, we may notice bias influencing scientists methodological choices and conclusions, even when a work is otherwise scientifically sound. To this end, we created the pedagogical tool Finding inEquity in LIterature and eXperimentation (FELIX). FELIX is a tool that systematizes the detection of bias and subjectivity in scientific communications by using a three-phase progression of (i) Annotation, (ii) Analysis and (iii) Synthesis, where students form a unified argument about the text with a focus on its relationship to social or ethical context. Results from a mixed methods approach indicated the efficacy of our approach in supporting student learning related to reading comprehension, critical thinking skills, and in understanding the social and ethical implications of the research they were reading. We put forward FELIX as a universal method for training students in the reading of scientific communications and as a tool for addressing systemic inequities in science and science education.

scientific communication and education↗

Cooperative and aggressive behaviours vary between ranks in anemonefish social hierarchies

Many animal groups consist of individuals organised in dominance hierarchies, based on age, size or fighting ability. Lower ranked individuals often do not reproduce themselves but perform cooperative behaviours to help the reproductive output of dominant individuals or the group as a whole. Theoretical models suggest that individuals of higher rank should show increased amounts of aggressive behaviours, such as aggressions towards other group members, but should decrease the amount of cooperative behaviours, such as brood care or territory maintenance. Most empirical tests of these models focus on insect or mammalian systems where kin selection plays a large role, rather than animals that live in groups of unrelated individuals. Here we use two anemonefish species to test hypotheses of variation in cooperation and aggression with respect to social rank and species, for social systems where group members are unrelated. We assessed the behaviours of each rank in 20 groups of Amphiprion percula and 12 groups of A. perideraion in Kimbe Bay, Papua New Guinea. We also performed a removal experiment to test if cooperative and aggressive behaviours are likely adaptive, i.e., if they change as an individual ascends in rank. Our results show differences between the two species, with A. percula showing more cooperative behaviours and A. perideraion showing more aggressive behaviours, despite them being closely related and sharing a very similar ecology. With respect to both cooperation and aggression we found consistent differences between ranks in both species, with higher ranks performing more aggressive as well as more cooperative behaviours. When we experimentally provided lower ranked individuals (rank 4) an opportunity to ascend in the hierarchy, they showed more aggression and more cooperation in line with our observations for rank 3 individuals. Thus, we show that rank specific behavioural patterns are likely adaptive in anemonefishes and that some model predictions do not hold in systems where kin selection benefits are absent. Rather, future fitness benefits through territory inheritance and group augmentation likely motivate cooperative and aggressive behaviours by subordinates in groups of unrelated vertebrates.

animal behavior and cognition↗